I would never pay $3k for a laptop. Ever. Maybe a MP if I was making money with it, but no laptop is worth that much.
and yet many are buying the Sony Vaio Z series for more than $3k - go figure
I would never pay $3k for a laptop. Ever. Maybe a MP if I was making money with it, but no laptop is worth that much.
and yet many are buying the Sony Vaio Z series for more than $3k - go figure
Total lunacy!
Hours after my first post, and still there are 30% of the respondents that would open their wallets and pay an obscene $3k.
Don't get me wrong, I can easily afford it, but why?
Hello people, is that all you have to do with your money?
Don't look now, but Creepy Uncle Steve has a hold on you....
That's because a Vaio Z is worth $3k.
If an MBA had the specs in a $3k Vaio Z, then it would cost $6k. Doubt many people would pay that.
With the Vaio, you actually get your $3k worth.
Comparing the low-level Vaio Z (probably previous generation by now, I've done this a few months back) to the top MBA rev C you got the same spec for the same price.
Why, that they're not charging $6K for something Sony charges $3K for.And what does that say about Apple?
Personally-speaking, Cnet's news of a possibly "significantly lower"-priced MBA is a little disappointing.
I would personally certainly buy a $3000 MBA if it had, for example:
Top of the range LV/ULV Core i7 or Sandy Bridge (if available)
ATI graphics (i'd possibly even get it without discrete graphics)
Better cooling than Rev C MBA (this is important, however I'd probably settle for similar temps to current model)
256GB SSD or more
4-8GB RAM
IPS Screen
Better battery life (to whatever degree)
Glass trackpad
Integrated 3g or LTE
USB 3.0
No heavier than current model
Stunning design (I'd consider the current MBA to be stunning. This feature is a must, otherwise I'd definitely not buy)
Those would probably be the minimum specs, not exclusively, for me to fork out $3000 on an MBA. Of course I wouldn't say no to more/better specs
I those of us who are willing to pay $3000 are using that as a BTO price
8GB RAM definitely BTO from 4GB for $400
256GB SSD is a $450 upgrade
HR-AG? $150
That's $1000 right there (calculated using MBP BTO), so knowing Apple it will be $1,999
I think the thing is, in my experience, BTO options are rarely worth the money. Granted, this is a general statement, but it seems when MacWorld benchmarks BTO systems, I always come to the conclusion the speed increases are not worth the money.I those of us who are willing to pay $3000 are using that as a BTO price
8GB RAM definitely BTO from 4GB for $400
256GB SSD is a $450 upgrade
HR-AG? $150
That's $1000 right there (calculated using MBP BTO), so knowing Apple it will be $1,999
RAM can be an important upgrade, but everyone in this forum can do that themselves. I don't think paying a super premium for a SSD makes sense yet, since the tech is evolving rapidly.
To me, slight processor upgrades are the biggest "sucker" upgrade Apple has going. They are totally overpriced for the performance increase. But GPUs are the one area I'm willing to plunk down.
I guess my general point, CaoCao, is I don't feel like it generally makes sense to do a bunch of BTO options.
No wonder it's called "Apple Tax"
If the RAM is soldered on it will be worth it, HR-AG IMO is worth it too, 256GB SSD knowing Apple it could be soldered on or custom
I see. "Apple tax" is money that fans who only have more money than sense because they have no sense publicly declare they would pay for hypothetical products that Apple isn't going to build. "Microsoft tax" on the other hand is what real people with no intent of owning Microsoft products were forced to pay because Microsoft blackmailed all the PC makers into contracts where you had to pay for Windows on a computer even if you didn't want it.
Since the courts decided that the Microsoft tax is illegal, Microsoft had to invent the "Apple tax".
I want a computer that doesn't self destruct after the warranty ends, my cousin says Macs are long lived (he still uses his PowerBook G3 Pismo occasionally )
PS HR-AG is High Resolution-Anti Glare
Actually, you're dead wrong. Apple has reduced the prices of Macs, but it still charges $3000 for Mac notebooks all the time. With BTO options, the MBPs can hit $3000.
When the original MBA was introduced with SSD, it was priced at $3099. If Apple introduces a 256 GB SSD, it will need to raise the prices from current to offset... if it has 8 GB RAM BTO option, that will add money, and it can easily get to $3k.
The ultraportable market has Vaio Zs at over $3k, and other ultraportables approaching that price tag too.
I don't think $3k is out of line, especially if we add in BTO options for the MBA again.
For $3000 it would need to have impossible specs.
Hexcore i7
8gb ram, upgradable to 16gb
dual 512gb ssd's (6Gb/s) with hardware raid 0
blu ray
4g
light peak ports
dual mini-dp ports (that can drive a 30")
and a 24hour battery with built in solar charging or inductive charging
and weigh less than 2Lbs
Like I said, Impossible and I still wouldn't pay it.
And why not add openCL female comment de-mystifier algorithm? I'd pay 5k for that with astonishing velocity. Or how about a depression-sensor-tripped nostalgia mode activator which senses your tears on the trackpad in the absence of any normally upsetting screen content and pumps out mp3s of snes games and parental vocal-wavelength reassurance at the same time as beaming onto all walls of your room projections of the inner lining of the uterus forcing you into regression and reprogramming?How about dual hexacore i7s, 12GB RAM standard (upgradable to 192GB), 6 displayports for eyefinity, -1" thick, and -3lbs? It'll be a Mac Pro to go and won't weigh a ton
Time machine+accident/theft insurance (State Farm does a year for $60!)Never pay. I just had my $1400 laptop stolen. A $3000 MBA would be even more devastating, and an even bigger thief magnet.
Even desktops can't match that you know that right?For $3000 it would need to have impossible specs.
Hexcore i7
8gb ram, upgradable to 16gb
dual 512gb ssd's (6Gb/s) with hardware raid 0
blu ray
4g
light peak ports
dual mini-dp ports (that can drive a 30")
and a 24hour battery with built in solar charging or inductive charging
and weigh less than 2Lbs
Like I said, Impossible and I still wouldn't pay it.