Guys,
I just bought a 27" retina and one thing i noticed is how slow the damn fusion drive is, what is my option? should i return and get an ssd one or i can take it somewhere and get a ssd installed?
Core Care in Roseville, CA is one. Ask a local Apple store & they should know. It's an alternate to having your system shipped to apple for some repairs.do you know authorized apple service center?
You also have another option. My wife has an old imac and to speed it up due to the slow harddrive I simply bought her a 100$ external Samsung SSD T5 drive - connected it to the mac via USB - and cloned her startup drive onto it - so not even a reinstall is required and all this can be done with mac os internal tools. Then you can change the startup drive to your external drive and still use the internal drive for some data storage and you will have the SSD speed on your OS. Since then she never said that her imac feels slow again - so this is a quick and easy cheap alternative.
Agreed. Fusion Drive was a clever engineering solution when it came out, and (barely) tolerable when it offered 128GB SSD matched to high capacity spinning rust, but not only was worsened to 24GB, it was kept to hit a price point long after it should have been axed. Ever decreasing SSD costs have made it look what it is:
A cynical bean counter's solution to reducing the bill of materials at the expense of the (often uninformed) customer experience.
Forget the iPhone battery class actions, I'd like to see Apple stung for a few $billion for treating their iMac customers with such contempt:
"Can't afford our extortionate prices for a bit more SSD capacity? Fine, we'll make you suffer."
This is a good idea for an old iMac but not for a new one within the return time frame....You loose the elegance of the AiO concept and exchange it for a cable and box clutter on the desk....
THIS !For future reference:
"Friends don't let friends buy iMacs with Fusion Drives."
Unfortunately SSD pricing has remained fairly static over the past year or so.Agreed. Fusion Drive was a clever engineering solution when it came out, and (barely) tolerable when it offered 128GB SSD matched to high capacity spinning rust, but not only was worsened to 24GB, it was kept to hit a price point long after it should have been axed. Ever decreasing SSD costs have made it look what it is:
A cynical bean counter's solution to reducing the bill of materials at the expense of the (often uninformed) customer experience.
Forget the iPhone battery class actions, I'd like to see Apple stung for a few $billion for treating their iMac customers with such contempt:
"Can't afford our extortionate prices for a bit more SSD capacity? Fine, we'll make you suffer."
you know, i have to say something about the fusion drive as it relates to my experiences on the PC side. when apple came out with the 1TB fusion drive and 128gb ssd, i remember thinking to myself, woah that's overkill. Every fusion drive on the PC at that time came with like 16gb of ssd on board. when apple cut it down to 24gb, people threw up their arms, but the PC fusion drives all cut down to 8GB instead. Difference? everybody RAVES about fusion drives on the PC side, but because of apple's cut, the mac side was filled with unhappiness and complaints.