i have the same model, i upgraded the RAM to 4GB months later but now i'm thinking to max it out to 8 GB, do you recommend that? or should i wait for when Minis come with SSDs as standard?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iMac or Mini?
- Thread starter mstruve
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
i have the same model, i upgraded the RAM to 4GB months later but now i'm thinking to max it out to 8 GB, do you recommend that? or should i wait for when Minis come with SSDs as standard?
i can wait for a year for this:
512 GB SSD
8 GB Memory
$799
but i doubt we will get this next year, i think it's gonna take a while...2014 maybe.
SSD prices will go down, but do you seriously expect a 512 GB SSD in 18 months to cost less than 100 bucks? (Considering your quote)
Seriously, I'm watching computer part prices for years now, and this wouldn't make sense from a marketing standpoint. Nobody cares if they could offer SSDs for such a price by then, they simply won't.
Oh I'm just talking the Mac Mini in general because I'm an ass.
But I do think SSD prices will drop pretty quickly as more and more OEM's start adopting them, maybe not that much. But I think we'll start to see them nose dive this year, or early next year.
Oh I miss the day when if you wanted a fast hard drive, a Raptor was your only option
well before the hdd flood it was possible to buy a new 3tb western digital hdd with a good 3 yr warranty from a few trusted ebay sellers for 99 bucks. Also 3tb hdds could be found at about 119 on amazon and slash or newegg on a 1 day promo.
I purchased a crucial 512gb ssd4 fo 329 from buy.com this year. 16gb of mac mini ram was 1300 about a year ago today if you are lucky you can get 16gb of mac mini ram for 85 dollars on a one day sale at newegg. so getting a 512gb ssd will get a lot lower. but how low? i do not know
I'd say go for the iMac. The 2GB RAM on the Mac Mini is so tiny, you'd have to upgrade it right away.
Also, a decent monitor with the quality of the iMac display would be very expensive, around $300 at least.
And then the iMac has the quad-core processor, which so far I've never had it run out of power. It just soars through everything I throw at it.
Finally, the integrated graphics means that you won't be able to as much on it as an iMac, and considering those points, the iMac is definitely the better buy.
The iMac also has a Superdrive if you want to burn a DVD for backing up photos or if you want to watch a movie off a DVD or even rip some music off of a CD.
Also, a decent monitor with the quality of the iMac display would be very expensive, around $300 at least.
And then the iMac has the quad-core processor, which so far I've never had it run out of power. It just soars through everything I throw at it.
Finally, the integrated graphics means that you won't be able to as much on it as an iMac, and considering those points, the iMac is definitely the better buy.
The iMac also has a Superdrive if you want to burn a DVD for backing up photos or if you want to watch a movie off a DVD or even rip some music off of a CD.
The machine will not struggle for your needs. I have a macbook pro with similar components and it's really fast. The bottleneck is just the HDD so I hope to upgrade to SSD eventually, but that only affects boot time, program loading, and a little bit of responsiveness. But once things are open it's super fast.