Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
2w makes or breaks the charging experience!?!?!? Give me a break. Call the Whambulance.
In certain situations (e.g. iPad Pro 12.9 or iPad 3/4 in active use), it's the difference between charging and not charging.

I do understand why Apple uses different suppliers and it's not that big a deal for 10" class iPads with their lower power draw and smaller batteries. I do think 12W should at least be standard for the iPad Pro 12.9. Heck, many posters already complained the Pro didn't come with the 29W fast charger + USB-C cable.
 
Exactly, not much difference and people act like it's a make or break experience with charging times between the two.
 
Your perception is wrong. The thread is about the iPad's 10W charger, not the device.
We could argue semantics all day long but I have no time or interest doing that. You are free understand this thread the way you want. I understand it as concern 10W charger with iPad 2018 being slow, which my findings with my prevoius Air + 12W charger vs my new 2018 + 10W charger do not support. I do not see any practical difference in total charging time. They both take even 4 hours from empty to full charge (iPad not in use while charging).

The quoted words of steve23094 addressed to you are relevant as you started a debate based on your "bet" that there was no difference between the chargers, though you don't have a 12W charger and never tested it with your iPad
Have you actually made ANY research of your own regarding this issue? I have done that and released results in this thread. When you will do the same?
P.S.: What a discrepancy in the light of your post #36 that your own first reply (#10) deals with the chargers and not the device.
Again semantics. My posts are related iPad 2018 or Air and mentioned chargers with those and nothing else. Surely 12W charger is more powerful if used with device taking full advantage from it. I don’t think with 2018 you get any really noticeable difference.
 
Last edited:
Again semantics. My posts are related iPad 2018 or Air and mentioned chargers with those and nothing else. Surely 12W charger is more powerful if used with device taking full advantage from it. I don’t think with 2018 you get any really noticeable difference.
It's a 20% difference so at best, that's what one can expect.

For a device that takes 6 hours to charge, that drops charging time down to 5 hours. For a device that takes 3 hours to charge, it only drops charging time by 30 minutes. Of course, that's assuming the circuitry on the device can draw more power (which the iPad is expected to).
[doublepost=1528763465][/doublepost]
I have been monitoring battery a lot after having problems with previous units battery weakening very fast, I have also kept track of charging. I noticed that even with 10W charger iPad 2018 never pulls more than around 8,5W during charging. I don't have 12W charger here so I cannot test if it would be any different with that but I doubt, since 10W is able to give you that, so why not pulling even 10W? I bet it does not make any difference in charging time whether you use 10W or 12W with 2018 model.

Anyone want to study their machine charging habits, just download Windows application called iMazing (free part of the software is enough for battery monitoring and give very detailed information about battery and charger, it even tells you the battery serial number and vendor). It would be interesting to hear what results it gives with 12W charger and iPad 2018?
Here is something I don't quite understand. If you have the iPad connected to PC and are monitoring load via iMazing, how are you charging it via Apple's 10W charger? Isn't the 8.5W figure therefore the load pulled via the USB port on your computer and not the Apple charger?

Mind, on my 2017 iPad, iMazing reports 8557 mAh design capacity as well. Interestingly enough, iMazing reported Max battery charge: 2446 mAh and Max battery discharge: -3119 mAh so it looks like with an extremely heavy workload, it's possible for the iPad to be losing charge even when plugged in to a 12W charger.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ulenspiegel
Around 90% efficiency is pretty good. That suggests power draw at USB to be around 9.4W.
seems pretty close based on the results you posted after this. Maybe charging circuit efficiency is worse than that or 2018 is slightly different from 2017 and the numbers in it would be different in this test. Maybe if you could try iMazing with your 2017 and see what is says we would know if charging circuit is the same or not.

Based on the Wh ratings on Apple's product information, I do believe 8820 mAh actual capacity is accurate. 32.9Wh / 3.73V = 8820 mAh. Do you notice how when you leave the iPad charging overnight and it's 100% when you unplug. Going from 100% to 99% takes a long time but from 99% to 98% or 98% to 97% doesn't take as long? I think 8557 might be design capacity or 100% and the extra 200 or so mAh is allowance/contingency.
I have been relying to that photo myself and been wondering why design charge is smaller than that in 2018. If design charge has always been lower than 8827 mAh I’m sure ios battery apps would have got that corrected. I don’t think think they are relying to tear down test battery images when determing design capacity since they could have checked that by PC apps pulling detailed battery information. It maybe due to reasons you mention. I actually said in another thread that maybe apple is ”underclocking” battery somehow. But if that is the case I would expect all battery ios apps knowing this but still they assume it is 8820, so maybe they have slightly different size batteries. Based on iMazing battery details there are different vendor batteries around.

I do noticed first drop from 100% taking longer even I never charge overnight. As long as battery is charged until it is really full, like when iMazing reports battery full and it shows discharging instead of charging.


I don't believe that's it. For one thing, you wouldn't have people complaining that the 10W charges the 2018 iPad slower than the 12W if that's the case. That's partly what this thread is about.
Is there really anyone complaining that they have measured actual difference in charging time? From OP’s post I could not determine if he actually tested it somehow or just assumed it slower since it came with 10W charger.
Like I have said. I do not see any difference between Air + 12W and 2018 + 10W in charging time and I never just left is plugged overnight. So even theoritically 12W should be faster it does not make noticeable difference between those devices. Surely some 12.9 Pro is likely getting some small benefit from 2W more.

Unless you're actually measuring time, I doubt it's going to be all that noticeable. Theoretically, at 100% efficiency and 0 load, full charge will take around 3:15 on 10W charger and 2:45 on 12W charger. Not something most people would notice.

Obviously, that doesn't take into account actual inefficiencies, standby/use power consumption, trickle charging, etc. For someone doing last minute app updates or downloads while the device is charging before a long trip, the impact of those extra 2W may be more significant.
Like I mentioned, i have tested Air and 2018 and they take 4 hours from empty to full. I think charging circuit has effect on that due to constant monitoring and trickle charging at the end causes that efficiently charging time is pretty much identical between the two.
[doublepost=1528766727][/doublepost]
It's a 20% difference so at best, that's what one can expect.
I agree, it will be the most and only when device can take full advantage of that extra and not just waste that by doing some adjustments to cause charging time not changing noticeable at all.

Here is something I don't quite understand. If you have the iPad connected to PC and are monitoring load via iMazing, how are you charging it via Apple's 10W charger? Isn't the 8.5W figure therefore the load pulled via the USB port on your computer and not the Apple charger?
No because once you have paired pc and iMazing with usb cable you can then access the same information by wifi, so you are able to monitor charging with different chargers.

Mind, on my 2017 iPad, iMazing reports 8557 mAh design capacity as well.
This is interesting. Have they been like this always,or are there different capacity batteries installed in some units?

Interestingly enough, iMazing reported Max battery charge: 2446 mAh and Max battery discharge: -3119 mAh so it looks like with an extremely heavy workload, it's possible for the iPad to be losing charge even when plugged in to a 12W charger.
I noticed those extreme values and they were there already when units was straight out of the box. I think they do some tests at the factory.
 
I have been relying to that photo myself and been wondering why design charge is smaller than that in 2018. If design charge has always been lower than 8827 mAh I’m sure ios battery apps would have got that corrected. I don’t think think they are relying to tear down test battery images when determing design capacity since they could have checked that by PC apps pulling detailed battery information. It maybe due to reasons you mention. I actually said in another thread that maybe apple is ”underclocking” battery somehow. But if that is the case I would expect all battery ios apps knowing this but still they assume it is 8820, so maybe they have slightly different size batteries. Based on iMazing battery details there are different vendor batteries around.
Or perhaps iOS battery life apps simply don't have access to design capacity information (same with charge cycles, etc) and what Apple allows them to see is just original battery capacity and current max capacity.

Is there really anyone complaining that they have measured actual difference in charging time? From OP’s post I could not determine if he actually tested it somehow or just assumed it slower since it came with 10W charger.
Like I have said. I do not see any difference between Air + 12W and 2018 + 10W in charging time and I never just left is plugged overnight. So even theoritically 12W should be faster it does not make noticeable difference between those devices. Surely some 12.9 Pro is likely getting some small benefit from 2W more.
Like I mentioned, i have tested Air and 2018 and they take 4 hours from empty to full. I think charging circuit has effect on that due to constant monitoring and trickle charging at the end causes that efficiently charging time is pretty much identical between the two.
No idea. This test would take hours so I can't really be bothered to actually test charging times scientifically.

I agree, it will be the most and only when device can take full advantage of that extra and not just waste that by doing some adjustments to cause charging time not changing noticeable at all.
Hmm, a better comparison might be from 0-80% or 0-50%. The devices shouldn't be trickle charging at those levels. Again though, those tests would take too long.

Hmm, a practical test would be measuring top up charge for, say, 15-30 minutes while syncing a bunch videos with Plex or Infuse or something.

No because once you have paired pc and iMazing with usb cable you can then access the same information by wifi, so you are able to monitor charging with different chargers.
Will test again tomorrow and include readings from iMazing.

This is interesting. Have they been like this always,or are there different capacity batteries installed in some units?
I don't think they use different capacities. Again, this 5th gen iPad (2017) that showed 8557 mAh design capacity in iMazing is the same one that reported 8820 mAh capacity in the Battery Life iOS app.

I noticed those extreme values and they were there already when units was straight out of the box. I think they do some tests at the factory.
Reckon they do. Does your 2018 iPad also show 2446 mAh in max battery charge? Then that likely means it's capable of drawing 2.4A from a charger with sufficient power output.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulenspiegel
I feel you man. Cook is just out for money. Don't know when will his greed be satisfied.
Cook has always been a money man. He was hired out from Compaq to be just that, Chief Operating Officer, before that he closed factories and hired contract workers to benefit the bottom line.

I'm all for it when you are running the line, but I believe Apple is closing in on a Trillion Dollars. Maybe that will allow a couple 100 billion to be pushed towards research and possibly solve world hunger and cancer as well.

The charger shipped actually seem pretty random. Apple's shipping both 10W and 12W simultaneously.
I just ran through a little over 1000 iPads 6th generation and all of them have the 12w adapters. I have another 100 that just came in last night, I will see if they are 12w or 10w and report back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rui no onna
Cook has always been a money man. He was hired out from Compaq to be just that, Chief Operating Officer, before that he closed factories and hired contract workers to benefit the bottom line.

I'm all for it when you are running the line, but I believe Apple is closing in on a Trillion Dollars. Maybe that will allow a couple 100 billion to be pushed towards research and possibly solve world hunger and cancer as well.

I just ran through a little over 1000 iPads 6th generation and all of them have the 12w adapters. I have another 100 that just came in last night, I will see if they are 12w or 10w and report back.

I suspect that it has something to do with location. I’m in Canada, and so far every one of the dozen 6th Gen iPads I have handled has come with a 10w charger.
 
We could argue semantics all day long but I have no time or interest doing that. You are free understand this thread the way you want. I understand it as concern 10W charger with iPad 2018 being slow, which my findings with my prevoius Air + 12W charger vs my new 2018 + 10W charger do not support. I do not see any practical difference in total charging time. They both take even 4 hours from empty to full charge (iPad not in use while charging).
Have you actually made ANY research of your own regarding this issue? I have done that and released results in this thread. When you will do the same?
Again semantics. My posts are related iPad 2018 or Air and mentioned chargers with those and nothing else. Surely 12W charger is more powerful if used with device taking full advantage from it. I don’t think with 2018 you get any really noticeable difference. We could argue semantics all day long but I have no time or interest doing that. You are free understand this thread the way you want. I understand it as concern 10W charger with iPad 2018 being slow, which my findings with my prevoius Air + 12W charger vs my new 2018 + 10W charger do not support. I do not see any practical difference in total charging time. They both take even 4 hours from empty to full charge (iPad not in use while charging).
Have you actually made ANY research of your own regarding this issue? I have done that and released results in this thread. When you will do the same?
Again semantics. My posts are related iPad 2018 or Air and mentioned chargers with those and nothing else. Surely 12W charger is more powerful if used with device taking full advantage from it. I don’t think with 2018 you get any really noticeable difference.

Your escape-route does not work as I have made it clear in my previous post.
It's not semantics, it is a phenomenon when one's standpoint is based on "bet" and "doubt" and when proven wrong tries in a pathetic way to deviate the main topic of the the discussion.

As you have stated in your post #10, you don't have a 12W charger and have not tested it with your current 2018 iPad.
...I don't have 12W charger here so I cannot test if it would be any different with that but I doubt, since 10W is able to give you that, so why not pulling even 10W? I bet it does not make any difference in charging time whether you use 10W or 12W...
I would advice you refraining from stating false facts.
Number of tests were presented to you, but you turn a blind eye on the results and keep repeating the same with a twist.
 
Last edited:
Your escape-route does not work as I have made it clear in my previous post.
It's not semantics, it is a phenomenon when one's standpoint is based on "bet" and "doubt" and when proven wrong tries in a pathetic way to deviate the main topic of the the discussion.

As you have stated in your post #10, you don't have a 12W charger and have not tested it with your current 2018 iPad.

I would advice you refraining from stating false facts.
Number of tests were presented to you, but you turn a blind eye on the results and keep repeating the same with a twist.
Wow, is this modern day road rage or what. I have no interest keep repeating myself to you. I already explained you everything and still you keep insisting you know better than I what I said or meant by saying something. Give it a rest, I'm not continuing this with you any longer. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Wow, is this modern day road rage or what. I have no interest keep repeating myself to you. I already explained you everything and still you keep insisting you know better than I what I said or meant by saying something. Give it a rest, I'm not continuing this with you any longer.
Charging time in theory would be 20% less with the 12W vs. the 10W but that isn't technically true since the '10W' charger is actually a 10.71W charger (5.1V x 2.1A). The '12W' charger is outputting 12.48W (5.2V x 2.4A) meaning the 12W iPad charger outputs 16.5% more power over the 10W charger and would charge the device 16.5% faster...
To conclude our amicable debate may I remind you that the above is physics and in this case proven by numerous reviews as well as tests that were presented to you in this thread.

It is your personal choice whether you accept the laws of phsysics and experiments proving that there is a difference between a 10W and a 12W charger in case of iPads, even if this difference is - relatively - not substantial.

Last but not least, I very much regret that you kept only repeating yourself instead of paying attention to what other members shared with you.
 
Or perhaps iOS battery life apps simply don't have access to design capacity information (same with charge cycles, etc) and what Apple allows them to see is just original battery capacity and current max capacity.
Could be but I still think that since there is this design value (like shown in iMazing) I believe that is where it should be read what battery capacity really is. I mean if there would be another value programmed there, it would be shown in iMazing too, I think. Also I have been using other IOS app called Battery (Ken Ken) and it does detect max capacity different way, for example when battery from my previous unit was down several 100 mAh,s it kept saying 100%/100% condition, so maybe that max capacity value those apps use is just programmed there based on the model which they can detect and they cannot snoop from charger circuit more detailed information anymore.

Still if battery has label saying capacity is 8827 mAh I don't understand why that is not used as design value, is it for some reason "underclocked" then or is there simply several slightly different size batteries produced from different vendors. I don't know.


Hmm, a better comparison might be from 0-80% or 0-50%. The devices shouldn't be trickle charging at those levels. Again though, those tests would take too long.
Maybe. I had short time iPad 2017 also which also came with 10W adapter and back then I measured some intervals like you mention but there was no mentionable difference. I usually charge my iPad to 100% and in that procedure I don't see difference. I have noticed that charging circuit does regulate charging many ways (like device was hot from use when put to charger, or room temp was somewhat higher than last time etc...), so when I usually charge up to 100% it can take about the same time even starting percentage was not the same.

Hmm, a practical test would be measuring top up charge for, say, 15-30 minutes while syncing a bunch videos with Plex or Infuse or something.
I agree. That's possibly where difference could show more.

Will test again tomorrow and include readings from iMazing.
OK. So then we will get better understanding if the charging circuits are identical between the models if iMazing give you the same readings as mine.

Reckon they do. Does your 2018 iPad also show 2446 mAh in max battery charge? Then that likely means it's capable of drawing 2.4A from a charger with sufficient power output.
My current 2018 shows 2355 mA max battery charge (and 3224 mAh max discharge) but I never charged it with anything else than included 10W charger and I know that is from the factory since I checked this before actually charging the unit myself the first time (other than plugged it to my notebook usb-port. It also showed 8996 mAh battery effective charge - this one came with strong battery that still holds nominal capacity after 2-3 dozen charges while that another I returned already was going down fast after first couple of charges). My previous 2018 I returned due to battery and display issues showed 2223 mAh in max battery charge.
 
Last edited:
Charge level range: 40-50%
Cable: Anker PowerLine+ II Lightning Cable 6ft.


iPad 5th generation (2017)

Apple 5W
Wall: 5.7W
USB Meter: 4.6W
iMazing: 3.2W

Apple 10W

Wall: 12.9W
USB Meter: 9.6W
iMazing: 7.7W

Apple 12W
Wall: 13.9W
USB Meter: 11.5W
iMazing: 8.9W

Apple 10W (direct, no USB Meter)
Wall: 13W
iMazing: 7.9W

Apple 12W (direct, no USB Meter)
Wall: 14.2W
iMazing: 9.2W


Charger specifications reported by iMazing


Apple 5W
Charger: usb brick
Charger Watts: 5
Charger Voltage: 5000 mV
Charger Amperage: 1000 mA

Apple 10W
Charger: usb brick
Charger Watts: 10
Charger Voltage: 5000 mV
Charger Amperage: 2100 mA

Apple 12W
Charger: usb brick
Charger Watts: 12
Charger Voltage: 5000 mV
Charger Amperage: 2400 mA
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulenspiegel
Could be but I still think that since there is this design value (like shown in iMazing) I believe that is where it should be read what battery capacity really is. I mean if there would be another value programmed there, it would be shown in iMazing too, I think. Also I have been using other IOS app called Battery (Ken Ken) and it does detect max capacity different way, for example when battery from my previous unit was down several 100 mAh,s it kept saying 100%/100% condition, so maybe that max capacity value those apps use is just programmed there based on the model which they can detect and they cannot snoop from charger circuit more detailed information anymore.

Still if battery has label saying capacity is 8827 mAh I don't understand why that is not used as design value, is it for some reason "underclocked" then or is there simply several slightly different size batteries produced from different vendors. I don't know.
Here is your post from May 2018. Clearly, iMazing was able to see the original total capacity of ~8820 mAh. Why is it not reported as the original capacity when connected via USB/Wi-Fi while iOS battery health apps report this information? Only Apple knows.

I have been monitoring my second iPad 2018's battery health and this one definitely seems strong.

Here are battery statistics from this one after couple of weeks and several charge cycles:
Battery Design Max. Charge:,8557 mAh
Battery Effective Max. Charge:,8821 mAh (103.1%)



One interesting thing as far as warranty coverage. iPad batteries are covered within the warranty period to retain 80% of capacity within 1000 charge cycles.

8820 mAh * 80% = 7056 mAh
8557 mAh * 80% = 6845.6 mAh

6845.6 / 8820 = 77.6%

I wonder which figure they honor as far as warranty is concerned.
 
Here is your post from May 2018. Clearly, iMazing was able to see the original total capacity of ~8820 mAh. Why is it not reported as the original capacity when connected via USB/Wi-Fi while iOS battery health apps report this information? Only Apple knows.





One interesting thing as far as warranty coverage. iPad batteries are covered within the warranty period to retain 80% of capacity within 1000 charge cycles.

8820 mAh * 80% = 7056 mAh
8557 mAh * 80% = 6845.6 mAh

6845.6 / 8820 = 77.6%

I wonder which figure they honor as far as warranty is concerned.

Design charge.
 
Charge level range: 40-50%
Cable: Anker PowerLine+ II Lightning Cable 6ft.


iPad 5th generation (2017)

Apple 5W
Wall: 5.7W
USB Meter: 4.6W
iMazing: 3.2W

Apple 10W

Wall: 12.9W
USB Meter: 9.6W
iMazing: 7.7W

Apple 12W
Wall: 13.9W
USB Meter: 11.5W
iMazing: 8.9W

Apple 10W (direct, no USB Meter)
Wall: 13W
iMazing: 7.9W

Apple 12W (direct, no USB Meter)
Wall: 14.2W
iMazing: 9.2W


Charger specifications reported by iMazing


Apple 5W
Charger: usb brick
Charger Watts: 5
Charger Voltage: 5000 mV
Charger Amperage: 1000 mA

Apple 10W
Charger: usb brick
Charger Watts: 10
Charger Voltage: 5000 mV
Charger Amperage: 2100 mA

Apple 12W
Charger: usb brick
Charger Watts: 12
Charger Voltage: 5000 mV
Charger Amperage: 2400 mA
Thanks for doing so detailed testing. For some reason iMazing gave you lower charging wattage what I get on my 2018 model. Did you let it be a little while and see if it was still the same? In my unit I see it gradually goes up and about 8.5W is what it is charging battery before going to trickle charging where it gradually drops wattage. Did you keep iPad display off and make sure no background software is doing its things during that.
If all of those check but still iMazing wattage is the same then maybe 2018 model has better efficiency charging circuit.

Even if we go by those numbers we can see that actual battery charging gets only 1.2 - 1.3W more juice for battery. So difference is very small and that does not count any variables that can dimish difference even more, so no wonder why I cannot notice difference in charging time. Especially if we add my 2018 result in the same mix we have only 0.7W difference in charging current what battery gets 10 vs 12W adapterd but of course direct comparison like that is not fair due difference in charging circuit efficiency or what ever is causing the difference.

Here is your post from May 2018. Clearly, iMazing was able to see the original total capacity of ~8820 mAh. Why is it not reported as the original capacity when connected via USB/Wi-Fi while iOS battery health apps report this information? Only Apple knows.
I understood that so that design charge (8557) is equal to battery nominal capacity which should actually be 8827 but it is not at least in all devices. Max charge is just extra capacity that new battery has more or less for a while. For example that max charge in my current unit straight out of the box was almost full 9 amps!! But after first charge it stabilised around 8800. Previous unit with weak battery was dropping down to 8200 max charge within first couple of charges.


ne interesting thing as far as warranty coverage. iPad batteries are covered within the warranty period to retain 80% of capacity within 1000 charge cycles.

8820 mAh * 80% = 7056 mAh
8557 mAh * 80% = 6845.6 mAh

6845.6 / 8820 = 77.6%

I wonder which figure they honor as far as warranty is concerned.
I bet it is counted from design charge.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for doing so detailed testing. For some reason iMazing gave you lower charging wattage what I get on my 2018 model. Did you let it be a little while and see if it was still the same? In my unit I see it gradually goes up and about 8.5W is what it is charging battery before going to trickle charging where it gradually drops wattage. Did you keep iPad display off and make sure no background software is doing its things during that.
If all of those check but still iMazing wattage is the same then maybe 2018 model has better efficiency charging circuit.

Even if we go by those numbers we can see that actual battery charging gets only 1.2 - 1.3W more juice for battery. So difference is very small and that does not count any variables that can dimish difference even more, so no wonder why I cannot notice difference in charging time. Especially if we add my 2018 result in the same mix we have only 0.7W difference in charging current what battery gets 10 vs 12W adapterd but of course direct comparison like that is not fair due difference in charging circuit efficiency or what ever is causing the difference.
iPad display is off. Too much hassle to change settings on the iPad for the test so I didn't bother with that. I didn't have a lot of background tasks anyway. I let charging settle for 1-2 minutes for each test since I didn't want there to be a big difference in charge states between tests. 1.2-1.3W may not seem like much but that's around 16.5% difference in this case.

Also, your iPad likely wouldn't be charging at just 9.2W. It seems like mine is around 80% efficiency while yours is 85%. With a 12W charger, you'd be charging at an estimated 10.2W.

Going by the numbers I got, charging from 0-80% on my 2017 iPad would take an estimated 3:20 at 7.9W and 2:50 at 9.2W or around 30 minutes difference.

Here's a theoretical scenario: 2 hours of charge time charges my 2017 iPad to 48% with 10W charger and 56% with 12W charger. With dimmest setting, I get around 16 hours battery life on the 2017 iPad when reading ebooks so that's approximately 6.25% battery usage per hour. That translates to 2 hours of charge giving me 7:40 reading time on 10W adapter and almost 8:55 reading time on 12W adapter.
 
iPad display is off. Too much hassle to change settings on the iPad for the test so I didn't bother with that. I didn't have a lot of background tasks anyway. I let charging settle for 1-2 minutes for each test since I didn't want there to be a big difference in charge states between tests.
Sounds like you tested it pretty similar way as I. I did not change settings either, I just closed all programs from background, like I actually always do when I stop using it.

It seems like mine is around 80% efficiency while yours is 85%.
It is interesting if efficiency has improved in 2018 so much, or is there some variable we missed? Even that 85% is a bit less than what I expected. Would it be possible that Air had even lower than 80% efficiency in internal charging circuit? I mean if 2017 > 2018 brought 5% then maybe.

Going by the numbers I got, charging from 0-80% on my 2017 iPad would take an estimated 3:20 at 7.9W and 2:50 at 9.2W or around 30 minutes difference.
That's what it mathematically looks like but I'm afraid that may not practically happen. I would have noticed 30 minutes difference in my tests. I did not measure by seconds but within some minutes and there was no noticeable difference to me a while back when I measured against Air + 12W charger. I'm very happy with charging speed with my 2018 + 10W charger and I don't miss 12W charger at all.
 
I would say only maybe 1 in 10, or less, 12.9 owners have the 29W charger so there must be a lot of unhappy users . . . I don’t think so!
I don’t get it? Does a lot of owners have the 29W charger? I don’t think so. Many people got this iPad instead of a Mac, I only think it’s primary tech owners and Apple lovers who get both. I only got the 29W because I have a MacBook Pro
 
I already had a MacBook with the 29W power adapter and so out of curiosity after I bought the first-generation 12.9 iPad Pro I picked up a lightning-to-USB-C cable and charged the device with it a couple of times, but I don't do it regularly. Since I've had the second-generation 12.9 iPad Pro I haven't used anything but the 12W charger that came with it, and that is perfectly satisfactory. Probably if I needed to charge it in a hurry I'd pull out the 29W adapter and the cable to charge quickly, but most of the time it is not an urgent situation.
 
I’ve purchased 11 6th Gen ipads (1 for myself and 10 for my department) and they all came with 10 watt adapters.

I just got a 128gb LTE 2018 iPad yesterday and it has a 12w charger. Do the LTE models have a bigger charger perhaps? Got mine in person at Best Buy and it must be new stock because it only became available two days ago at this store.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.