I’m totally with you on a new Status Bar. Not implemented the same as on the Mac, because I don’t think that would be very touch optimized, but something akin to a hybrid of the macOS Menu Bar and iPhone Dynamic Island, with kind of the look and design of the Dynamic Island, but incorporating the functionality of the Menu Bar. iPadOS already has a menu bar of sorts, but it’s activated by a key command. What if it could be accessed via a button in this interface.Other random things I want:
LLM implemented into Spotlight/search throughout the operating system. I know this sounds ridiculous, but Apple has natural search in Photos, Apple Music and Apple TV. They also added an entire support LLM into Siri with iOS 18, that can answer a bunch of questions on how to do functions of your Apple device.
So the fact if you go into settings and type “Crossfade” into the search bar and are met with “no results”? Huh? The setting is literally called “Crossfade”, there is absolutely no reason it shouldn’t be able to find it.
Boot chime on the iPad, Apple Watch and HomePod. The iPhone received a boot chime in iOS 17, it’s the iPads turn, and everything else. It’s not just a fun goofy thing, it’s an actual accessibility feature. Auditory feedback on boot is very useful.
Journal, Sports, etc apps across all of their operating systems. There really is absolutely no reason for any app to be iPhone only anymore.
“Type To Siri” and “Spotlight” to be combined into one user interface. This especially makes sense over on the Mac, where Spotlight used to have natural search. Might as well just combine both. I use Spotlight as an app launcher sometimes, I use Siri as an app launcher, both spotlight and Siri can do calculations and Weather… They literally should not be different.
Redesigned AirPlay and SharePlay UI and experience. I usually don’t experience that many significant bugs on iOS, but if there is one area of the operating system that has pretty consistently caused every iPhone I’ve had to start lagging and acting up, it’s the AirPlay platter. It just never seems to be working at 100%, sometimes it’s just really slow, sometimes I’ll only want to connect to one device and it’ll connect to an entire group of them and then it’s impossible to ungroup them, it’s just a mess. And every non-technical person I know hates it too.
The ability to have the control center take up the entire screen on iPad. Maybe not by default but it really would be nice to have an entire panel of settings across the entire large screen of the iPad.
Some type of interactive status bar on the iPad. Not necessarily the same as the menu bar on the Mac, but something more useful than what exists up there right now, which is just the time, signal and battery.
Oh, and about the Control Center. So, I’m okay with an option for it to fill the screen or continue to function as is, but I really wouldn’t want a full screen Control Center to replace the current one, so I’m glad you added that qualifier. 👍🏻. But maybe instead of the Control Center blurring out apps and content behind the Control Center, it could act like a pop-down window similar to the Control Center on macOS. Maybe it could just expand from a little floating pill button in that Dynamic Island/Menu Bar hybrid interface I talked about earlier. 👍🏻. But that could be nice. Technically I think it’s more of an aesthetic thing though really, I don’t know if there’s much added utility of the pop-down window vs transparent window implementation.Other random things I want:
LLM implemented into Spotlight/search throughout the operating system. I know this sounds ridiculous, but Apple has natural search in Photos, Apple Music and Apple TV. They also added an entire support LLM into Siri with iOS 18, that can answer a bunch of questions on how to do functions of your Apple device.
So the fact if you go into settings and type “Crossfade” into the search bar and are met with “no results”? Huh? The setting is literally called “Crossfade”, there is absolutely no reason it shouldn’t be able to find it.
Boot chime on the iPad, Apple Watch and HomePod. The iPhone received a boot chime in iOS 17, it’s the iPads turn, and everything else. It’s not just a fun goofy thing, it’s an actual accessibility feature. Auditory feedback on boot is very useful.
Journal, Sports, etc apps across all of their operating systems. There really is absolutely no reason for any app to be iPhone only anymore.
“Type To Siri” and “Spotlight” to be combined into one user interface. This especially makes sense over on the Mac, where Spotlight used to have natural search. Might as well just combine both. I use Spotlight as an app launcher sometimes, I use Siri as an app launcher, both spotlight and Siri can do calculations and Weather… They literally should not be different.
Redesigned AirPlay and SharePlay UI and experience. I usually don’t experience that many significant bugs on iOS, but if there is one area of the operating system that has pretty consistently caused every iPhone I’ve had to start lagging and acting up, it’s the AirPlay platter. It just never seems to be working at 100%, sometimes it’s just really slow, sometimes I’ll only want to connect to one device and it’ll connect to an entire group of them and then it’s impossible to ungroup them, it’s just a mess. And every non-technical person I know hates it too.
The ability to have the control center take up the entire screen on iPad. Maybe not by default but it really would be nice to have an entire panel of settings across the entire large screen of the iPad.
Some type of interactive status bar on the iPad. Not necessarily the same as the menu bar on the Mac, but something more useful than what exists up there right now, which is just the time, signal and battery.
Ability to set up priority device to be notified when an application is installed on more than one device. Basically, end the nightmare of my phone, watch, Mac and iPad all making as much noise as possible whenever any app sends me a notification. Obviously, if I’m using my phone and I have my iPad locked and far away from me and I get a text, the iPad doesn’t also need to play a sound if the iPhone already has. Likewise, if I receive a phonecall, only one device needs to ring and it’s the one that’s either closest by or currently in use. Sure, have the notification silently pop up, but there is no reason I need to have four different ringtones on four different devices going at the exact same time. The devices should be smart enough to know which one needs to actually ring.
another thing is system performance should be top notch from them but I belive they still love DEI so....
Do you want them to stop issuing updates, fixes, and new features? That wouldn’t make anyone happy.Would love it Apple had the balls to say "Were stopping this idiotic new iOS release every year, iOS 18 will live on to at least 2027 and if we feel we have a pile of amazing things to share....we might release a iOS 19"
Apple really should look at MS in this case and stop the whole yearly OS release cycle that makes fully functional devices go EOL (no updates) quicker than they deserve.
No, nothing of the above.Do you want them to stop issuing updates, fixes, and new features? That wouldn’t make anyone happy.
Or is it that you don’t like the idea that after a certain point, they change the version number? It’s not like they are rushing to cram in all the features in September anyway more. They are taking a little more time to work on them before releasing them and I’m fine with that. We get a preview in June and then see them arrive of the following months.
Apple supports their hardware longer than Microsoft. I already demonstrated that Microsoft dropped support for most Windows computers from 2017-2018 in 2021 (only about 3-4 years of software support), while Apple is still supporting 2017-2018 hardware 4 years later in 2025. Apple has double the hardware support life that Microsoft has now. And that’s only counting feature updates. Apple roles out critical security patches for their older OS versions, so they offer about the same level of support for older macOS versions as what Microsoft offered to Windows 10 for the past few years. I have a 2012 MacBook running Catalina that just received a security update a couple years ago. So it received at least 10 years of updates. And trust me, the hardware was at the point that it wouldn’t really be a good idea to continue using it anyways, the hardware is completely irrelevant in the modern era. But Macs don’t need security updates as often as Windows machines, because they’re more secure, and a smaller target for hacking, so you don’t need monthly security updates on them. Heck, you don’t even need security updates on a monthly basis on new Macs running the latest version of macOS.No, nothing of the above.
I simply would like Apple to support devices for a longer time, make life easier from an enterprise admin perspective and to be a lot better than the competitors. Apple produce premium products and has a "green" policy and also talks a lot about security and privacy. We pay a premium price and on top of that Apple makes money on services, that means they should have resrources to make this happen.
If we look at MS Windows they have had Windows 10 running for 10 years and even when it is going out of support you will be able to purchase support on a yearly basis. Maybe that's something that Apple could offer too.
You can still offer new features but not having to change the major version name. Or if it has to be as it is today, with a new OS relase every year, offer it to older devices but just say "these features won't be available" it has been done many times in the past.
From an admin perspective its a bit of a pain to keep track of what devices that can run what OS and if they can receive patches. Especially if its a mix of OS version and not all of them can run the latest.
I think that Apples obesssion to release a new OS every year just complicates things and adds to the pile of electronic waste as devices aren't supported anymore.
Apple supports their hardware longer than Microsoft. I already demonstrated that Microsoft dropped support for most Windows computers from 2017-2018 in 2021 (only about 3-4 years of software support), while Apple is still supporting 2017-2018 hardware 4 years later in 2025. Apple has double the hardware support life that Microsoft has now. And that’s only counting feature updates. Apple roles out critical security patches for their older OS versions, so they offer about the same level of support for older macOS versions as what Microsoft offered to Windows 10 for the past few years. I have a 2012 MacBook running Catalina that just received a security update a couple years ago. So it received at least 10 years of updates. And trust me, the hardware was at the point that it wouldn’t really be a good idea to continue using it anyways, the hardware is completely irrelevant in the modern era. But Macs don’t need security updates as often as Windows machines, because they’re more secure, and a smaller target for hacking, so you don’t need monthly security updates on them. Heck, you don’t even need security updates on a monthly basis on new Macs running the latest version of macOS.
Apple’s software support for macOS is better than Windows. It’s around double the support life when you look at how long Microsoft supported 2018 hardware vs how long Apple did… And when you look at Apple’s software support beyond new feature updates with updates for security patches, it’s even longer than that…
Windows laptops from pre-2019 or so are trapped on Windows 10 without the new features of Windows 11. Apple has given hardware from the same year new features for over double the amount of time Microsoft did. And Apple supported my 2012 MacBook that was beyond irrelevant by the end of its support life with 10 years worth of updates. I don’t think most people hang on to a computer that long, at some point you just need to upgrade because it’s going to be completely outdated and no longer support a bunch of software. My 2012 MacBook began to not support a lot of newer apps and softwares because what developer is going to target or support 10 year-old hardware?No, Apple don't support their hardware longer than Microsoft. Windows 10 is still being supported, it was released 2015 and will be supported at least till 2028 if you want to purchase extra support.
If you got yourself a HP Elitebook 840 G1 (common enterprise model) in 2013 its still being supported with security updates.
If we look at the Macs that are supported today you need at least a Mac from 2017 or 2018 (depending on the model) or later to receive any type of software or security updates. And that has been the case since end of 2024.
One thing that's good with Macs is that you can run other OS on it or use Open Core, but that's not something a mainstream user sitting on an older Mac likely would use.
And since Apple knows exactly what HW they do need to support and patch it shouldn't be a big thing for them to offer the option that for a cheap penny (or free) get updates.
When it comes to the mobile Apple devices we don't have the same options as Macs offer, which is unfortunate.
Apple does deliver a great experience, both SW and HW and they have all the financial muscles and know-how to give users that love their products an even better value for money with longer support and contribute to less electronic waste. Maybe it’s a case of finding an acceptance with users to pay for updates or offer a iPhone/Mac as a service.
That would be some "courage" I would appreciate.Would love it Apple had the balls to say "Were stopping this idiotic new iOS release every year, iOS 18 will live on to at least 2027 and if we feel we have a pile of amazing things to share....we might release a iOS 19"
Apple really should look at MS in this case and stop the whole yearly OS release cycle that makes fully functional devices go EOL (no updates) quicker than they deserve.
What do you want Apple to do differently and what benefits are you looking for?That would be some "courage" I would appreciate.
I think that would be a bad idea. Stage Manager is just about right the way it is, and it’s great for the iPad because it actually makes sense on the iPad. It can run on the iPad’s native display. The apps are designed for a larger screen, and there are many desktop class apps on iPad that aren’t on the iPhone. Stage Manager on the iPhone wouldn’t make much sense since the iPhone’s display isn’t big enough to take advantage of it, the apps are designed for smaller screens, and it would dramatically burn through battery runtime, plus you would have to pair it with a keyboard and trackpad, where the iPad has a case that adds those things. In my opinion, DEX is just a show feature that looks cool to some, but struggles to find an actual good use-case outside of a niche of users…One thing that the iPhone is missing is something along the lines of Samsung DeX.
The iPad has Stage Manager but its still lacking some of the desktop feel that DeX has.
Now when USB-C is standard it would be nice to just be able to dock the iPhone and get a desktop experience.
Even if they "just" introduced Stage manager for iOS it would be nice feature to have.
Don't think battery-time would be an issue as you are docked to a USB-C dock or screen and that generally means the phones charging.I think that would be a bad idea. Stage Manager is just about right the way it is, and it’s great for the iPad because it actually makes sense on the iPad. It can run on the iPad’s native display. The apps are designed for a larger screen, and there are many desktop class apps on iPad that aren’t on the iPhone. Stage Manager on the iPhone wouldn’t make much sense since the iPhone’s display isn’t big enough to take advantage of it, the apps are designed for smaller screens, and it would dramatically burn through battery runtime, plus you would have to pair it with a keyboard and trackpad, where the iPad has a case that adds those things. In my opinion, DEX is just a show feature that looks cool to some, but struggles to find an actual good use-case outside of a niche of users…
Many people don’t have USB-C monitors that support reverse charging. Most people likely still have HDMI monitors. And it would be such a niche thing I don’t think it would make that much sense. Most people would likely never use it. And it would suffer from all of the other problems I laid out as well. I just don’t think it makes that much sense on a phone.Don't think battery-time would be an issue as you are docked to a USB-C dock or screen and that generally means the phones charging.