Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

smithrh

macrumors 68030
Feb 28, 2009
2,743
1,790
*sigh*

Those ad jokes are getting old fast, it's not even original humour and Google would never implement ads like that just like they haven't put ads all over Android.

It's foolish to confuse capability with intentions. They certainly have the capability, and right now as I write this they're in trouble for polluting search results with paid placement. Intentions can go from good to neutral to bad in the wink of an eye.

I find it quite telling that Google is now the butt of many jokes now. They've lost their position of trust for many people.
 

0dev

macrumors 68040
Dec 22, 2009
3,947
24
127.0.0.1
It's foolish to confuse capability with intentions. They certainly have the capability, and right now as I write this they're in trouble for polluting search results with paid placement. Intentions can go from good to neutral to bad in the wink of an eye.

I find it quite telling that Google is now the butt of many jokes now. They've lost their position of trust for many people.

Everything big and well known is the butt of jokes. I certainly trust Google a lot more than Facebook.
 

smithrh

macrumors 68030
Feb 28, 2009
2,743
1,790
Everything big and well known is the butt of jokes. I certainly trust Google a lot more than Facebook.

Just because you trust them doesn't make them trustworthy.

I noted that you didn't address my point about confusing capabilities with intentions.

Oh well, suit yourself. But don't try to tell me that the world's biggest data miner will always be OK with not doing anything with that data stash. Logic tells us the exact opposite.
 

ideal.dreams

macrumors 68020
Jul 19, 2010
2,385
1,158
I just heard about this today and I think it's phenomenal. I wonder how they would work for people with prescription glasses? And to everyone saying that they're dangerous, think about it - there is no glass, it looks like everything is seen through a glass block on the right side of the unit. It's not like when something pops up it's going to obstruct your entire view.
 

0dev

macrumors 68040
Dec 22, 2009
3,947
24
127.0.0.1
Just because you trust them doesn't make them trustworthy.

Most people seem to agree with me from what I've seen. In geek circles, at least.

I noted that you didn't address my point about confusing capabilities with intentions.

I don't get what your "point" was meant to be. Google as the capability to build a giant evil space laser they have so much money, but you've got to think about reality.

If Google put ads all over their Glass product no one would buy it when competitors come along. Now there's no doubt they'd log usage patterns and search history and the like - just as they always have done - but personally I'm not too bothered about it. If you are, don't use the product (or be the product, whatever). Or just wait for them to be rooted so you can stop them phoning home. Either way.

Fact is that, in terms of data mining, Google is very careful these days. After all, the whole world's privacy regulators are watching them 24/7, aren't they? They won't connect everything you look at to your real identity any more than they spy on you through the camera on your Android phone (that is to say, not at all). Like I said, they'll use my search terms to aim ads at me, that's it.

Oh well, suit yourself. But don't try to tell me that the world's biggest data miner will always be OK with not doing anything with that data stash. Logic tells us the exact opposite.

See above. I'm sure they'll use some details but it's nothing to worry about.
 

knightlie

macrumors 6502a
Feb 18, 2008
546
0
*sigh*

Those ad jokes are getting old fast, it's not even original humour and Google would never implement ads like that just like they haven't put ads all over Android.

Most of the Android apps I use have ads plastered all over them, there's no reason to suppose these glasses will be any different.


I just wonder how long it will be before someone is killed wandering around blindly using these things. As if being "powered" by Google isn't bad enough, the safety implications are quite obvious.
 

0dev

macrumors 68040
Dec 22, 2009
3,947
24
127.0.0.1
Most of the Android apps I use have ads plastered all over them, there's no reason to suppose these glasses will be any different.


I just wonder how long it will be before someone is killed wandering around blindly using these things. As if being "powered" by Google isn't bad enough, the safety implications are quite obvious.

Funny, because most of the iOS apps I use have ads plastered all over them too.

And if you watch the video you'll see that this doesn't obscure your vision, it's quite non-intrusive.
 

Joe HS

macrumors 6502
Jun 22, 2011
273
3
United Kingdom
Would these glasses run on iOS or OS X?:)

eyeOS. Sorry. That was bad wasn't it.

Cool concept, but they lost me from a practical standpoint when the voice recognition software was able to pick up Monsieur Gayno with no problem.

Maybe the camera picked up the text from the poster in front of him, analysed it and noted that it was something he was likely to mention shortly.
 

Liquorpuki

macrumors 68020
Jun 18, 2009
2,286
8
City of Angels
I just wonder how long it will be before someone is killed wandering around blindly using these things. As if being "powered" by Google isn't bad enough, the safety implications are quite obvious.

The tech is basically mobile data and controls juxtaposed to your field of vision.

The norm is people walking around looking down at their smartphone LCD bumping into crap and falling into fountains. This would actually be safer.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.