You are all completely insane.
12" 1.18 x 10.9 x 8.6
13.3"1.08 x 12.78 x 8.92
How can you honestly tell me that the 13" is too big compared to the 12"?
The MB's footprint is ~22% bigger.
You are all completely insane.
12" 1.18 x 10.9 x 8.6
13.3"1.08 x 12.78 x 8.92
How can you honestly tell me that the 13" is too big compared to the 12"?
Forget about 12" Apple laptops. Give me the 11.1" Sony TZ version. I want something that is so small and light that I may just carry it with me everywhere when I am not using my 17" MBP.
Give me a laptop with 7.5 hours of battery life....
Give me a laptop with NO optical drive and a 64GB SSD for speedy performance
Give me a machine with an underpowered processor that just gets me by at typing papers and emails and surfing the web and doing some small multimedia work so I don't have to worry about burning my legs off when Safari is open, or so that my battery can make it to that 7 hours of life.
Give me built-in Sprint Broadband so that I can surf the web anywhere at any time.
All I need is 2 USB ports and a mini DVI connection and I am fine, everything else can be done wirelessly or through a hub. I am just sitting back and waiting for MWSF 08. If the ultraportable MacBook doesn't come I won't be surprised or upset. That just means that Sony will have to get my $2500 for an 11.1" laptop with kick @$$ battery life and that I will have to get used to Vista or find a copy of XP to put back on my machine.
I'd rather stick with Mac OS X for my personal computing needs, but if I suddenly desire an 11.1" machine and Apple doesn't offer one.... well, there you have it.
Some of you guys are forgetting something:
and the OP was comparing screen sizes. Not laptop sizes
It's not, IMO. But you missed the point. The 13" MacBook is the equivalent of the iBook, i.e. somewhat lacking in the hardware department. We're after a 12" (or even 13") MacBook PRO, whilst currently the smallest is a massive 15".
I hope that Apple comes out with a 32" Mac Book Extreme. Go big, or go home.![]()
You are all completely insane.
12" 1.18 x 10.9 x 8.6
13.3"1.08 x 12.78 x 8.92
How can you honestly tell me that the 13" is too big compared to the 12"?
It's about the weight for me for an ultraportable, as much as the slightly handier size. But the 12" weighed as much as the Macbook - after I found that out I kind of failed to see the point at all.
Fortunately not being wedded to OS X, I have options right now and need not wait for some defect-ridden machine to come out from Apple in the near future - although of course I will be compelled to pick one up and bitch about it as well.
how about the start of a 14"
![]()
Mostly because it's almost two inches wider. You should know that, you looked up the measurements.
Further, the issue is moreso that some people want a smaller "pro" machine rather than anything else. If the MB was aluminum, had a matte option, and a discrete graphics card, it would be less of an issue. Other people want a "true ultraportable" in the sense of it being less than an inch thick, around 2 lbs, and smaller than a 12" screen. Apple can't please both with the same machine if they come out with one, but they won't please either with the macbook. Then there's the nuts that want multi-touch and a 16-core processor together in a floating orb with enough flash memory to hold their ever-important iTunes library... and a built-in can opener.
-Ado
Forget about 12" Apple laptops. Give me the 11.1" Sony TZ version. I want something that is so small and light that I may just carry it with me everywhere when I am not using my 17" MBP.
Give me a laptop with 7.5 hours of battery life....
Give me a laptop with NO optical drive and a 64GB SSD for speedy performance
Give me a machine with an underpowered processor that just gets me by at typing papers and emails and surfing the web and doing some small multimedia work so I don't have to worry about burning my legs off when Safari is open, or so that my battery can make it to that 7 hours of life.
Give me built-in Sprint Broadband so that I can surf the web anywhere at any time.
All I need is 2 USB ports and a mini DVI connection and I am fine, everything else can be done wirelessly or through a hub. I am just sitting back and waiting for MWSF 08. If the ultra-portable MacBook doesn't come I won't be surprised or upset. That just means that Sony will have to get my $2500 for an 11.1" laptop with kick @$$ battery life and that I will have to get used to Vista or find a copy of XP to put back on my machine.
I'd rather stick with Mac OS X for my personal computing needs, but if I suddenly desire an 11.1" machine and Apple doesn't offer one.... well, there you have it.
Oh... that sounds nice. A product from Apple that not only filled one of their gapping holes in their lineup, but one that worked as it was supposed to and run OS X. Sign me up.
... I had really hoped to walk away with a black or white 15" laptop...