Managed to get my Dual cpu 2.0ghz PMG5 InterwebPPC score. It did better than I had expected.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How high of an Speedometer score do you guys get?
- Thread starter Ryan Bremer
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
maybe the speedometer could also be done on debian/fienix or voidppc, since those linux distributions are lightweight it would work better 
Well mine wasn’t on OSX or Linux as OP didn’t state a required OS 🙂maybe the speedometer could also be done on debian/fienix or voidppc, since those linux distributions are lightweight it would work better
Here is this dualcore2ghz PMG5 running Sorbet+DarkWeb Browser - What a difference.View attachment 2252382
This is through InterwebPPC on a dualcore 2ghz PMG5. Now compared to my win10 box, it scored 171.
nice, you got the highest score of them all in this thread!
And the lowest I think LOL. DW was such an improvement in score, I am now curious what my a1047 score might bump up to. Also, I am very curious what is making the difference between Interweb and DarkWeb. I am not that well versed in browser anatomy to understand why one browser would result in an increase of 1.8 over the other.nice, you got the highest score of them all in this thread!
Also, I know there are some folks on here that own the quad variant of my dualcore a1117. I would love to see that score too even if it knocks my crown off. I think a Quad would be the only PPC machine capable of potentially cresting double digit (10+) scores using DarkWeb.
Is there a download link to this Dark Web browser somewhere? I’m dual booting between MorphOS and Sorbet and would like to also try. Thanks
Great, thanks! Will try and find time tonight and upload a benchmark from my machineDark Web can be found on Macintosh Garden at https://macintoshgarden.org/apps/dark-web-browser
No problem. Download it from here => https://www.sendspace.com/file/pjxrmk (same file from macintoshgarden.org, but uploaded to sendspace.com as you aparrently can't access it)Hmm, I can't even access that site from any of my computers. I've tried on Ventura, PopOS! and obviously Sorbet:
I obviously have access to the internet as I'm posting here
View attachment 2255887
I got a nice improvement! Not as fast as the "new tech" DC processors, but this old DP 2.5 still going strong
Im pretty sure I have a hdd with 16.4 Lubuntu on it around here somewhere. If I can find it, Ill stick it in my DP 2ghz a1047 and see what it scores this weekend.
Managed to find that 16.04 Lubuntu remix image and stuck it back in my a1047. Got these results with Arctic Fox.
I would like to install Void 64ppc on this box and give that a whirl.
Last edited:
After seeing some of these scores I had to take a stand and claim the spot of....
the worst score in the thread. Ladies and gentlemen, Beige Restoration Project scored
SUB-ONE
With 480 runs per test, this means that it apparently took about 874 minutes, or about about 14.5 hours, which is very incorrect as the system has only been up for 4.2 hours.
With 480 runs per test, this means that it apparently took about 263 and a half minutes, or about about 4.4 hours, which is still incorrect even after I corrected my math.
---
Sidebar, OP should totally have a leaderboard because that sounds fun.
edited: my math was incorrect and I've corrected it
the worst score in the thread. Ladies and gentlemen, Beige Restoration Project scored
SUB-ONE
With 480 runs per test, this means that it apparently took about 263 and a half minutes, or about about 4.4 hours, which is still incorrect even after I corrected my math.
---
Sidebar, OP should totally have a leaderboard because that sounds fun.
edited: my math was incorrect and I've corrected it
Last edited:
sure thing,
is the fastest of them all
is the fastest of them all
