Because you are comparing two different versions... If you do that to anything the newer one will always (most of the time) look better. The air was cutting edge when it came out. My wife wanted it for portability, e-mail and word processing with the occasional video being watched. If you bought that laptop thinking that it was going to be a gaming rig (during the revision A run) you were fooling yourself and I even told her that. It is also the reason that I bought a regular Macbook. Hers runs great and she loves it. Video does not skip as some have reported and even with SL it is a nice little laptop. Sorry, ours is great.
A gaming rig? WTF? I don't think you understand the TRUE EXPECTATIONS of someone paying $1799 to $3099 for a computer that Apple declared a MAC. It did NOT perform to the normal EXPECTATIONS of a Mac. It was a poor performer, an overheated, problematic, too confined, piece of garbage that couldn't do "normal" computing tasks ANY Mac user would define as "Mac-like."
I think you're a little off base on your analysis of me and what ANYONE would expect from the MBA when it was first introduced. It was essentially sold as MacBook like performance from a thin and lightweight computer that is built for the "business Pro." If Apple would have said from the beginning that this MBA might be lightweight and thin but would not live up to the NORMAL expectations of Mac users as it would not do X, Y, or Z, then customers wouldn't have expected it to work like their previous Macs. However, it was implied that the MBA was a REAL Mac that would perform within a normal range any Mac user could expect.
It's NOT NORMAL for a Mac to experience core shutdowns, massive overheating, lockups, and etc for a two minute non-HD video clip. That's only touching the surface of the real problems. It demanded too much power with those components, and within the confined space of the MBA it could NOT perform like ANY Mac user would expect. THAT'S A PROBLEM!
Some people don't want to admit it, or are too big of fanboys bash Apple or Steve Jobs, but Apple deserves every bit of lashing original MBA buyers can dish out. Bottom line was the original MBA was a novelty NOT capable of what a "normal" Mac user would expect when spending so much money. For anyone who paid $999 to $1299 it's a completely DIFFERENT story. The buyers who paid $999 to $1299 were NOT the intended market... that's obvious. And Apple dumped the original MBAs as they couldn't perform up to the expectations of a normal Mac user let alone someone in the niche area of an ultraportable for business "pros." The problem is that Apple did not take care of its customers. It had spent money developing the MBA, and knew it was too problematic for the price and market it intended to sell the MBAs to; so Apple just sold as many as it could until the niche buyers caught on to the problems with the original MBA, then Apple dropped the price and dumped the rest.
The original MBA has cost Apple a fortune in lost goodwill with its deceptive marketing and failure to disclose the problems of the original MBA. I for one will never forget how many people I knew that had problems and did nothing but complain and then dump their original MBAs. It simply couldn't meet the market buyers expectations. It wasn't a Mac and didn't deserve the Apple logo. Apple could have learned its lesson and replaced EVERY original MBA with a rev B that actually worked, but Apple instead has damaged its reputation for a certain group of niche buyers. Apple realizes now how bad the original MBA was, because it had to drastically lower the price to even sell the much more capable v 2,1 MBAs.
It's just too bad that Apple didn't treat the original MBA as a sunk cost and wait for the components to catch up with the form factor Apple had designed for the MBA.
Going back to your initial statement, this is a long way from expecting the MBA to be a "gaming rig." It's a far different story, and I believe that a few people could accept the problems with the MBA if their use was so very limited as to not see the problems. The biggest problem with that is that the original MBA performed no different from a netbook for those who just needed to check their email... I am not calling the original MBA a netbook. It had a beautiful display and worthy keyboard for a writer typing on it. It's just that the C2D and other components were of no advantage because they caused serious overheating.
I would LOVE LOVE LOVE to see Apple in a huge lawsuit over the original MBA, and I am a shareholder too. I just believe Apple should realize when it has done wrong and FIX the situation for all who were originally duped by Apple and Jobs over the original MBA. It would have been an easy fix. Replace all original MBAs with a rev B; sell all the originals traded in for $999 as a "MacBook Lite," and advertised it as a great Mac for typing a Pages document or email.
Too bad that Apple has given the MBA a bad reputation as an incapable Mac, because the v 2,1 MBAs have been really nice Macs that perform like Macs should... for the most part.