Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

How Many Years?

  • 1-3 years

    Votes: 3 5.5%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 9 16.4%
  • 5-10 years

    Votes: 33 60.0%
  • 10 + years

    Votes: 10 18.2%

  • Total voters
    55
I do video/motion picture work (editing and colour grading) with my machines, so my hardware needs are generally a fair bit higher than the average Joe's.

When I eventually replaced my Mac Pro 1,1 in 2013 (it was still ticking away perfectly after a solid seven years of service, but it just didn't have the processing power to keep up with modern video footage) I went with a maxed-out late 2012 iMac (because the Trashcan Mac Pro was not fit for purpose).

That's the only iMac I've owned (so not much of a sample size), but with the consumer-grade iMac I experienced exactly the same thing I'd had with the consumer-grade PCs I'd built myself before switching to Apple in 2006 - which was that it gave up the ghost only three-and-a-bit years after purchasing it, it simply couldn't handle the workload of regularly crunching through high-res video work.

I've since moved backwards to heavily outfitted (and now hacked) 2010 Mac Pro 5,1s because Apple's Prores codec was too fundamental to my work to move back to a PC.

And although they were ancient in 2016 when I first made the move, and practically pre-historic when I upgraded to a revised 5,1 configuration back in December (due to financing falling through on the eye-watering $17,000 AUD I was looking at for a basic Mac Pro 7,1 config), the advantage of the old Xeons is that they just don't die. So if you're going to be throwing heavy lifting duties at your machine - that's really where the painfully high-costs of the server-class Xeon systems show their worth.

For less demanding workloads it's obviously not a big deal, and plenty of people get long usable lives out of their consumer-grade machines. But certainly in my experience, that hasn't proved to be the case.


I feel like we've entered an interesting space now, as video codecs and raw formats have somewhat stabilised in the last couple of years. And a machine like a maxed-out (10-core, 5700XT) 2020 iMac can actually handle those files pretty well (with some help from a powerful eGPU or two).

It has me wondering whether (assuming the recording formats hold roughly where they are for the next few years), a high-end consumer-grade machine might (this time) last a fair bit longer than they have in the past, since the workload demanded of them won't be increasing as exponentially.
 
I’m usually in the 3-4 years frame. I got my 2017 iMac (BTOD with the upgraded i7 and the RX 580 and a 1TB SSD) in July 2017 and am replacing that with the 10-core/5700 XT 16 GB/2 TB 2020.

Since this will likely be my last Intel iMac, I’m hoping to keep it longer. But I tend to upgrade my Macs every 3 to four years, both desktop and laptop — so we’ll see.

My late-2009 iMac would probably still be running but I stopped using it in lieu of a 15” retina MBP in late 2013 and sold it in 2015 or so.
 
My main daily driver is a late '15 iMac. But I also have 2x 2008 iMacs on the go daily, my 2002 G4 400mhz Powerbook still works as it should and 1st Gen Mini also works a treat.
 
iMac 9.1 (early 2009) with 1TB SSD instead of the superdrive, 8 GB RAM. Catalina. In my University office.
iMac 17.1 (2015) 4 GHtz/i7 32 GB Ram, AMD Radeon R9 M395X 4 GB Catalina, at home
MBA 4.2 (2011) 4GB RAM, Catalina
all working sufficiently well. Main uses: TeX, Sagemath, zoom
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.