Ok, I was just reading the review for the Blackberry World Edition. This is a perfect example of a phone that 'almost' does it all.
It also has 3G. Looking at the size of this thing it is very comparable to the size of the iPhone. Can we just get past the myth that Apple has been giving us about the 'size' of the 3G chip and not being able to squeeze it into iPhone V1???
It's not a "myth," and you're comparing apples to oranges.
If you do your homework on Blackberry devices, you'll notice two things:
1. The 8830 "World" Edition actually doesn't support 3G on GSM networks. It doesn't even support any flavor of GSM in the US for that matter.
2. To date, Blackberry hasn't developed a 3G GSM/HSPA handset. At all.
Now, why do you think that is?
This is because the CDMA networks where 3G is support by the 8830 are a different animal from the GSM derivatives. And incorporating them would take up... you guessed it: too much power, and too much space. And while yes, it SEEMS like the CDMA people get all the fun, there are plenty of disadvantages to CDMA, including the fact that it can, in real-world situations, be somewhat slower than GSM' 3G HSPA. I know, I used CDMA for 7 years, then jumped even before the iPhone dropped.
Bottom line: Apple wanted a world phone, and they weren't going to get it if it was CDMA-only. they had to choose, and *I* think they chose wisely.
Even if all things where equal, the 8830 lacks
- A touch screen,
- 4/8GB of memory,
- WiFi, which depending on what it's connected to can be way faster than 3G or even projected 4G in many cases,
- And the processing power involved in supporting a full web browser, e-mail support without the need to tether to a vast proxy and server farm that RIM maintains on the network side concealed from users' view (but charges an arm and a leg extra for), and all the other nice things we get on the iPhone.
Do you think the touch screen, WiFi and extra memory alone take up zero space and require no processor power? It all takes up room and resources. In reality, the iPhone simply has to do more than a Blackberry does.
Lastly, while I can agree that too many people are charging for WiFi access, I should point that many people can obtain WiFi for no extra charge in the two spots that count the most: at home and at work. if they travel, many hotels offer it for free too. EDGE is a good compromise in those palces where you need something quick but can't obtain WiFi, or would rather not pay for it.