Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

UBS28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Oct 2, 2012
2,893
2,340
How the hell are Intel MAC's better at running ARM mobile apps than the M1 / M1 Pro / M1 Max machines.

And I don't buy Apple their statement that it is up to the developers because with an Intel MAC, you can pretty much run every ARM mobile app out there on Android.
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,521
19,678
Ah, that old violin. I honestly don't get why anyone would care. Regardless, Apple's decision to give the app developers control over this stuff makes perfect sense to me, it's about trust and quality of user experience. As a dev, I would probably be seriously upset if my publisher suddenly decided to run my apps on platforms I never intended to support.
 

Aggedor

macrumors 6502a
Dec 10, 2020
799
939
These threads are so weird. Apple Silicon is so far ahead of x86 (good for computing in general, good for Apple in particular), and yet there's still a slice of Apple users who are determined to try and find ways to undermine that progress. Intel Macs running Android apps is so niche it's not even a thing to consider.
 

UBS28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Oct 2, 2012
2,893
2,340
These threads are so weird. Apple Silicon is so far ahead of x86 (good for computing in general, good for Apple in particular), and yet there's still a slice of Apple users who are determined to try and find ways to undermine that progress. Intel Macs running Android apps is so niche it's not even a thing to consider.

And why not? People who own a M1 / M1 Pro / M1 Max probably also have iOS devices like a 12.9 M1 iPad Pro.

With my previous machines, if I was too lazy to grab my 12.9 M1 iPad Pro, I could simply access the same app from my Intel MAC by launching the Android version.

I cannot do that on my 16" M1 Max MBP.
 

Rashy

Suspended
Jan 7, 2020
186
372
These threads are so weird. Apple Silicon is so far ahead of x86 (good for computing in general, good for Apple in particular), and yet there's still a slice of Apple users who are determined to try and find ways to undermine that progress. Intel Macs running Android apps is so niche it's not even a thing to consider.
Fully agreed, plus those vague, clickbaity titles (like here) make it even worse.
 

UBS28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Oct 2, 2012
2,893
2,340
Why not? Does that Android app has weird 32-bit dependency to prevent you run it from an Android emulator?

The tools I used are not supported for M1 (yet). Maybe in the future it will.

Apple was promoting us with the ability to run iOS apps on M1 machines. But it is very lackluster and certaintly not an improvement over what we had on Intel Mac's with Android apps.
 

Gnattu

macrumors 65816
Sep 18, 2020
1,107
1,671
Apple was promoting us with the ability to run iOS apps on M1 machines. But it is very lackluster and certaintly not an improvement over what we had on Intel Mac's with Android apps.
This is ultimately the developer's decision to not let you run a specific app on a Mac, and Apple is enforcing that decision to make sure macOS does not behave like a "jail-broken iOS". This makes sense for Apple and the developers, but the end result is losing (the majority of) apps the end users can run. The ability is there, and Intel Macs cannot do this.
 

Gnattu

macrumors 65816
Sep 18, 2020
1,107
1,671
The tools I used are not supported for M1 (yet). Maybe in the future it will.
I'm using the one comes with Android Studio. It is native and does arm64 virtualization directly(no arm to x86 emulation like we used to have on Intel Macs), therefore the performance of it is pretty well. Apps will run properly if it does not have 32-bit dependencies(otherwise it will crash due to no 32-bit execution state support in M1). The problem is that Android Studio is such a bloatware if the only useful function to you is the emulator, but it is the only one that works WELL afaik.
 

UBS28

macrumors 68030
Original poster
Oct 2, 2012
2,893
2,340
I'm using the one comes with Android Studio. It is native and does arm64 virtualization directly(no arm to x86 emulation like we used to have on Intel Macs), therefore the performance of it is pretty well. Apps will run properly if it does not have 32-bit dependencies(otherwise it will crash due to no 32-bit execution state support in M1). The problem is that Android Studio is such a bloatware if the only useful function to you is the emulator, but it is the only one that works WELL afaik.

Many thanks. I will try this one out and see if it works.
 

Aggedor

macrumors 6502a
Dec 10, 2020
799
939
And why not? People who own a M1 / M1 Pro / M1 Max probably also have iOS devices like a 12.9 M1 iPad Pro.

With my previous machines, if I was too lazy to grab my 12.9 M1 iPad Pro, I could simply access the same app from my Intel MAC by launching the Android version.

I cannot do that on my 16" M1 Max MBP.
I don't understand what you are saying. I can run iOS apps on my M1 MBA.
 

MajorFubar

macrumors 68020
Oct 27, 2021
2,174
3,826
Lancashire UK
Got to be honest, I find mobile apps to be so restrictive compared to their desktop equivalents, using one on my computer is probably the last thing I'd want to do. But i guess we all have different needs and expectations.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.