iPad + beach + umbrella ( beach type to provide a bit of shade ) = my killer summer app. Turn brightness to max and you are all set.
I have several readers (prs, kindle and kindle 2) and have not turned them on since the 3rd.
Several thousand pages later and the iPad reading experience is better every day.
Did you post this from your Kindle?
Oh wait...
Did you cook your lunch on your iPad? Oh wait...
Is this another troll post from one of the biggest Apple-haters in these forums?
Oh wait...
I think you will find the experience is not what you are expecting. Even with a shady umbrella (which was what I used today) there was a big problem with the reflectivity of the screen. I could read, but it was not a great experience.
Indoors is a completely different experience prefer the iPad to the K2. Outdoors, it takes significant effort to be able to read on the iPad. I'll experiment with brightness next time, maybe that will make a bigger difference than i expect. I hope so, I'd like it to work.
![]()
Why would anyone buy anything else?
PS: Seriously though, why did apple make the screen so reflective. People don't want to use the iPad as a mirror, they want to be able to watch stuff on it.
In hopes of avoiding another macrumors thread down the tubes (involving some of the same usernames as usual)
No, you can't post on this forum with a Kindle
No, that's not what a Kindle was designed to do
No, it isn't relevant to a discussion of how the iPad and Kindle compare specifically as e-book readers
But yes, it makes the point that the iPad is a more versatile device, in case anyone was confused about that
By the same token then one could mention that netbook might be a much better e-reader than iPad. One can read all the same stuff on netbook and it is much more versatile device than iPad (for example, one can print the book or burn it on CD or DVD).
So, yes, I think iPad versatility is mostly irrelevant in the context of e-reader discussion. It would be relevant if iPad could be used as e-reader outside. Then, indeed, hauling dedicated e-reader plus, say, netbook would be much less convenient but since everybody agrees that iPad is unusable outside the versatility becomes irrelevant. If someone wants to surf the Internet while in bed - use iPad (or HTC EVO - whatever your preference). If s/he wants to read - chose the reader that suits you most.
Have both a kindle and an iPad. I have barely picked up my kindle at all since I got the iPad. The kindle screen is so hard to look at any more. The only time I plan to use the kindle now is when I am at the beach, primarily because I don't care what happens to it if I damage it.
An iPad vs netbook as an e-reader discussion would be pretty one-sided. What would you do, press spacebar to advance a page while walking around with a clamshell device balanced on the palm of one hand? But that's not the discussion this thread has focused on, which is essentially iPad vs Kindle or other e-ink devices.
I am very confident that if someone gave me an iPad that had been modified to only run the Kindle app, I would use it a lot less than I use my Kindle 2.
The question some of us are trying to work through is whether the iPad is "good enough" that we don't need both devices. Right now, my feeling is that it isn't.
By the same token then one could mention that netbook might be a much better e-reader than iPad. One can read all the same stuff on netbook and it is much more versatile device than iPad (for example, one can print the book or burn it on CD or DVD).