Echo toxin said:
I still find it incredulous that people would buy an iMac that big. The typical user will probably get fed up with the computer about 2-3 years after ownership and a screen that size would easily last 5-6 years.
Well, I'll go for it... I've used a 20" iMac G5 for two years now, it's very comfortable, but you
can enjoy more screen-space while working on Final Cut (Express) / Dreamweaver / Garage Band / iPhoto, and other programs.
Now it is of course a personal opinion, and also a financial issue.
(Let's say my first PowerBook, when I was still a student, was a more painful decision. No iBooks then !).
Additionally, for extra space, I'd rather go for the 24" iMac than a 20" iMac with an extra 20" on my desk. Not mentioning the 7600.
About the screen, it is sad indeed that it is bundled with the machine, but you sell the whole thing together; and when the CPU is really outdated, it can be an extra-TV for as long as the screen functions properly...
As a comparison, the closest choice for a
separate Apple 23" screen is to rig it to a mini or a MacPro. The mini is too weak, and the MacPro is too expensive. (I'll end up with 3000 for an iMac 24" 2.33/2Gb/500Gb/7600, instead of 5500 for a "similar" setup with a MacPro; the MacPro is more powerful, but I don't really need that much power).
A.