Maybe....good point though. I wonder if they have benchmarks between 32 and 64bit systems? I wonder if there are any performance gains?Intense Multitasking?
Maybe....good point though. I wonder if they have benchmarks between 32 and 64bit systems? I wonder if there are any performance gains?Intense Multitasking?
But are there apps that can address and use the extra ram? If the apps are not optimized to see and use 64 bit then it is used just to fill a spec sheet for now. Until the OS and all the apps that support it are optimized to use 64bit. It is kinda useless except to have on a spec sheet. It might be the way things will go in the future......but it is not utilized now......
my note 2 definitely has burn in, but I bought it used that way and I think the previous owner used it as a display of some sort. I've read threads of other people commenting on their note 2 having burn in and it might be bevcause the screen is non-pentile?
I don't want to make this about Apple and Samsung.....Even if it wouldn't matter for the end user right now, there have to be devices with 64 bit for developers to start making apps for it, it just doesn't work the other way around. But yes for the buyer it doesn't matter, unless... Isn't Android L designed to use 64 bit too? With a good implementation of the 64bit compiler, newly compiled apps could benefit from it, from day one.
Anyhow, 64 bit is important for Samsung marketing wise. They market their products in a way like : "Hey Apple is great, but we are just as great (same features) and a step beyond (even more features)" ("The next big thing is already here" comes to mind). The iPhone being 64 bit is a problem for them, because they are lacking behind in this case. (Even though the technical advantage for now is small).
To make this clear: I'm not saying they NEED to step up to 64 bit, I say the WANT to, because of this.
I don't want to make this about Apple and Samsung.....
My comments were strictly about using 64bit versus 32. While 64bit might be the way things will go down the road. I am not sure there are enough apps out there right now that can utilize 64 architecture. There has been enough time now for developers to optimize apps for 64bit but I am not sure that is done yet. I do agree that Samsung wants to keep pace with what Apple does.....they are the leader in the mobile phone space.
I wonder if benchmarks show a performance gain for 64bit?
Nice find! It will even get better once developer get their apps optimized for 64bit architecture!Me neither, I wasn't even saying Samsung is doing something bad or so, just wanted to say that Samsung might not care that much about it being already necessary, but that it's important for their marketing.
Found some ARM v8 Benchmark released by ARM itself:
Image
Same process means the CPU is built nearly the same, apart from being 64 bit. So there is a significant boost. On top (not in this diagram, but in the (german) article in that I've found it) the new processor generation is going to be less power consuming.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_alpha-review-1114p3.php
64bit Exynos 5430 in the galaxy alpha seems amazing.. And note 4 uses the even better 5433
The Apha might turn out to be pretty good performer......Nice link.
Looks like amazing gpu performance combined with the 720p screen
Did not realize the alpha had new latest gen processor
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_alpha-review-1114p3.php
64bit Exynos 5430 in the galaxy alpha seems amazing.. And note 4 uses the even better 5433
Nice link.
Looks like amazing gpu performance combined with the 720p screen
Did not realize the alpha had new latest gen processor
seeing the alpha does make me wonder if the metal look will now be the future of the devices and see if it starts with the flagships like the note. Or if the metal look is just to have a different option.
As long as it has a removeable back i don't mind which the alpha I think does.
I think it has more to do with the fact it is OLED.
Samsung's Galaxy Note range is responsible for creating an entire smartphone niche, not bad for a company often accused of failing to be innovative. The phablet (large screen smartphones) trend was started by the Korean company and ever since the Galaxy Note has dominated the market. With good reason too, as each new Note has been the best phablet available by the proverbial country mile. The Galaxy Note 4 is due to land at the IFA trade show on September 3rd and once again it will undoubtedly be a staggering piece of hardware, but this time it may not have things its own way.
Read more at http://www.mobileburn.com/23313/rumors/rumour-roundup-samsung-galaxy-note-4#fXKho1Vhtx5gZyUl.99
Yes that's it! I knew I had read something about the screen technology. So it's not amoled but oled?
http://www.sammobile.com/2014/08/21...es-16mp-side-touch-wide-selfie-and-much-more/
Exclusive: Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Camera Features 16MP, Side Touch, Wide Selfie, and much more.
This a perfect example of why excessive display resolution can be counter productive. Can't believe I'm gonna say this but for once, maybe Samsung didn't shoot themselves in the foot and are onto something with the Alpha.
http://www.sammobile.com/2014/08/21...es-16mp-side-touch-wide-selfie-and-much-more/
Exclusive: Samsung Galaxy Note 4 Camera Features 16MP, Side Touch, Wide Selfie, and much more.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_alpha-review-1114p3.php
64bit Exynos 5430 in the galaxy alpha seems amazing.. And note 4 uses the even better 5433