I don't think they need to change the design. It is a winner for them. I hope they concentrate on the software side this time out. I have also heard rumors of a very improved camera as well.
I heard they were going to release these models. I would get Galaxy S7 Plus (5.7 inch screen) on release day if true.
Galaxy S7
Galaxy S7 edge
Galaxy S7 Plus (5.7 inch screen)
Galaxy S7 edge plus (5.7 inch screen)
I don't think they need to change the design. It is a winner for them. I hope they concentrate on the software side this time out. I have also heard rumors of a very improved camera as well.
I heard they were going to release these models. I would get Galaxy S7 Plus (5.7 inch screen) on release day if true.
Galaxy S7
Galaxy S7 edge
Galaxy S7 Plus (5.7 inch screen)
Galaxy S7 edge plus (5.7 inch screen)
They didn't use the 810 because of overheating. That's why there was only one CPU for this year's models. Next gen will go back to two, unless the 820 exhibits problems of overheating.Agreed...as the old saying goes, 'if it ain't broke...' Whatever criticisms have been levied against the S6 models, physical design certainly isn't one of them. And why add the extra cost of a redesign if it's not necessary? My only suggestion would be to ditch the two separate designs and just go with the edge version.
I also don't see them using two different CPUs. They didn't this year and unless I missed it, don't recall reading of any Exynos CPU related issues, either in performance or production. And considering the lackluster performance of the 810, I see no viable reason why Samsung would turn away from their own in-house CPU. If they didn't need two different CPUs this year, why would they need it on the S7?
I suspect the battery will be roughly the same size
In terms of hardware, it doesn't seem like they will add an SD card slot or the ability to remove the battery (Galaxy users can comment on whether or not those are wise choices)
Here are my thoughts from an S6 Edge+ owner. I'm mostly content with my phone, but I wouldn't mind to have some other things included. Most of the things which people complain about with this phone aren't really a problem with me. I like TouchWiz and the features that come with it, although I wouldn't mind less random freezing. Battery life isn't a problem, but I would like the charging to be a bit quicker. With Quick Charge technology advancing, that shouldn't be a problem.
What other things would you like included? The quick charging is one of the fastest out there. It is faster on the S6 but that's because it has a smaller battery. I'm very happy with mine the only problem I experienced was a defective touch screen (sometimes wouldn't register touches) that led to a warranty replacement. The screen is bomb though and the speed is very good, as well as the camera.
That's a bold prediction, but not necessarily an impossible one to come true. The Note 5 was the first Note device that, besides the extra gig of RAM, had nothing different from its "S" counterpart (I'm unsure how much customers noticed those lack of changes).I'm always skeptical when I hear 'we are focusing on software' every time we have the build up to a new Samsung device. So far there has been an improvement but were still quite a far away from where it could be optimisation wise.
IF and i think in this instance all caps isn't strong enough emphasis, so I will have to bold and big text it;
IF they do go back to the bare bones and optimise to the ninth degree - whilst retaining core features that make touchwiz what it is launcher wise, Samsung could finally ship/sell the numbers of flagship devices that has eluded them since the Galaxy S3.
We all know competition in the android space is getting tougher EVERY year and I have no doubt at all 2016 will be just as tough.
Sticking to same hardware design as the S6 is a wise choice from a manufacturing and research cost recapitalisation point of view, but that does mean that software will be in prime focus by the reviewers and critics this coming year. If it turns out to be empty promises, as sadly software wise has often been the case, Samsung are unlikely to recapture their magic highs despite the S7 undoubtably being a very solid handset.
I'll make one prediction for 2016 and samsung phones. If they release a S7 Plus & S7 Edge Plus alongside the regular size S7 / S7 Edge then I predict the Note 5 will be the final Note device and there will not be a Note 6. They have already proven they are not adverse to cancelling the device.
That's a bold prediction, but not necessarily an impossible one to come true. The Note 5 was the first Note device that, besides the extra gig of RAM, had nothing different from its "S" counterpart (I'm unsure how much customers noticed those lack of changes).
On top of that, phones that are released in the last quarter have to compete with the iPhone, so perhaps that will be the case.
The Note 5 was the first Note device that, besides the extra gig of RAM, had nothing different from its "S" counterpart (I'm unsure how much customers noticed those lack of changes).
S-Pen ????
That's a very good point, though part of me thinks that they won't cancel it because they like to brag in their events about how they pioneered the phablet and the S-Pen.Add they already set the precedent of deciding no release/cancelling it, in one of Samsung's major territories. If sales have not been stellar in those remaining, it wouldn't take a huge leap to just cancel it altogether, replaced with the larger S7 Plus
The S-Pen will always be the the factor that sets the Note Series apart, but I was referring to the Note 5 having the same SoC and cameras as the S6.S-Pen ????
Touchwiz is really not that bad folks. I'm equally excited by their focus on software, but it's not like they have to turn the ship completely around. They've been doing exactly what has been asked of them by reviewers and journalists. It's not like touchwiz has that much work to do.
If I had to guess, it's an iterative version of the S6. The camera ought to be spectacular.
No, what's horrible is how the Samsung implementation of Touchwiz causes severe delays in future releases of Android on Samsung devices.
exactly...It is not that bad. Those that complain about ram management...well it only affects a very small portion of the total users. I like what Samsung has to offer. I haven't found another Android OEM that can match it so far and I have had a LOT of phones.Touchwiz is really not that bad folks. I'm equally excited by their focus on software, but it's not like they have to turn the ship completely around. They've been doing exactly what has been asked of them by reviewers and journalists. It's not like touchwiz has that much work to do.
Touchwiz isn't bad. I don't mind using it on my Tab S2 or Edge+, but I have also disabled a lot of Samsung apps that eat RAM for no apparent reason? If Samsung, left their core apps that are required for things like the S-Pen, Samsung Pay, and Samsung+ and then made the b.s. apps like Flipboard, Facebook, Milk, and S-Voice/Translate/etc optional, it would be a much better experience.exactly...It is not that bad. Those that complain about ram management...well it only affects a very small portion of the total users. I like what Samsung has to offer. I haven't found another Android OEM that can match it so far and I have had a LOT of phones.