I don’t really want a bigger watch, but I would buy something more rugged in a heart beat. I have to be so careful at work with mine and I’m sure plenty of people are put off by wearing them to more manual jobs.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How about a larger Apple Watch
- Thread starter Felix Bomar
- Start date
-
- Tags
- apple watch size series 4
- Sort by reaction score
I think the durability with the space black stainless is fairly rugged for what it’s worth. But I think smart watches in general Are considered fragile because of the glass and construction. I would like to see a brushed stainless model that would hide scratches better over the regular 316 L stainless.
Last edited:
I don’t think they’re that rugged. Knocked mine off a chest of draws and it smashed.
I understand they are fragile which is why I would prefer a more rugged one.
As I said, glass can be an issue because of the construction. But with the diamond like carbon coating on the space black, it’s extremely durable in that respect. So what are you proposing to make it more rugged?
I agree. The thickness is stopping me right now from buying one. It's a hassle with most sleeves - I would constantly adjust the sleeve/pull it over the watch.
The glass to not be so open to knocks when performing more manual labour. Think like a G shock
So, like, they could put a rubber case around it:
(which is what a G-Shock is, fundamentally)
+1. I have my G-Shock to wear for truly abusive occasions (which, lately, has only been the sauna...). But it’s also bulky and more likely to hit something than a thinner watch would.
But, at least there’s the option of getting a case for the AW. I can’t say the same about my Seiko or Rado.
I've been told my whole body is a toothpick! Hahaha.. I'm 6'1" and weight 155 so maybe that why and not the watch?
Nice!I've been told my whole body is a toothpick! Hahaha.. I'm 6'1" and weight 155 so maybe that why and not the watch?
What type of road bike do you have?
Absolutely. But first they are going to have to change that awful design. Hamilton Pulsar P1 circa 1971 wants their design back. Make something that looks like a watch & I'm all in.
I actually think the current design of the Apple Watch is fairly contemporary. It’s comfortable, not to obtrusive and looks elegant enough paired with a leather band or stainless steel link band. Apple isn’t changing the design of the Apple Watch drastically in all likliness and a round version doesn’t appear to be a consideration at this point.
Can’t believe we’ve got three BMC riders in this thread.
(you can juuuust see my SLX01 by the wall with my wife’s hat hanging on the saddle)
It wouldn’t be mandatory just an option for people who feel the standard one is a little delicate for their day to day life.
Love my Fenix 5. I try to wear my AW2 once in a while but always end up back with the Fenix
I literately bought it for the color then fell in love with the ride.Can’t believe we’ve got three BMC riders in this thread.
(you can juuuust see my SLX01 by the wall with my wife’s hat hanging on the saddle)
Attachments
So, like, they could put a rubber case around it
“Fundamentally” The Bumper completely destroys the appeal of the Apple Watch and defeats the purpose of color/casing material. I understand the protection aspect as an alternative pending the circumstance, but the Watch is more than enough durable without that hideous G-Shock look.
Furthermore, what could be more problematic, is those cases can be difficult to install and once dirt/debris gets trapped inside, they can damage the aluminum or stainless casing.
Last edited:
non-smart watches exist in way larger models than what the 42mm Apple Watch represents, but I have small wrists so I wouldn't really care for a bigger watch, but I can imagine there's a market for 46mm watches. Question is, is it big enough and I guess Apple decided it isn't.
I would love a 46-47mm Apple Watch, as long as it can give me battery-life consisting of minimum: 12 hours of GPS tracking ON THE WATCH only, without needing a connection to a phone. 4-7 days of battery life, more buttons (required for sports and when wearing gloves).
My AW3 Nike+ mostly spends it's time in my drawer. I wear my Fenix 5X most of the time, and I'm more or less happy with it's size. I have smaller wrists, but I think the AW3 is too small. I mainly want better battery-life and more buttons (1 or two more, and they need to be more tactile).
I go mountain hiking in Norway all the time, and the AW3 doesn't cut it in regards to battery-life. A hike for me isn't a 2-hour hike where there is cell reception. It's an all-day event without cell reception in very harsh mountains. I'm not interested in bringing along a AW charger to charge it while hiking... With the "WorkOutDoors" app the AW could technically do what I want it to do, if only it had significantly better battery life.
My Fenix 5X can do proper GPS tracking for 20 hours non-stop with turn-by-turn route guidance, track back, and full topographical maps down to 24K. And the screen is always on, and is much more readable in sunlight than the AW3. The AW3 is much more readable when it get's dark though
As of today I consider the AW3 to be a nice office and gym watch. But it's sure as heck not an adventure watch.
I’m hoping for a real Apple Watch Sport
My AW3 Nike+ mostly spends it's time in my drawer. I wear my Fenix 5X most of the time, and I'm more or less happy with it's size. I have smaller wrists, but I think the AW3 is too small. I mainly want better battery-life and more buttons (1 or two more, and they need to be more tactile).
I go mountain hiking in Norway all the time, and the AW3 doesn't cut it in regards to battery-life. A hike for me isn't a 2-hour hike where there is cell reception. It's an all-day event without cell reception in very harsh mountains. I'm not interested in bringing along a AW charger to charge it while hiking... With the "WorkOutDoors" app the AW could technically do what I want it to do, if only it had significantly better battery life.
My Fenix 5X can do proper GPS tracking for 20 hours non-stop with turn-by-turn route guidance, track back, and full topographical maps down to 24K. And the screen is always on, and is much more readable in sunlight than the AW3. The AW3 is much more readable when it get's dark though
As of today I consider the AW3 to be a nice office and gym watch. But it's sure as heck not an adventure watch.
I’m hoping for a real Apple Watch Sport
Last edited: