Good luck doing that. You will need plenty of it.
Plenty of what?
Good luck doing that. You will need plenty of it.
Being able to remove apps from your phone is the same thing as remote control, because it involves remote access. Again, you didn't read your own article.Apple has always been able to blacklist apps and has never hidden that ability. It is one thing to blacklist apps and another to secretly remotely operate a phone. The authors know this but included it as a false equivalence (to appear unbiased). Making it worse is that Android/google already have a business model that monetizes your data. Remember, you aren’t google’s customer, advertisers are. This is all a bit too invasive for me and a prime reason Android devices remain unappealing.
No, it isn’t. A mechanism that blacklists apps is not wholesale access to device. Android appears to allow google to go in and change any settings and possibly other things. Given google’s business model and history of invasiveness, there is potential for far greater shadiness than deactivating a bad app.Being able to remove apps from your phone is the same thing as remote control, because it involves remote access. Again, you didn't read your own article.
Yes, it is. Removing software from your phone, or "disabling it", requires full administrative access to the device.No, it isn’t. A mechanism that blacklists apps is not wholesale access to device. Android appears to allow google to go in and change any settings and possibly other things. Given google’s business model and history of invasiveness, there is potential for far greater shadiness than deactivating a bad app.
It is not the same for several reasons. The biggest is that Apple cannot change your settings or read information from the device remotely. They can only unsign an offending application, this does not require administrative privilege and is not a back door. macOS works the same way. What google appears to have is a back door that allows them to modify settings (and likely any data) remotely, without authorization or notification.Yes, it is. Removing software from your phone, or "disabling it", requires full administrative access to the device.
Good for you and welcome (back?) to the iPhone! I would say that the color of the Gold is more of a coppery blush.Not sure. Best picture I have found that shows both sides.
![]()
LOLHere we go...![]()
It is not the same for several reasons. The biggest is that Apple cannot change your settings or read information from the device remotely. They can only unsign an offending application, this does not require administrative privilege and is not a back door. macOS works the same way. What google appears to have is a back door that allows them to modify settings (and likely any data) remotely, without authorization or notification.
Another reason this is different is Apple makes it a point to respect your data while google’s revenue is largely based on selling your information. Who is more likely to abuse access to user data?
No, Apple revokes the signing for the damn app so it cannot run. It does not happen locally and does not require administrative privileges on the phone. It is the same as macOS. Certificate validation is a part of security. Don’t believe me? Try to run an unsigned kext on your Mac. Same deal. Whereas google is changing settings/data remotely on the phone and not simply blacklisting nefarious apps. What google is doing is editing data on the phone.Whatever excuses you have doesn't negate the fact that apple can remotely control your phone. This operation requires elevated privilege.
You can hide your head in the sand and say it is different from google if that makes you feel more (false sense) secured.
They can change any setting they want, and have done so before. Removing software from your phone, or "disabling it", requires full administrative access to the device.It is not the same for several reasons. The biggest is that Apple cannot change your settings or read information from the device remotely. They can only unsign an offending application, this does not require administrative privilege and is not a back door. macOS works the same way. What google appears to have is a back door that allows them to modify settings (and likely any data) remotely, without authorization or notification.
Another reason this is different is Apple makes it a point to respect your data while google’s revenue is largely based on selling your information. Who is more likely to abuse access to user data?
Removing software from your phone, or "disabling it", requires full administrative access to the device.
For whatever reason we are not going to agree. Let’s try analogy:They can change any setting they want, and have done so before. Removing software from your phone, or "disabling it", requires full administrative access to the device.
Same here, but I went with the XS. Battery life was bad on the Note 9 for me also, especially stand-by..I've cratered, and decided to return my Note 9, and Galaxy Watch to Best Buy Friday morning when I go pick up my new iPhone Xs Max Gold 512gb phone. I will probably pick up a watch then or order it. Haven't decided on the color watch since I am unsure if the Gold Color would look right on a guy...I am use to Silver/Black watches.
The Note 9 started having issues recently, that I decided, while I can, to get out. Best Buy gave me 30 days so, I may just have to pay the return fee for $30, but that's it.
1. Camera constantly locking up. (Big issue among the Samsung/Reddit boards).
2. Battery drain suddenly.
3. My Insurance Drive Safe app will not work any longer on the phone and my insurance company is useless trying to figure it out. Either my rate goes up by $60 a month or I switch phones.
4. Everyone in my family has iPhones, so it only makes sense to stay with the eco system.
Figured, since I had to pre-order it, I used my AT&T next plan upgrade to get it, then once I get my money back from returning it, I'll pay it off or use it to get the watch and just pay the $50 a month on.
But it's equally true that the blind faith some users have to Apple allowed them to change settings unknowingly to users that raised the recent class actions, although not remotelyNo, it isn’t. A mechanism that blacklists apps is not wholesale access to device. Android appears to allow google to go in and change any settings and possibly other things. Given google’s business model and history of invasiveness, there is potential for far greater shadiness than deactivating a bad app.
From the sounds some are having camera issues on the note 9
Yeah, the camera is having major issues of freezing/locking up. It did it on my at a concert and pissed me off as I didn't get many good videos because of it. Here is the large topic that I am aware of.
https://us.community.samsung.com/t5...ns-and/Note-9-camera-freezes/m-p/388491#M1713
Yeah, the camera is having major issues of freezing/locking up. It did it on mine at a concert and pissed me off as I didn't get many good videos because of it. Here is the large topic that I am aware of.
https://us.community.samsung.com/t5...ns-and/Note-9-camera-freezes/m-p/388491#M1713
I have no issue with camera.
I did notice sometimes camera is slow to launch. This is related to turning on embed GPS info to photo. Acquiring GPS takes times. So I have turned that option off and now no issue.
I think certain posters who come into the iPhone forum saying how great the note 9 is would never admit if there was a problem even if there clearly was lolYou wouldn’t know that based off some of the posters here.
Op your not alone, a lot of YouTube personalities are switching to iPhones.
I find that comical.
You just haven't noticed it yet. Try to crank up your video to 4k, and start recording for a while and it will start to happen. Some it happens sooner than others. Mine didn't start till I actually started using the video for a 5-10 minutes. There is enough evidence that the phone has issues with the camera in that link, and Samsung acknowledged it.
I think certain posters who come into the iPhone forum saying how great the note 9 is would never admit if there was a problem even if there clearly was lol
Since the iPhone Xs Max is a fake 6.5" display we need to use surface area as a unit instead.
The poster won’t acknowledge it , but android phones are not capable of recording 4k@60fps for more than 5 Minutes. Samsung should disclose it but they don’t.
As far as I know only the iPhone is capable.
Never admitting is one thing, but most of those posters often post a lot of fud believing macrumors members to be gullible.
It’s dishonest, here is an example.
His assertion to use surface area to measure a display size is comical and silly.
I wasn't using 60. 30 fps at 4k mine was set too and it did it.
[doublepost=1537735080][/doublepost]Here is a link to the video I had that started to do it in.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/191nWxqu83rzE68p2mpZLwdx1RNlvepX3/view?usp=sharing
Yeah, forgot to mention 4k @ 30 fps doesn't have a time limit. 60 fps does for whatever reason.Oh wow, didn’t know that thanks for sharing.
Yeah, forgot to mention 4k @ 30 fps doesn't have a time limit. 60 fps does for whatever reason.