As far as modern-compatible browsers go, yes. There have been a few new drops in lighter less-modern browsers, but IWPPC is still the one for the best shot at the modern web.First, has anything new happened on the PPC browser scene? Is InterWebPPC RR4 still the latest and greatest?
Likely a side effect of RR4 being a single release, rather than one for each CPU type; for maximum compatibility, Quartz wasn't enabled (unless it is and it's just not presented as such).why does InterWebPPC RR3 have a "dedicated Quartz" version, while RR4 doesn't?
e~
Okay, so this was on my mind quite a bit after I made this post, so I went and actually tested this, in Speedometer 2.1-- probably not the best test for this but it was the one I came up with off the top of my head. I put RR4 head-to-head against RR3 with Quartz for G5, on Implacable (ameowli.dev), to see how much a difference Quartz and CPU optimisation makes.
Both of these are bone stock without any performance tweaks because-- well firstly I never had and tweaks to begin with; I never got around to it-- but mostly because I want a pure comparison out-of-the-box.
RR3-G5-Quartz did worse than RR4 generic.
RR3 scored 7.47 and RR4 scored 8.36. Though, I believe this is less a difference in machine targeting and more that RR4 ships with many (but not all) of the documented performance tweaks out of the box, and that's more of a noticeable difference even with the small losses from having a generic build.
Last edited: