Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Ok, just got my iMac Pro (10 core, 64GB Ram, Vega 64) and thought the point I'm making below could do with a new thread.

Although I had justified the cost with all the Final Cut Pro X I'll be doing, I'll be honest and admit I wasn't 100% sure how well Illustrator, Photoshop and InDesign would run and they are my main income source. So before doing anything else, I had to do some 'unscientific' testing but tests that would mean something to the way I work.

I currently use a full spec 15" 2016 MBP with a LG 5K and a 2013 i7 iMac. There are some files that I have really struggled with - some illustrations with many complex paths, shadings and meshes. They would take a while to load up properly, especially when changing zoom levels - not anymore - wow!

But the killer for me is an InDesign file of an exhibition I did that includes many of those Illustrator files, along with photographs and text. I have a spread that is 8 pages wide (each page is 10005mm x 1960 mm) that I always worked in 'typical display' with as it was impossible to view in high quality display - it would even take about a minute to change view options with scrolling impossible and I'd need to make a PDF to view at a decent resolution. This iMac Pro acts like it is scrolling though my address book, it is that smooth!! I'm completely taken aback by how amazing it is.

Still got to dive into Photoshop but I went for the most challenging files first. I really didn't expect performance of this magnitude so I'm obviously delighted!

I have to say, don't listen to the naysayers who go on about how this machine is overkill for graphic design. It might be for a lot of files/use cases but I've now got the ability to do work that I simply couldn't do in an optimal way before and will save a lot of time. I tried to trip the machine up with extreme files and it passed with flying colours. I'll no longer be dreading editing some files and that is worth a lot too!

There's been so much negativity on this forum about cost etc, if you can justify in time-savings, tax or whatever - you'll know yourself. Well done Apple, not been so excited about the possibilities of a new Mac ever really :)

Interesting post as I have simlar illustrator files that take a long time to open and work with on my 2010 Mac Pro. Your spec is more than I want to spend, would the upgraded graphics card make a dirffence with CC apps ? Was thinking 8core 64gb if I do go ahead with a Pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigerbait1953
Thanks for the link Bryan. One more satisfied user!
Was interesting to see his machine's Geekbench scores. He had a late 2013 iMac which is newer than my late 2012 iMac so I had to quickly run Geekbench on my machine as well. Just to see how much more I would benefit.
Looks like I'm going to see even more dramatic improvements than Bailey!
Can't wait!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tigerbait1953
Of note for us photographer types, Martin Bailey just published a great review:

https://www.martinbaileyphotography.com/2017/12/28/mid-spec-imac-pro-review-wow-podcast-601/
Thanks for sharing - was also interesting as I also use a Drobo, Sans Disk Extreme 900 and LG 5K so was very relevant to me. Was surprised and pleased that graphic performance doesn't take a big hit with the extra screen.

I decided to stick with the 1TB internal SSD as those Extreme 900's are great little disks and I can buy more. And I'm going to keep my big iTunes library on the MBP to make room on the 'powerhouse'. One thing that is rarely mentioned is the 4 USB-C ports, over time more and more 'upgradability' can come via those.
[doublepost=1514547244][/doublepost]
Interesting post as I have simlar illustrator files that take a long time to open and work with on my 2010 Mac Pro. Your spec is more than I want to spend, would the upgraded graphics card make a dirffence with CC apps ? Was thinking 8core 64gb if I do go ahead with a Pro.
I always go for the top card as nearly everything I do is related to graphics/photography/video. The general consensus is it will be better. I've always wanted to take some projects into an Apple store and try them out on different configurations to see what I actually need - but I guess that will never happen!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryan Bowler
Of note for us photographer types, Martin Bailey just published a great review:

https://www.martinbaileyphotography.com/2017/12/28/mid-spec-imac-pro-review-wow-podcast-601/
liked this review, I have a 2013 iMac but using the i5 with 780M video.

while I doubt seriously I will upgrade to the Pro; I really don't do work that benefits from its premise; I am really waiting to see if there is a new chassis for the next iMac. Perhaps by new chassis they will use the iMac Pro setup so that cooling is much better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bryan Bowler
Can't see any debate if a painter and decorator spends a few thousand more on a van with better fuel economy or just because it might last him another year - he just gets what he wants and puts it against his tax bill - same deal.[/QUOTE said:
I love this analogy. so true. haha. So really it all depends on if your the kinda person that has alloy wheels on your van or not!
If you can offset this on your daily use of Final cut editing long form 4K every time then your defo bang on. I just wouldn't want pure adobe users to delude themselves that its necessary as I believe it is not at this time.

Your comparing a 2016 mbp with an imac pro, of course its loads faster. Id suspect that all your tests had they been done on a fully loaded imac 4.5ghz would also come out the same. The real test will be some folk with the latest imac top spec vs a like minded imacpro running adobe.

this link is handy if anyone is in 2 minds about performance for adobe use. (atleast AE & simgle thread task performance )
https://www.pugetsystems.com/recomm...After-Effects-CC-144/Hardware-Recommendations

I really thought id be buying the pro but after lots of research
I ordered today a standard imac top spec 1TB ram for £2800. 64gb of crucial ram for £700. = £3500. The imac pro 8 core came in a £6500!

It all horses for courses but thats my take on it. Hope someone finds it useful to read.
 
I look forward to hearing how you have tested it with Logic Pro X. Do you use it with sample libraries and such? Kontakt, etc.

I will often have 25 Kontakt instances going with a few plugins at the end, while watching an HD video that I’m scoring to. Some of my sample libraries are HUGE, which i know can be taxing on the system. If anyone is using their iMac pro like this, I would love to hear about it.
 
Of note for us photographer types, Martin Bailey just published a great review:

https://www.martinbaileyphotography.com/2017/12/28/mid-spec-imac-pro-review-wow-podcast-601/

Dammit, I just said yes to the Vega 56 10-core, 64Gb, 1Tb SSD as a stopgap until the new Mac Pro, though our workflow is quite different to his (Dropbox for Lightroom/Capture One catalog and Client Images sync, raws on external HDDs backed up regularly to NAS) I’m curious if I should have gone for Vega 64 - but I’m also in the same boat regarding my confidence in Adobe pulling their finger out in regards to multi-core optimisation.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.