The noise is terrible, but for me it is severely exacerbated by the attempted mitigation. I would much rather have the noise without the smoothing.The image noise is truly appalling.
The noise is terrible, but for me it is severely exacerbated by the attempted mitigation. I would much rather have the noise without the smoothing.The image noise is truly appalling.
But this is the point; it is the same camera hardware. The issue is that that the size of the display is amplifying the relative small size of the sensor. Apple should have used a larger camera module, but keep in mind that if you are on the receiving end of a video call from a Studio Display and you're using a notebook/iPad, the definition will improve dramatically because you're viewing it on a smaller display.This is highly frustrating. As others are pointing out, Apple’s own iMacs have good built-in webcams. Slap the same one in the Studio Display and this would be a complete non-issue. As is, most of us are going to need to plunk external webcams on top of the otherwise beautiful Studio Dusplay.
I do agree there's something to the point you make around viewing yourself stretched up to 5K versus looking at an image on an iPad. That said, I'm pretty sure the cameras in the 24" iMac and Studio Display are different hardware. Do you know this not to be the case?But this is the point; it is the same camera hardware. The issue is that that the size of the display is amplifying the relative small size of the sensor. Apple should have used a larger camera module, but keep in mind that if you are on the receiving end of a video call from a Studio Display and you're using a notebook/iPad, the definition will improve dramatically because you're viewing it on a smaller display.
Therefore I believe a greater test is to actually view the camera output on a device other than the Studio Display, since you're not going to be looking at yourself at a full 27" during a video call.
Therefore I believe a greater test is to actually view the camera output on a device other than the Studio Display, since you're not going to be looking at yourself at a full 27" during a video call.
I'm pretty sure this is not correct. It's a wide-angle camera, whereas the one in the outgoing 5k iMac (which had the same 27" of display size) was not. Wide-angle makes sense for Center Stage (e.g., the whole family crowds in the room to say hello to grandma) but effectively is software cropped when used by a single person sitting in front of the screen (and therefore highly sub-optimal for desktop videoconferencing (e.g., a Zoom call for work)).But this is the point; it is the same camera hardware. The issue is that that the size of the display is amplifying the relative small size of the sensor. Apple should have used a larger camera module, but keep in mind that if you are on the receiving end of a video call from a Studio Display and you're using a notebook/iPad, the definition will improve dramatically because you're viewing it on a smaller display.
Therefore I believe a greater test is to actually view the camera output on a device other than the Studio Display, since you're not going to be looking at yourself at a full 27" during a video call.
Apologies, I was getting mixed up with the iPad's Centre Stage cam.I'm pretty sure this is not correct. It's a wide-angle camera, whereas the one in the outgoing 5k iMac (which had the same 27" of display size) was not. Wide-angle makes sense for Center Stage (e.g., the whole family crowds in the room to say hello to grandma) but effectively is software cropped when used by a single person sitting in front of the screen (and therefore highly sub-optimal for desktop videoconferencing (e.g., a Zoom call for work)).
Ah, that makes sense, and this does seem to have very similar properties to the iPad camera (which works on the iPad because of the different typical focal length involved). Frankly, I think Apple at this point should quietly revise its camera hardware in the Studio Display to something more optimized to normal desktop use.Apologies, I was getting mixed up with the iPad's Centre Stage cam.
Agreed. I get the impression that Centre Stage is more of a consumer orientated feature where you have family/friends and people moving around more spontaneously. Not to suggest that professionals don't behave this way, but if I were to hold a video call with a client or colleague then I'd take narrower-but-higher quality image over a cropped one that tracks me shifting in my seat any day.Ah, that makes sense, and this does seem to have very similar properties to the iPad camera (which works on the iPad because of the different typical focal length involved). Frankly, I think Apple at this point should quietly revise its camera hardware in the Studio Display to something more optimized to normal desktop use.
I don't understand why Apple doesn't get this.Agreed. I get the impression that Centre Stage is more of a consumer orientated feature where you have family/friends and people moving around more spontaneously. Not to suggest that professionals don't behave this way, but if I were to hold a video call with a client or colleague then I'd take narrower-but-higher quality image over a cropped one that tracks me shifting in my seat any day.