The iPhone 5 or Lumia 920??
920
Just too "blocky" but to each his own if they like it....just have a hard time seeing what is so great about it
The iPhone 5 or Lumia 920??
920
Just too "blocky" but to each his own if they like it....just have a hard time seeing what is so great about it
920
Just too "blocky" but to each his own if they like it....just have a hard time seeing what is so great about it
The Nokia Lumia 920 is 10.7mm thick which is way too thick. Nokia calls this their flagship, high-end smartphone. Yet it's over 1 mm thicker than the iPhone 4/4S which is 2 year old design. Not to mention the glossy coating (yuck) and colors (yellow, red). While I like the WP8 UI and I really like Nokia's engineering, they need to slim down a little. Also, their camera tech is about the only thing that's significantly improved versus their older Lumia devices. Yes, the CPU/GPU is better but that's not really that exciting. I'm going to pass on this, the horrid color choices and glossy coating are the big turn-offs.
i think this phone looks and feels like crap
Let me ask you this, do you put a case on your iPhone? If yes, then what are you complaining about size wise? If not, as said before this phone is thinner than the original iPhone. A phone that almost everybody agreed on at the time, was very solid and comfortable to hold/carry.
People need to get over their infatuation with thinness in phones, and quit nitpicking. There was actually an article about how many people are complaining that the iP5 is too thin.
Color wise, to each their own. But if a color spectrum from red, yellow, gray, white, and black doesn't suit your eye; then I'm not entirely sure what you're looking for. Not to mention the black and gray are rumored to be matte. As well as a tease in a Nokia video that Cyan might be available too.
Wow it a whole mm thicker? How will we ever hold it?
BTW, that is just a smidge thinner than the first Gen iPhone and over a mm thinner than the iP3 & 3GS. Those two were 12.3 mm thick.
Did you own either of those?
I dont get the infactuation with thinness.
Everyone in here always said the iPhone felt solid because of its weight, well now it is very light and some reviewers say it feels cheap but im sure everyone in here will say it feels solid as a rock.
However, the risk is so high and if Microsoft doesn't get out of their 2-3% market share with W8P, it's pretty much the end for Nokia.
And comparing to the first iPhone is a pretty weak argument. I mean, any phone in the last 10 years was thinner than those very first brick-shaped cellphones but that doesn't mean anything.
Whether I put a case or not on my phone is completely irrelevant to the engineering team at Nokia. The key in your argument is "at the time". Things change over time. I don't put a case on my iPhone 4 (waiting on my iPhone 5 to be delivered). And comparing to the first iPhone is a pretty weak argument. I mean, any phone in the last 10 years was thinner than those very first brick-shaped cellphones but that doesn't mean anything.
When did you feel one? It isnt out yet.
It's millimeters people. Let's not pass up a phone that can be genuinely special and shake up the market because it's a few millimeters thicker than the iP5. You won't notice after awhile, or even care for that matter. I promise.
the iPhone has had retina-class displays for 3 iterations.
All better phones have that now, right?
Comparing the Lumia 920 to the first iPhone is pretty weak. It's over 5 years old. The very first cellphones were brick sized. It doesn't mean anything.
The iPhone feels solid not because of weight alone but because of the materials used. Metal is solid. Plastic is not. Glass looks very classy. Also, the frame felt very solid. Some Android phones are made of cheap flexible plastic that doesn't feel too solid. Yes, the iPhone is light but weight alone is not why I (keyword: I) think the 4/4S felt solid.
Hmm it was a nokia and could have sworn it was out on display at the ATT. Very easily may have been mistaken but looked similar to what is posted here
Maybe I was holding the old model
So? I doubt it will shake up the market. Apart from the camera tech, there is nothing that is really special or unique to it. Faster CPU/GPU? Every new smartphone has that. Design? Same as previous. Screen? It's a huge improvement no doubt but the iPhone has had retina-class displays for 3 iterations.
In a few aspects, it's actually a step backward. Like the glossy finish. Thickness.
Basically everything you said can be applied to the iPhone 5 as well. In the end it all depends how good Windows 8 is. Apple's iOS, though it works well, is starting to feel severely dated. I'm also pretty sure the screen on the Lumia will be superior to the iPhone.
Yea now. We didn't see phones have retina-class displays until after 4S.
True and the Lumia screen is superior on paper. Not sure about real life.
Can't see why that plays any role whatsoever for buying a phone today.
----------
I only had a Lumia 800 for testing. Compare to the iPhone 4 I didn't notice any difference. Could be that the Lumia is a bit brighter in daylight. iPhone 5 has pretty much the same screen.
It plays a role because the rest of the industry was playing catchup to the iPhone 4. Lumia 800 and 920 have different PPIs and panel technologies. Nokia now uses IPS instead of the disgusting AMOLED.
Screen looks good, so who cares about the technology or who had it first?
If first is important, then go for Motorola, they had already mobile phones out when Apple started in 1980 or so.
The Nokia Lumia 920 is 10.7mm thick which is way too thick. Nokia calls this their flagship, high-end smartphone. Yet it's over 1 mm thicker than the iPhone 4/4S which is 2 year old design. Not to mention the glossy coating (yuck) and colors (yellow, red). While I like the WP8 UI and I really like Nokia's engineering, they need to slim down a little. Also, their camera tech is about the only thing that's significantly improved versus their older Lumia devices. Yes, the CPU/GPU is better but that's not really that exciting. I'm going to pass on this, the horrid color choices and glossy coating are the big turn-offs.
You realize Apple didn't engineer the screen, right? They just sourced a part before their competitors because of the industry pull they have.IPS is vastly superior to AMOLED. And solely being first doesn't mean much. But having a retina-class display about 2 years after Apple already put one on the market isn't going to shake up the market. It's not special or unique anymore.
On the other hand, it is still 73C on your app icon. Enjoy the 5th row by the way.