Yes, I'm new.
Oh and btw, the guy talking about the displays. 100% dead on. I had my MacBook Pro docked in a Henge Dock 90% of the time and connected to a 30 inch Cinema Display I got off ebay. Worked beautifully for my graphic design work and my photography hobby.
I have a home office with a lot of windows, and glass displays are not appealing.
It seems as Apple used being trendy and hip to revitalize itself and now it's completely moved into the consumer market and away from those segments that originally supported it the most.
Spot on. My issue(s) isn't/aren't so much w/ Lion (it's faster, smaller footprint and does have some better incorporated features) but w/ Apple's discontinuation of their GREAT hardware for professionals.
The display line being one. The LED LCD display is a great buy, esp for LED backlit panels. As a graphic and film designer/editor I loved the ACD CCFL LCD anti-glare line (had 2 x 23" ACD displays w/ my Power Mac G's then Mac Pro's). Both lasted 7 years! I debated the 24" LED LCD for glare issues, spent mo's researching and tried 2 24" Dell displays (horrible, dead pixels, uneven panels). Dell was GREAT at a full refund. I need two so EIZO's were out. bought the Apple 24" LED LCD and placed it next to one of my 23" CCFL LCD's and loved it. The anti-glare displays tend to diffuse pixels while the Apple display (it's not "glossy", just a glass front without anti-glare finish) allows for more color accuracy/editing.
I got another 24" when they went on sale as the 24" iMac was replaced w/ the 27" (Apple uses the same LED LCD panel in the larger iMac's which is why there is only 1 display now offered). The glare isn't an issue, but I got a hood (examples:
Computer Monitor Hoods) that almost all professionals use any ways.
Otherwise, agreed. The discontinuation of a dedicated display line, Xserve, expensive Mac Pro's (my old design/architecture firm used PowerMac's as they were affordable, but couldn't afford Mac Pro's due to the leap in price), etc. doesn't bode well for us (consumers and new-comers to Apple may not understand our stance).
Oh well, Apple is doing well and going after the larger consumer market. Some claim the professional market is smaller, sure, but when businesses buy in larger quantities (such as 5, 10, even 20 Mac's) it adds up, so quantity of purchases counters the smaller market. Using some of that $50 billion to develop more displays to sell with their Mac Mini's and Mac Pro's instead of 1 27" model with short cables (and an odd screen ratio) and not enough ports or an anti-glare option means people will either hesitate in buying a Mini or Pro as they don't have a display or want to buy one elsewhere or perhaps will buy 'em elsewhere. Either way, it wouldn't be a fail but a win/win.