Good points
@MisterKeeks, and largely not things I have not asked myself.
Agreed, I was using a coolant that turns out to not have been all that well regarded, but I no longer use that. These days I use one that I found recommended on these very forums:
I have found myself wondering about the viscosity of this particular coolant, wondering if it is too "thick" for the pump and thus exerting an undo load on it.
In this case however, in the end it turned out that the pump "failure" was simply a loose connection. Once corrected, all was well and the cooling result is excellent, especially those coveted 970 RPM fan readings!
I agree that overhauling an LCS is a methodical step-by-step thing. However, it seems that even the slightest deviation from the optimum processing of each one of those steps seems to leave one with a problem whose only solution is to tear it all down again and redo.
As for the use of the pump with a direct 12v connection, the guide explicitly directs that you do not do this for any length of time and goes into the reasons for that (duty cycle of the pump). Used as directed, brief bursts of pump action can move things around in the loop, helping get an optimal fill. BTW, I got the idea to do this (and the pump connector pinout!) from these very forums!
In the end, I stand by my original comments above. Converting to air cooling is faster and easier, and the result is essentially permanent. You don't have to worry about your (passive) air coolers failing (!) ... and if one of the cooling fans fails (which I have never seen happen), the repair is easy and inexpensive. You do not have to tear down the whole solution to fix it. Your air cooled solution will never develop a leak and no minerals, crystals etc. will ever build up inside the solution over time.
Overhauling an LCS is a different matter. It is much more involved, but it has the upside of when it is done, it returns the Quad to the cooling mechanism that Apple intended. This makes it of historical interest, and of interest as well simply because it IS the more challenging of the two approaches. It is good to master both approaches.