OK,
NOTE: I know they are different focal lengths so no flaming for the schoolboy error the point I am making here is the Summilux doesnt gather less light and it is WAY better image quality as you would expect. Also the aperture doesnt read accurately on the Ms with the Nokton.
To help someone avoid wasting their time on a cheap lens. I bought a Nokton 50mm f1.1 for use on Leica M9 and MM cameras. I was hoping it would be good enough for use in low low light, just giving me that little edge that making it possible to use the cameras in super low light more easily.
The lens arrived and to say the least I was disappointed. It was too soft, too hard to focus not because of the thin DoF, but because of the horrific back focus. It is built like a tank and feels lovely. Finder blockage on the rangefinder is funny, I thought it isnt too bad until I took a portrait oriented image then realised that my focus hand was right in front of the viewfinder because of the diameter of the lens barrel. However, as I own 50 and 35 Summilux lenses, then I accept I am maybe spoiled with wide open performance.
So, this is not a scientific test by any stretch, obviously they have different focal lengths (because I forgot to pop the 50 on the MM before heading out. I took these images on two consecutive evenings at roughly the same time. I dont know, maybe someone will find value in this, maybe not but holy crap! the Summiluxes earned their keep in my mind.
I will say though that the Nokton has a helluva nice colour profile... I think if I hadnt had the joy of the Summiluxes beforehand, I would have been happier.
Anyway, for brain food, enjoy the pictures.
1. Church door, focussed on the door handles.
First up, Nokton 50mm @f1.1
L1002890.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
2. Light, focused on the cross bar of the light
Next Summilux 35 @f1.4
L1002901.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
Nokton 50mm @f1.1
L1002891.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
Summilux 35mm @f1.4
L1002902.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
3. Cabinets, focused on the top right corner of the first cabinet
Nokton 50mm @f1.1
L1002883.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
Summilux 35mm @f1.4
L1002897.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
NOTE: I know they are different focal lengths so no flaming for the schoolboy error the point I am making here is the Summilux doesnt gather less light and it is WAY better image quality as you would expect. Also the aperture doesnt read accurately on the Ms with the Nokton.
To help someone avoid wasting their time on a cheap lens. I bought a Nokton 50mm f1.1 for use on Leica M9 and MM cameras. I was hoping it would be good enough for use in low low light, just giving me that little edge that making it possible to use the cameras in super low light more easily.
The lens arrived and to say the least I was disappointed. It was too soft, too hard to focus not because of the thin DoF, but because of the horrific back focus. It is built like a tank and feels lovely. Finder blockage on the rangefinder is funny, I thought it isnt too bad until I took a portrait oriented image then realised that my focus hand was right in front of the viewfinder because of the diameter of the lens barrel. However, as I own 50 and 35 Summilux lenses, then I accept I am maybe spoiled with wide open performance.
So, this is not a scientific test by any stretch, obviously they have different focal lengths (because I forgot to pop the 50 on the MM before heading out. I took these images on two consecutive evenings at roughly the same time. I dont know, maybe someone will find value in this, maybe not but holy crap! the Summiluxes earned their keep in my mind.
I will say though that the Nokton has a helluva nice colour profile... I think if I hadnt had the joy of the Summiluxes beforehand, I would have been happier.
Anyway, for brain food, enjoy the pictures.
1. Church door, focussed on the door handles.
First up, Nokton 50mm @f1.1
L1002890.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
2. Light, focused on the cross bar of the light
Next Summilux 35 @f1.4
L1002901.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
Nokton 50mm @f1.1
L1002891.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
Summilux 35mm @f1.4
L1002902.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
3. Cabinets, focused on the top right corner of the first cabinet
Nokton 50mm @f1.1
L1002883.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
Summilux 35mm @f1.4
L1002897.jpg by Ken OHagan, on Flickr
Last edited: