A good example of all the new features coming so often: Touch something that was not needed. It takes time and energy to figure out what happened and how to get out of the feature to complete the original task. It can be very annoying.
Ask yourself would Steve have approved it? nuff said.That button has not to be a waste, it would just need to function as a second action button with its own custom action.
I have never had this happen & I often wear my Airpods on my motorcycle. You'd need to have the crown rub up against something in such a way for the crown to rotate
If it's that much of an issue for you, use a small piece of tape to immobilize the crown.
You do know this was always the default behaviour of of the button this option now allows us to not need a double press now, mr got the article wrongSmall but useful change. But this might slow down opening the camera. Some might find it useful. Anyway happy to see the option now.
If I’m shooting in portrait mode, I just use the joint and end of my thumb to press it if I’m using it one handed. I’d using both hands, I can use the tip or whatever part of my thumb or any other finger. I find that works very well.it's still useless and in the wrong spot. It's too far in to reach without covering the screen or to be difficult and uncomfortable to use.
As a professional photographer, placement of buttons is very important. This button was designed by geeks and not photographers. Besides it was reappropriated from the old SIM card slot space on the phone so it is in the wrong position because it was easier than to move everything one Inch to the right...
Besides, nobody shoots landscape anymore. 80% of the Internet content is vertical so there is even
less use for this button...
just my two cents...
...
You are also persisting in ignoring the fact that it is not like the Touch Bar because it didn’t replace things that were there before — the function keys were replaced by the Touch Bar. Nothing was replaced by Camera Control. It’s completely new and didn’t remove any functionality. That comparison is not valid.
...
It reminded me of another attempt Apple made at a touch-sensitive strip with multi-function capabilities: the Touch Bar.
The surface of the button is a smooth capacitive surface that responds to the motion of your fingertip. (The MacBook Pro Touch Bar technology lives on!)
I’m beginning to wonder if the iPhone 16’s Camera Control is becoming another "Touch Bar" (metaphorically speaking); a gimmicky, cumbersome feature that’s a solution in search of a problem. In my opinion, it’s a poor design decision by Apple, especially on the non-Pro models.
Camera Control reminds me of Touch Bar — Apple will outgrow it before their users...
Some will love it, get used to it, and then be forced to miss it.
The best way I have found to double tap for the options is using the middle finger to tap and letting the index finger control the Touch Bar
Call it what it is… the Touch Bar for iPhones.
I hate this button:
1. It is so difficult to use (the swiping, double light tapping, etc)
2. It makes taking a photo take way too long
3. The cut-outs in the cases trick me into always thinking thats the top left of the phone, rather than the bottom right
4. Out of the box, it's just yet another (5th) way to open the camera app.
5. Nobody asked for it. Nobody needs it. Nobody likes it.
I was a fan of the Macbook Touchbar, but now I understand the hate the touchbar got with the way this stupid button pisses me off.