You initially said by Apple ‘raised’ the price to $1000 for the iPhone X was not factually accurate, I was not debating semantics, that was the initial price point They chose for this new generation of iPhone to start at. Yes, I knew what you originally meant, however; your wording was not appropriately conveyed. I merely Indicated that for the sake of discussion or any confusion to other readers. .
Which is why I referenced the 6.1 LCD iPhone in my previous post. The reason being, is Apple offers this iPhone, they may not lower the price of the 5.8 iPhone X and retain it where it is, offering the 6.1 iPhone as a cheaper alternative with lesser technology, but include iPhone X ‘Like’ features. I don’t think you understood the context of my previous post.
Not one word of my previous post was ‘defensive’ whatsoever, if anything, I would say your previous post(s) seem rather [defensive if you will] with your own replies to other members in your own thread.
As for you stating “I seriously think some other people on the site work for Apple own Apple stock etc.” Actually, Apple has a policy in place where employees _cannot_ participate in websites like this. Also, I would say that’s a good assumption that there are shareholders/stockholders that are heavily involved in Apple, especially given that this is an Apple related website discussing mainly Apple products, services and the company as a whole.