Can't even take pictures of your own kids apparently...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...vert--photographing-children-public-park.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...vert--photographing-children-public-park.html
things like this are happening everywhere as people become more and more concerned about their privacy.
This blows my mind because it's something that I never even would have thought of if I was in that guys shoes. Crazy!
I don't think that is the problem. The problem is that the gutter press has convinced the idiots out there that anyone who points a camera at a child (even if it's their own kid) is a paedophile.
I've been questioned a few times about taking photos in public, and it's always easier to be polite and honest; if they're the kind of person who'll still kick-off faced with courtesy they're the kind to kick-off extremely when faced with your reaction.**** off would be the correct thing to tell her
Yes pedophiles are a problem, but in the story you just told the problem was the woman's attitude and paranoia. Which in this instance was 'real' the pedophile or the paranoia?...The real problem is the sick friggin pedophiles.
I'd be interested in knowing why those other parents made (what appears to be) such an odd assumption.
Quite ridiculous I must say. It is rather sad that people suspect you to be doing 'wrong' things if you have a camera. *shame shame*
F**k off would be the correct thing to tell her
Dunno why people spend upto $4000 on a camera?
I for one wont spend $4000 to be called a 'pervert'!
**** off would be the correct thing to tell her