Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

svndmvn

Guest
Nov 6, 2007
1,301
0
Italy
I'm not sure if HDR is really necessary in these circumstances, you could do with a smaller aperture and a longer exposure, probably combining this with an ND grad or a polarizer. Of course don't expect good results from cheap filters but they could do the job.
What's the metadata of the pictures you posted? Sec, aperture etc?
 

acearchie

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Jan 15, 2006
3,264
104
Top picture is f13, 28mm, ISO 100 at varying shutter speeds due to it being HDR but ranging from 1/4000th to about 1/250th

Bottom F11 and all other values the same!
 

Ruahrc

macrumors 65816
Jun 9, 2009
1,345
0
I think the biggest things to remember is that "HDR" doesn't make boring pictures good and is only useful in extreme lighting cases.

Another good one to remember is that "a good photographer is not only judged by what he does shoot, but also what he doesn't". The kinds of pictures you take on a cloudy overcast day should be fundamentally different than those taken on a bright sunny day. To try to use the same approach for both lighting conditions will result in suboptimal results.

Each situation has its strengths for example shooting closeups and macro on overcast days is great because the sky is a giant diffuser. Likewise, shots of people don't work well in the bright sun because all the shadows are too harsh. Sweeping panoramas of a dull cloudy sky don't work well, but they work great in the sun, etc.

Your later efforts seem better than the first ones, especially because they have more compelling subject matter. IMO that one with the rocks in the stream is the best one here.
 

gnd

macrumors 6502a
Jun 2, 2008
568
17
At my cat's house
I believe the spots you are referring to are rain on the UV filter. (Well not rain but drizzle) as it has been a constant drizzle since I have started taking these pictures in Scotland.

There are definitely spots on your sensor. Nothing on a filter will show as a spot. Filter is too far away from the sensor to "drop a shadow" on it. Only dirt on the sensor shows as spots and even those show up mostly at smaller apertures.
 

acearchie

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Jan 15, 2006
3,264
104
There are definitely spots on your sensor. Nothing on a filter will show as a spot. Filter is too far away from the sensor to "drop a shadow" on it. Only dirt on the sensor shows as spots and even those show up mostly at smaller apertures.

Thanks, I am actually borrowing a school camera and firstly it is quite old and secondly it has been used by quite a few people who know less about photography than me meaning that they may have not realised the effects of swapping out the lenses in harsh conditions.

However shouldn't the dust spots be uniform within all the pictures?
 

NathanCH

macrumors 65816
Oct 5, 2007
1,080
264
Vancouver, BC
Doesn't matter where these spots are. You need to clean your camera because they've appeared in the same place on all these photos. Never take a photo again until you clean up... it's disgusting.


4356333067_26c5fd94df_b.jpg

4359391544_87077e73cc_o.jpg

4359420957_94d39f2071_o.jpg
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.