Even the SR MBP is actually outdated the day you start using it... It's a computers, the latest computer don't exist... 
no offense but you bought a computer after apple announced they were going to transition their product line to intel chips. what were you expecting?
The average useful life of desktop is 3-4 years. That's about how long it can handle the latest and greatest technology. Then there is a slow path to being obsolete. No 10.5 for another 3-4 months, then no 10.6 likely until 2009. I think you got your money's worth.
Of course, they are suckers![]()
Never buy Rev A! How hard is it to understand?
I feel a bit shunned by Apple. When I bought me CD laptop in June of last year, I thought it would last at least 3.5 years, well into college for me. Now, I am a bit put off at how Apple has marketed and developed its target releases and the Leopard OS.
Less than 7 months after releasing the 17in CD, they released the 17in 64 bit Merom; then 6 mo. after that, the SR. With leopard being marketed as such a huge discrepancy between 32 and 64 bit processing, it seems CD users will be in the dark once 10.6 is released, and also highly disadvantaged in 10.5 use. This goes without mentioning the countless faults and errors associated with the CDs including overheating, terrible LCDs, and processing whine, most of which has been repaired in the successive, 64 bit, models.
My Mac serves as my editing station as well. FCS2 has been optimized for 64 bit use. My Macbook PRO, designed to be used with these kinds of applications, quickly looses value when industry standards can no longer perform adequately on supposed PRO(FESSIONAL) workstations.
Sorry for the small rant but does anyone else feel as cheated as I do?
You should also keep in mind that with technology, what's hot today is obsolete tomorrow.
The CD machines are awesome and will be great with Leopard. Relax.
Being a bit clueless here, but how exactly will 64-bit make Leopard run better? Isn't it mostly about being able to address larger memory space? My understanding of 64 bit vista vs 32 bit is that there's really no difference in performance.
I feel a bit shunned by Apple. When I bought me CD laptop in June of last year, I thought it would last at least 3.5 years, well into college for me. Now, I am a bit put off at how Apple has marketed and developed its target releases and the Leopard OS.
Less than 7 months after releasing the 17in CD, they released the 17in 64 bit Merom; then 6 mo. after that, the SR. With leopard being marketed as such a huge discrepancy between 32 and 64 bit processing, it seems CD users will be in the dark once 10.6 is released, and also highly disadvantaged in 10.5 use. This goes without mentioning the countless faults and errors associated with the CDs including overheating, terrible LCDs, and processing whine, most of which has been repaired in the successive, 64 bit, models.
My Mac serves as my editing station as well. FCS2 has been optimized for 64 bit use. My Macbook PRO, designed to be used with these kinds of applications, quickly looses value when industry standards can no longer perform adequately on supposed PRO(FESSIONAL) workstations.
Sorry for the small rant but does anyone else feel as cheated as I do?
well..you have to look and see if any of the programs you will use even support 64 bit.
Even the SR MBP is actually outdated the day you start using it... It's a computers, the latest computer don't exist...![]()
Grammars are outdate too!