chortytke said:In response to all the comments yeah im going to wait for the release of the Intel desktops MAC, and multmedia purposes is like for Graphics with After Effects, Final Cut, and so on for many years!
chortytke said:In response to all the comments yeah im going to wait for the release of the Intel desktops MAC, and multmedia purposes is like for Graphics with After Effects, Final Cut, and so on for many years!... but to say that XPS is slower than a MAc Mini is stupid and to say that top-aline XPS (with Intel Duo2 core) and new Mac processing powers don't match up they do but i would still give it to the macs to be a little faster, and platforms really only matters on how easy apps work together such as the ones Macs offer and which most designers dont use, but when your not stupid and been working with the same programs for years you can essentially create any images (video or Images) on any computer its just that Macs are prefered for designers, we are. So what really only matters (with minor exeptions) is the processing powers, because RAM is RAM (we are comparitively talking here) graphics card, hard, monitor. So who ever thinks just because Dell names it a "gaming sytem" does not mean the the new Intel Duo 2 Core processors,are almost comparitively or just as fast as the Intel MACS! with student discount a 2GB RAM, 3.6GH Intel 2 coe Duo, a 512MB Graphics card 24" monitor at $3200, cant do and keep up the NEW Intel Mac desktop, which with these upgrades will be about $4,500 or more is STUPID!! dont get me wrong i LOVE MAcs but is the extra $1000+ worth the money maybe so will soon find out???????????????
chortytke said:I wasnt talking about laptops and although they are good but not for processng power!, but the NEW INTEL desktops that aren't out yet and yes they will be that expensive Guaranteed!!! and those are mainly for SERVERS for multiple computers!!!!!!!!!
kevin.rivers said:I am tired of people buying computers with the idea that they may get into something like video editing, etc. Because in my experience 75% don't ever do it, and they just spent thousands of dollars.
risc said:I work with server and workstation hardware and the XPS is not workstation class it is definitely a gaming PC. The Mac pro desktop will be heaps faster than it for graphics work (like any real workstation). You've made the fatal mistake of thinking a Conroe will compare with the Woodcrest. One is the Pentium IV replacement the other is the Xeon replacement, the Woodcrest is SMP enabled the Conroe in the XPS is not. Right there you have 2 more cores to play with. There is a lot more that makes a workstation a workstation and not a PC, but I can't be bothered getting in to it. As mentioned above numbers don't mean squat if you have no idea what they mean.
IMHO people have been very helpful but you're coming back attacking everything we say. You have no interest in buying a Mac so don't do it, get yourself a PC. Just don't compare the XPS to the yet to be released Mac Pro, or any other workstation class machine because they aren't in the same class. If you want suggestions for good graphics workstations you've got 2 here already I mentioned the HP XW9300 above, and kevin.rivers mentioned the Dell Precision both will work heaps better than the XPS.
edit: too many typos
Kentsfield will be out before Cloverton I have a feeling, and it should be pretty darn soon. I've got a few people on my forum testing Kentsfield's right now and they are a sweet piece of pwnage to say the least. I'd be more than happy to see one end up in a Mac Prorisc said:The Intel Woodcrest is dual core, you are thinking of the Cloverton which isn't scheduled to be released for months.
dpaanlka said:With all these corrections going on, I also want to clarify to the original poster that it's Mac, not MAC.
"Mac" is short for Macintosh, it is not an abbreviation for anything, unless you're talking about Multiplexed Analogue Components, but that wouldn't make any sense in the context of this thread, now would it? So, there is no need to capitalize the A or the C, especially if you want to sound like you know what you're talking about.
kevin.rivers said:I will stop now.![]()
blackout8 said:Heh honestly... I know its annoying and always seems ignorant but-
It's actually hilarious to see the storm that follows any post with MAC. Its not really that important is it![]()
dpaanlka said:I personally believe it is important to at least get proper names right. I find it hard to take people seriously if they can't spell Bmw, MAC, or I-pod correctly. Especially when they're trying to sound serious. I'm not doing cartwheels of rage over here, just making a correction for future reference.
This also goes for people saying "Mac Oh Es Ex" in person.
bobber205 said:How do you reference to OS X in person?![]()
dpaanlka said:I personally believe it is important to at least get proper names right. I find it hard to take people seriously if they can't spell Bmw, MAC, or I-pod correctly. Especially when they're trying to sound serious. I'm not doing cartwheels of rage over here, just making a correction for future reference.
This also goes for people saying "Mac Oh Es Ex" in person.
It does. Don't worry too much.dpaanlka said:I hope that smilie means your joking...
bobber205 said:It does. Don't worry too much.![]()