Looks like other OEM's are in support of this: (from the conference call)
http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/15/live-blog-the-googlemotorola-acquisition-conference-call/
Bullpucky. Read the press releases, they sound like one guy wrote them all.
Looks like other OEM's are in support of this: (from the conference call)
http://techcrunch.com/2011/08/15/live-blog-the-googlemotorola-acquisition-conference-call/
Who says that Google is going to kill of Motorola branded handsets.
Common sense dictates that if you're spending 12 billion dollars for a phone manufacturer odds are fairly high the buyer will continue to make phones
Bullpucky. Read the press releases, they sound like one guy wrote them all.
They are not happy that google is encroaching in on their turf.
True, but we're not talking about 100 bucks but 12 billion dollars. Even for google that's a significant amount of money and it will cost them $$ to shutter the manufacturing plants as well if they only intended to spend 12 billion dollars on IPNot necessarily. Have you ever played Monopoly where an opponent held Park Place and you land on an unowned Boardwalk? What do you do -- one option is to buy it, mortgage it, take your $200, and let it lie fallow the rest of the game since it's rarely landed on just so your opponent can't start building homes/hotels. Another is to buy it leave it active, get $50 every once in a while.
Just saying there are options, and one of those is to keep the patents and shutter the phone biz. I don't think there is a single common sense answer as you suggest. Could logically go either way, though keeping the biz ongoing is the harder of the two. Either way they keep the patents out of Apple's inventory.
Not necessarily. Have you ever played Monopoly where an opponent held Park Place and you land on an unowned Boardwalk? What do you do -- one option is to buy it, mortgage it, take your $200, and let it lie fallow the rest of the game since it's rarely landed on just so your opponent can't start building homes/hotels. Another is to buy it leave it active, get $50 every once in a while.
Just saying there are options, and one of those is to keep the patents and shutter the phone biz. I don't think there is a single common sense answer as you suggest. Could logically go either way, though keeping the biz ongoing is the harder of the two. Either way they keep the patents out of Apple's inventory.
definitely, plus in public they want to show off that they're one big happy family. They are not happy that google is encroaching in on their turf.
This acquisition makes Apple's purchase in the Nortel patents seem to be a pretty good investment. By spending $2.6 billion, they got their main competitor to spend $12 billion on a company that has been losing money for years, is outside their core competence, and will undermine (to some extent) their relationship with other Android licensees.
Um, source?Might want to get an update on that. That lawsuit is mostly done for Oracle. Their complaint has been gutted and very little remains. Google mostly won their bid in that field.
My problem with this deal is that Google has zero experience in hardware manufacturing. Let's face it, even Android's front end s/w isn't all that inviting, even as they copied iOS's look and feel plus a few more hard buttons. And MOTO phones for the most part have been a disaster. It's the reason why MOTO spun the division off years ago. So I'm unsure how this deal creates any synergy since it's not exactly a great handset maker meets great s/w maker story. It seems more like mixing bleach w/ ammonia.
Um, source?
True, but we're not talking about 100 bucks but 12 billion dollars. Even for google that's a significant amount of money and it will cost them $$ to shutter the manufacturing plants as well if they only intended to spend 12 billion dollars on IP
It's a move that isn't without risk--but its a smart one...
In the near future, quick OS updates on Motorola products will be a selling point and will put pressure on other manufacturers to also issue quick updates.
In the near future, quick OS updates on Motorola products will be a selling point and will put pressure on other manufacturers to also issue quick updates.
Wouldn't agree. Apple spent 2.6B on generic patents. Google spent 12B on mobile handset and tablet patents some dating years. Remember Moto have been in this game for a long time. I suspect Google's patent arsenal now dwarfs Apples especially in Apples Sweetspot (smarphone and tablet).
I'd say this gives Google and its partners cause for some easy sleep.
Thanks!http://www.pcworld.com/businesscent...ed_to_lower_damages_claim_against_google.html
http://www.itworld.com/software/177021/oracles-patent-claims-versus-google-take-potential-hit
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2011/110429-oracle-google.html
Need more ? I think you should follow the case if you really plan on using it to post "Google hate".
Things really aren't going well for Oracle.
That is actually Motorola Solutions.Another aspect:
Motorola Mobility also is a top manufacturer of DVR, settop box, cable modem and other broadband equipment.
Thus Google has acquired many handset related patents, a handset manufacturer, and a major interactive TV and cable equipment producer.
That is actually Motorola Solutions.
Yes, perhaps they could make Android based settop boxes as a "hobby".Well that would be an interest turn if Google decides to incorporate the modem and set top box divisions.
Hardly a desperation move. A smart one indeed, Motorola have a hell of a lot of patents that Google now have the pleasure of using. I'm sure Apple would have grabbed the chance if they have had it.Desperation move my GOOG. MSFT acquisition of Skype is brilliant by comparison.