iPhone 14 Pro Max If no more real cpu and camera upgrades in 15/16/17 pro series…Are you going to buy?

[NotApplicable]

Yes I will, because there is much more to a phone than CPU/camera!

- display
- cell modem
- Wi-Fi standard
- battery
- charging port
- chassis material
- new features

Etc.

That being said, 13P to 14P was a perfectly substantial CPU upgrade according to benchmarks…

 

[NikkoTuason]

I’ll be upgrading every two years if that’s the case.

 

[AppleB]

No. They showed A13 being faster than competitions chips from this year. The key point was not comparing A15 and A16. That was just your made up fantasy in your head.

That’s how I see the comparison. According to Apple A13 if faster than what the competitors offer in 2022.

I really don’t care how much faster a A16 is over a A15. The OP must have a lot of time on his hands to constantly trying to check ’s claims.

 

[The Game 161]

5-6X optical zoom will require the periscope technology to be used as the camera hump would never accommodate a telephoto at this magnification. I think it is all coming, just a few years down the road.

Until then, I plan on greatly enjoying what I have now!

correct, pericope lens is said to be coming to the bigger model. rumours are to be called 15 ultra and the regular pro gets it a year later

 

[BR313]

Yes simply because I’m a tech nerd who enjoys having the “latest and greatest”.

 

[fatTribble]

Ho yeah but the key point is A15 and A16 performances are so closed that they don't want to show in key note.

Oh I understand you now. Apple took the fastest processor in any smartphone and made it even faster…in a single year. The competition can’t even keep up with Apple’s processor from 3 years ago. Yet, it’s just not fast enough for you. How will Apple ever survive?!

Apologies if I got sarcasm on anyone.

 

[fatTribble]

Based of the broken English and hate towards Apple with no evidence it’s pretty clear it’s a Huawei plant.

I mean all credibility is lost by saying A16 (4nm chip) is the same as A15 (5nm chip).

I can’t imagine working for a company that chose deceptive practices because they can’t compete. I think I’d find another job.

 

[fatTribble]

Yes simply because I’m a tech nerd who enjoys having the “latest and greatest”.

You’re among friends.

“Bring our friend a hard-boiled egg and some prune juice.”―Prune Juice Nerd (The Simpsons)

 

[babyexercise]

No. They showed A13 being faster than competitions chips from this year. The key point was not comparing A15 and A16. That was just your made up fantasy in your head.

A16 Bionic Performs 5 Percent Slower Than A15 Bionic in Multi-Core Run​

A16 Bionic Performs 5 Percent Slower Than A15 Bionic in Multi-Core Run, but Is the Fastest Mobile SoC in Single-Core Tests

The initial A16 Bionic benchmark leak shows that Apple’s latest SoC is slightly slower than the A15 Bionic, but the results may improve

wccftech.com

What does your "No" mean? You refuse to accept a fact?

 

[I7guy]

A16 Bionic Performs 5 Percent Slower Than A15 Bionic in Multi-Core Run​

A16 Bionic Performs 5 Percent Slower Than A15 Bionic in Multi-Core Run, but Is the Fastest Mobile SoC in Single-Core Tests

The initial A16 Bionic benchmark leak shows that Apple’s latest SoC is slightly slower than the A15 Bionic, but the results may improve

wccftech.com

What does your "No" mean? You refuse to accept a fact?

Fact? Facts are malleable.

A16 Bionic vs A15 Bionic: tests and benchmarks

We put Apple A16 Bionic against A15 Bionic to find out which SoC is better. See performance comparison in benchmarks and games.

nanoreview.net

At any rate, even if the two are within a statistical margin of error, I'll take the better neural engine, better battery life, higher nit screen, LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, 2x3.46 GHz Everest + 4x2.02 GHz Sawtooth, 48 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift O, 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, better selfie, bluetooth 5.3 dual band a-gps, emergency comm satellite and others.

 

[babyexercise]

Fact? Facts are malleable.

A16 Bionic vs A15 Bionic: tests and benchmarks

We put Apple A16 Bionic against A15 Bionic to find out which SoC is better. See performance comparison in benchmarks and games.

nanoreview.net

Your link gives score 99 to both chips in the first overall scoring, lol xd

 

[I7guy]

Your link gives score 99 to both chips in the first overall scoring, lol xd

Exactly. Facts are malleable. It's a fact my website have these performance numbers and a fact your website has those performance numbers. Prove who is correct. lol

 

[Jackbequickly]

correct, pericope lens is said to be coming to the bigger model. rumours are to be called 15 ultra and the regular pro gets it a year later

‘A periscope device will take some room inside the phone for sure.

 

[babyexercise]

Exactly. Facts are malleable. It's a fact my website have these performance numbers and a fact your website has those performance numbers. Prove who is correct. lol

Scores agree with my conclusion: "the key point is A15 and A16 performances are so closed that they don't want to show in key note."

 

[adamgbiggs]

A16 Bionic vs A15 Bionic: tests and benchmarks

We put Apple A16 Bionic against A15 Bionic to find out which SoC is better. See performance comparison in benchmarks and games.

nanoreview.net

So other than the first score being the same (99) the 16 beats the 15 in every other way, so you telling us the 15 is same as 16?

 

[I7guy]

Scores agree with my conclusion: "the key point is A15 and A16 performances are so closed that they don't want to show in key note."

No, be intellectually honest and call it your opinion because you have no way of knowing Apples' thinking on the keynote.

 

[Sweatypalms557]

A16 Bionic Performs 5 Percent Slower Than A15 Bionic in Multi-Core Run​

A16 Bionic Performs 5 Percent Slower Than A15 Bionic in Multi-Core Run, but Is the Fastest Mobile SoC in Single-Core Tests

The initial A16 Bionic benchmark leak shows that Apple’s latest SoC is slightly slower than the A15 Bionic, but the results may improve

wccftech.com

What does your "No" mean? You refuse to accept a fact?

Did you really link a benchmark test done before the iPhone 14 Pro was even announced? Those benchmarks done before announcement are unreliable and not even confirmed to be real. Please do better.