Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

How long should an ipad’s lifespan be ideally?

  • 5-7 years

    Votes: 219 61.3%
  • 8-10 years

    Votes: 102 28.6%
  • 10-15 years

    Votes: 17 4.8%
  • Longer than 15 years

    Votes: 19 5.3%

  • Total voters
    357

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,915
13,259
I’ve bought an M2 iPad Pro, and while I’m still not sure I’ll keep it or I’ll return it in favor of an M2 MacBook Air, I expect this two devices to get more than 5 years, ideally 10 but I guess Apple will keep the usual 7-8 years of support for macs… I really hope they don’t shorten the lifespan of this devices to 5 or 6 years of support.

And, yes, I expect all M1 and M2 powered devices to get the same years of support, regardless of being an iPad or a Mac.

M1 MacBooks were released in 2020, iPad Pros in 2021 and the iPad Air in 2022. I expect support will be dropped around the same time but the length of support varies depending on release date.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus

*~Kim~*

macrumors 65816
May 6, 2013
1,177
470
UK
10 years of being functional. By functional I don’t mean being a great experience, because obviously there will be technological improvements and there’s a price to be paid if you want the latest and greatest. I mean getting done what you need to do: banking, shopping, looking things up, watching TV shows. A degraded battery isn’t great, but if you plug the iPad in, you can get these things done without further outlay.

I didn’t want to update my iPad 3 to iOS9 but did so when All 4 (or 4OD as it was then) would no longer allow me to view content. I was even using Safari to log into one of my bank accounts prior, to avoid the OS update that their app needed. That allowed it to function for my purposes for a bit longer, but of course the same happened to iOS9 eventually and an upgrade was needed, as the iPad wouldn’t go any higher.

You could argue that’s not Apple’s fault, it’s not currently up to them when an app developer decides to stop earlier versions from working.
 

sunking101

macrumors 604
Sep 19, 2013
7,423
2,659
And this is partly why iPads cost more than a supposedly equivalent Samsung Galaxy tablet. iPads and iPadOS have a longer life expectancy.
In what way(s) do they last longer? My 2 year old Samsung Tab S7 is better built, snappier, keeps things in memory longer, has a better display and longer battery life than the iPad Mini 6 I bought this year.

I am in no rush to update the superb Samsung tablet but will update the Mini in a heartbeat should Apple release a newer version. It is crying out for more RAM (a common Apple 'oversight') and a better display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rhinosrcool

Warped9

macrumors 68000
Oct 27, 2018
1,723
2,414
Brockville, Ontario.
I got lots of people coming in with old, but still working iPads. I see very few with old, but still functioning Samsungs.

Yes, there are always exception, but I usually see 3-4 year old Samsungs replaced while the iPads are usually 5-7 years old.

Big plus is not having Android. Everytime I see one I can’t help but think, “Who designed this crap?”
 

dwaltwhit

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
1,201
2,230
Tennessee
The life of an iPad does not end with the end of OS updates. It ends when the (last) owner thinks that it has no use anymore... (because of hardware or software reasons).
So that's the first thing that should be dissociated (and unfortuantely is often confused on this forum), end of OS updates and end of usable life....
Having said that the usable life of iPads (regadless of how long they are supported) is much longer now than it was 10 or 12 years ago...
Agreed! I have an ipad that topped out at ios 12. I use it as my alarm clock and light browsing at night. Not fast, but it suits a need.
 

sunking101

macrumors 604
Sep 19, 2013
7,423
2,659
I got lots of people coming in with old, but still working iPads. I see very few with old, but still functioning Samsungs.

Yes, there are always exception, but I usually see 3-4 year old Samsungs replaced while the iPads are usually 5-7 years old.

Big plus is not having Android. Everytime I see one I can’t help but think, “Who designed this crap?”
I prefer Android but use both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rhinosrcool

Klae17

macrumors 65816
Jul 15, 2011
1,253
1,806
Not having other options less than five shows a statistical bias. Lame.
 

Digitalguy

macrumors 601
Apr 15, 2019
4,640
4,468
I dunno. I'm finding Sandy Bridge to Skylake (even with 16GB RAM) quite sluggish now compared to A12+ iPads, Ryzen 5000 and Intel 11th gen (even the quad-core 1135G7).
I didn't mean it's as fast modern laptops, but when I replaced it as my main on the go device in 2017 with a 7th gen i7 (dual core) I didn't see much improvement, this thing is actually faster than my 2017 12in MacBook. But since the 7th gen there was another jump in performance with 8th gen quad cores, so dual core now feel sluggish in comparison.
What I also meant is that back in 2012 it was unthinkable to use a 10 year old laptop for absolutely anything.... My 2002 laptop had 256MB RAM and a single core Pentium 3-like (was AMD) CPU. Totally unusable in 2012. My 2012 laptop is still totally usable, not as fast as current gen, but if I only had that I could definitely get by... Similarly a 2012 iPad is virtually unusable today. A 2022 M2 iPad pro will be totally usable in 2032 (battery really depends on how it is managed and whether it has been replaced or not...). So when people compare 10-12 year old iPads with current ones to draw conclusions on how long current top of the lines will be usable, well, thigs now are totally different...
CPU sucks, too. The oldest iPads had performance similar to, what, early Pentium 3 or 4? The entire iPad hardware was simply way behind x86 back then.

Mind, I skipped the OG iPad precisely because of its low 256MB RAM. It was barely good enough for the iPhone 3GS at 320x240 and it wasn't enough for my iPod touch 4th gen with its tiny 640x480 display. I don't imagine I would enjoy the experience on an iPad at 1024x768.

My rule pre-A7, was to update 1 major iOS version only. With A7/1GB, was okay up to iOS 9. A8X/2GB, I consider fairly decent until iOS 12 (although noticeably laggy compared to the other iPads with faster chipset and same 2GB RAM).
True, RAM was not the only culprit, ARM processors were way inferior to Intel back then, then started catching up with the introduction of the iPad pro. Already with A12X they were on par with laptops quad core 8th gen chip from the same period, but still half the RAM of the typical laptop. It was only with M1 that they really achieved total parity in terms of RAM and even overtook Intel for some time in terms of power (of course I am not even talking of performance per watt...)
 

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,915
13,259
I didn't mean it's as fast modern laptops, but when I replaced it as my main on the go device in 2017 with a 7th gen i7 (dual core) I didn't see much improvement, this thing is actually faster than my 2017 12in MacBook. But since the 7th gen there was another jump in performance with 8th gen quad cores, so dual core now feel sluggish in comparison.
What I also meant is that back in 2012 it was unthinkable to use a 10 year old laptop for absolutely anything.... My 2002 laptop had 256MB RAM and a single core Pentium 3-like (was AMD) CPU. Totally unusable in 2012. My 2012 laptop is still totally usable, not as fast as current gen, but if I only had that I could definitely get by... Similarly a 2012 iPad is virtually unusable today. A 2022 M2 iPad pro will be totally usable in 2032 (battery really depends on how it is managed and whether it has been replaced or not...). So when people compare 10-12 year old iPads with current ones to draw conclusions on how long current top of the lines will be usable, well, thigs now are totally different...


I dunno. From Sandy Bridge to Haswell (with Windows 7), I kinda felt like the CPU was so fast that I could use it forever. I like SFF PCs and ultralight laptops a lot so for me, subsequent upgrades meant getting the same performance in a much smaller and lighter device.

Fast forward to around 2017-18(?) when I started buying 4K Blu-ray. All my PCs were unable to play my rips but my Apple TV, iPhone and iPad handled them with ease. Websites have gotten bloated with Javascript. When I finally bought new laptops (along with making the switch to Windows 10 in 2020), I was quite impressed by how much faster and more responsive the new Ryzen laptop was compared to my old 2nd-4th gen Intel.

Of course, Intel stagnated after Haswell. Iirc, performance was pretty much flat with Broadwell (5th gen) and Skylake (6th gen). Kaby Lake (7th gen) improved things a bit but not by much. Good thing AMD and Apple gave them a much needed kick. Intel 12th gen shows a major boost over the 11th gen (which was a big boost over 10th gen to begin with).
 
Last edited:

jchap

macrumors 6502a
Sep 25, 2009
636
1,164
I also don’t want to contribute to the mountains of e-waste western society generates.
Here's a "novel" thought:

If you don't want to contribute to the mountains of e-waste, then why buy any device at all?

Anything we do contributes to waste. Even the human body itself has a natural waste disposal process. In short, waste in some form is an inevitable part of life.

The manufacture of electronic goods is likely a very wasteful process. If you don't want to contribute to that, then your choice as a consumer is to not buy into it. You could try and find the least wasteful manufacturer that seems to be the most concerned about the environment. That does not guarantee zero waste, however.
 

MPclk2006

macrumors 6502a
Sep 20, 2013
523
364
Texas
I was thinking about how long I can use an iPad for, its a convenience device for me, browsing, forumming, reading books and some youtube videos. I don’t want to buy a new model every few years, that just costs money while I have no use for an even better screen or faster processor. I also don’t want to contribute to the mountains of e-waste western society generates.

Instead, shouldn’t we have ipads that last 10-15 years rather than the 5-7 that we get currently?
I don't think "how long should they last" that is the problem, is we as people have become accustomed to upgrading our devices on a way shorter span of time. You have people upgrading all devices every year...I'm not immune to this, I upgrade my phone about every 2 years, 3 max, iPad I use until there is a new one that has a feature my current device cannot do (upgraded from 10.5 to 2020 pro), iMac/Macbook I push to the limit.
 

jchap

macrumors 6502a
Sep 25, 2009
636
1,164
That's the whole point of services. You're not only giving Apple money once for a device purchase. You'll be giving Apple continuously through Apple One subscription, Music, tv, In-app purchases, and of course, accessories. That's how you balance the long life cycle of a product.
Well spoken. The sale of hardware is merely an inroad for selling customers further, more intangible stuff. Of course, there are also the accessories, like cases, sleeves, stands, displays, peripherals, cables, adapters and dongles.

I don’t feel bad at all for Apple if they don’t regularly get my money on hardware purchases. They are getting my money in other ways for the services and software I purchase.
 

3Gmatt

macrumors member
Nov 11, 2008
69
116
Realistically right now the oldest piece of ipad that is okay'ishly usable would be the iPad Air 2 from 2014. It just recently stopped receiving big updates and the A8X can sort of keep up with basic web browsing.

Keep in mind here that it's the web and app-climate that has changed more than the capabilities of the particular iPad. The current iPad pros seem better "futureproofed".
Correct. My Air 2 is on death’s door battery-wise but can still just about keep up with modern streaming requirements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pantherfalcon2332

mectojic

macrumors 65816
Dec 27, 2020
1,330
2,523
Sydney, Australia
I still use my iPad 1st gen from 2010- I count 12 years of use. It still works with Apple servers for iMessage, plays all the vintage games, and even works with Youtube with a small jailbreak patch.
8E5476AA-DAFD-4E8E-9947-9323E5B5CAE2.jpeg
 

Digitalguy

macrumors 601
Apr 15, 2019
4,640
4,468
I dunno. From Sandy Bridge to Haswell (with Windows 7), I kinda felt like the CPU was so fast that I could use it forever. I like SFF PCs and ultralight laptops a lot so for me, subsequent upgrades meant getting the same performance in a much smaller and lighter device.

Fast forward to around 2017-18(?) when I started buying 4K Blu-ray. All my PCs were unable to play my rips but my Apple TV, iPhone and iPad handled them with ease. Websites have gotten bloated with Javascript. When I finally bought new laptops (along with making the switch to Windows 10 in 2020), I was quite impressed by how much faster and more responsive the new Ryzen laptop was compared to my old 2nd-4th gen Intel.

Of course, Intel stagnated after Haswell. Iirc, performance was pretty much flat with Broadwell (5th gen) and Skylake (6th gen). Kaby Lake (7th gen) improved things a bit but not by much. Good thing AMD and Apple gave them a much needed kick. Intel 12th gen shows a major boost over the 11th gen (which was a big boost over 10th gen to begin with).
Same, the move from my 14" 2012 to my 13." 2017 ultrabook was a move from 1.7kg to less than half that (Samsung was the lightest notebook in the world, lighter than the smaller 12" MacBook), not so much power.
My 11" gen Thinkpad is clearly faster. And now even a 12 gen i3 like the i3-1215U is a 6 core beast which is close to M1 in performance.
It's hard to predict the long term future, but currents laptops, as long as they have a quad core or better chip and at least 16GB RAM or even better 32GB, and iPads with M-series chips have quite a bit of headroom over software for non intensive tasks and will probably last a good decade for those tasks (I am not considering OS support as nobody knows at this point how long Windows 11/12, MacOS on current devices or iPads will be supported), which was not always the case in the past, and definitely not for iPads.
 

rkuo

macrumors 65816
Sep 25, 2010
1,308
955
The lifespan should be whatever the hardware allows. Apple’s been very bad about intentionally obsoleting older Mac’s for what seems to be profit driven reasons. On the iOS side I think the approach has been pretty reasonable.

I don’t personally like using operating systems that aren’t being constant attention. The world moves quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus

Populus

macrumors 603
Aug 24, 2012
5,925
8,403
Spain, Europe
The lifespan should be whatever the hardware allows. Apple’s been very bad about intentionally obsoleting older Mac’s for what seems to be profit driven reasons. On the iOS side I think the approach has been pretty reasonable.

I don’t personally like using operating systems that aren’t being constant attention. The world moves quickly.
I agree that iOS devices have received better attention and support than macOS lately, but I think this is related to the transition of the Mac to the Apple Silicon platform.

My old 2010 MacBook Pro received support until High Sierra, which was released in September 2017, the last versions being released in 2018. That’s 8 years of software support. And two additional years of security patches and Safari updates, reaching a total of ten years.

I honestly don’t expect less than that on the new Apple Silicon Macs
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jchap

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,638
Indonesia
10 years of being functional. By functional I don’t mean being a great experience, because obviously there will be technological improvements and there’s a price to be paid if you want the latest and greatest. I mean getting done what you need to do: banking, shopping, looking things up, watching TV shows. A degraded battery isn’t great, but if you plug the iPad in, you can get these things done without further outlay.

I didn’t want to update my iPad 3 to iOS9 but did so when All 4 (or 4OD as it was then) would no longer allow me to view content. I was even using Safari to log into one of my bank accounts prior, to avoid the OS update that their app needed. That allowed it to function for my purposes for a bit longer, but of course the same happened to iOS9 eventually and an upgrade was needed, as the iPad wouldn’t go any higher.

You could argue that’s not Apple’s fault, it’s not currently up to them when an app developer decides to stop earlier versions from working.
It's not Apple's fault if app developer simply had set certain minimum hardware requirements for their apps. Many games already set minimum requirements above the OS. However, it's completely within Apple's control to optimize the OS and at least provide secure usage (eg browser) on their devices.

MacOS, a more capable OS, is scalable from devices as low as Intel 2 core with 4GB if RAM up to M1 Ultra beast. There's really no reason for a slimmer OS of ipadOS couldn't be scalable for older device to remain smooth and usable. Also, in macOS, I can simply use 3rd party browser if the included Safari is no longer secure. Since it's Apple's decision to lock out other browsers in iOS, thus it's their responsibility to provide secure browser. But devices stuck in older iPadOS are also stuck with older Safari for some reason. I don't see how Apple couldn't decouple Safari and at least patch it independently from the OS.
 
Last edited:

one more

macrumors 603
Aug 6, 2015
5,153
6,572
Earth
In my experience, iPads already have excellent longevity compared to some other Apple products. Our iPad Air 1 still runs with its original battery. Safari is sluggish, but YouTube app still works. This is 9 years today. Try getting that sort of a lifespan from their AirPods!

Regarding e-waste, don’t buy stuff if you do not need it or pass over things you no longer use. This stretches far beyond iPads, though, including all sorts of other objects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jchap

jchap

macrumors 6502a
Sep 25, 2009
636
1,164
Since it's Apple's decision to lock out other browsers in iOS, thus it's their responsibility to provide secure browser. But devices stuck in older iPadOS are also stuck with older Safari for some reason. I don't see how Apple couldn't decouple Safari and at least patch it independently from the OS.
Safari has its hooks into a large portion of the OS, as I understand it. Anything that renders content using Safari's rendering engine (WebKit) would need to be updated or patched, I would imagine. IE in Windows used to be the same—it was a component of the OS that you couldn't simply delete or uninstall. I don't know the specifics of how Web traffic is routed through Safari's various components on macOS, but as it's something that users can't readily delete (especitally with SIP enabled), I would imagine that it's a rather critical component.
 

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
I am running most current dev Betas on iPad Mini 5, 2020 iPP 12.9”, and iPhone 14 PM. Previosly was running 16 betas on iPhone 11 PM, and 15 Dev Betas on iPhone 11 PM.
Firstly, performance is currently fine, especially on the devices you mentioned. The 14 Pro Max is too new, but how’s battery life on the Mini 5 and the 5th Gen iPad Pro? Is it exactly the same as it was on iOS 12 and iPadOS 13 respectively? Have you measured it?
 

FeliApple

macrumors 68040
Apr 8, 2015
3,684
2,088
Safari has its hooks into a large portion of the OS, as I understand it. Anything that renders content using Safari's rendering engine (WebKit) would need to be updated or patched, I would imagine. IE in Windows used to be the same—it was a component of the OS that you couldn't simply delete or uninstall. I don't know the specifics of how Web traffic is routed through Safari's various components on macOS, but as it's something that users can't readily delete (especitally with SIP enabled), I would imagine that it's a rather critical component.
Yeah this is the only issue of staying on older versions of iOS for me. I wish we could update Safari, or even if we can’t, I wish it wouldn‘t require updates so quickly. iOS 10 is unusable by now. iOS 12 is decent, but I fear that might change, very quickly. There are some websites that don’t work already. I’m barely four versions behind. When I upgraded my iPad to the Air 5, it was a joy to see that I could access anything, that never happens to me, there’s always some website that fails to load or doesn’t work properly. That might change though because I am already outdated (iPadOS 15), I only had like two months in which I was fully updated (got Air 5 in August, iPadOS 16 was released in October). I hope it lasts for a while.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jchap

Eggtastic

macrumors 65816
Jun 9, 2009
1,052
702
NJ
7-10 business days.

Jokes aside, my mom's ipad is 7 years old now and shes been eyeing a new one for a bit now. Her uses are light but may benefit from a bigger screen and faster UI.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.