Maps by Apple are far better than Google Maps. They just are.
Either not true or the parsing of addresses there also need to work better.in a message you can simply click the address, there is no need to copy the entire thing so i don't see your point.
in a message you can simply click the address, there is no need to copy the entire thing so i don't see your point. Dates or even terms like "tomorrow at 6:00" or "wednesday at 3" become clickable "links" to create calendar events.
it sure doesn't give me a map when i google those terms. I still don't see why you think that a search engine should be able to separate words for you.
How about places with a hwy called e470 for example? the address E 470 St is not the same as E470 the hwy but you want them to magically know what you are talking about because you don't want to type one extra space.
E 46th St is not the same as
E46th St
just the same as
"The dog is a loud mutt" is not the same as
"The dog is aloud mutt"
If you wanted to search for the first quote, would you leave out the space between "a" and "loud"??? NO
If you want to search for an address would you type
East 46th Street or would you search
East46th Street without a space?
I don't type "HowToMakeChickenWings" into google and expect it to figure out where it should put spaces, so why should I expect a map to do the same?
I mean, based on your logic, why even put spaces in an address at all, it should just figure out what "12255E56thST" means right?
oh really???
[url=http://s11.postimg.org/3mqq6dwhb/photo.jpg]Image[/url]
like i said, addresses become clickable, without so much as even needing a city, state, or zipcode.
It also makes text like "3:00 today" clickable to easily make a calendar appointment. Nice try though.
You can roll your eyes, but you are the one who called me a liar and said it doesn't work and is not a feature when in fact it is.![]()
![]()
Like I said. Parsing needs work.
"123 E43rd St" is common.
I think you will find that was in response to your eyerolling up there.You can roll your eyes, but you are the one who called me a liar and said it doesn't work and is not a feature when in fact it is.
It was pretty good from the very start actually. At least the map data was accurate.
Maps is fine, honestly.
You think Google Maps was perfect the first two years?
Apple Maps has been dead-on balls accurate for me.
It's an industry term.
what would make you think that you can enter 433 E46th St???
Any logical search engine would assume that to mean "E46" Street, not East 46th Street. I don't type "EArapahoe Ave" to search for Arapahoe Ave. I don't type WBroadway to search for Broadway, so I still am confused why you think that apple should know to separate an arbitrary letter you add to the beginning of your street names in its search. when you look for something on google do you type "How to make AMovie"?? NO, you type "how to make a movie" Do you search for "HowOld Is the EiffelTower"? NO, you separate your individual words, why should a map search be any different?
I can understand that apple maps are not perfect, but your decision to merge two separate words into one is not a problem with maps, it's a problem with your ability to use a search engine.
Just because some tech blogs made rash, snap judgements on maps when it first came out, why do people have to go on saying it sucks. Apple maps kills google in every way.