I never said they should have created new products by now. My point was that people shouldn't be so quick to give Tim Cook credit for products that were created under Steve Jobs. Updating an already successful product is not as difficult as making something entirely new. When Apple do release something entirely new and it turns out to be a success, then I'll give Tim Cook some credit.
Firstly when Steve was around they introduced a new product on average every 4-5 years, mainly the iPod in 2001, iPhone in 2007 and iPad in 2010. Now under Tim Cook we have the Apple watch in 2014, so stop pretending Apple introduced revolutionary products every year. They always improved and refined their main products as they should, Touch ID for example is pretty revolutionary in some ways. Retina screens on Mac books and now on the 5k iMac not revolutionary enough?
Secondly, why such a high standard with Apple and not all the other companies?
Finally, sales actually don't lie in regards to Apples success or costumer satisfaction and your windows analogy in the other post was pathetic. You now gonna tell me they sold more android devices as well? In reality all mobile OEMs are actually broke apart from Samsung and it's not like PC OEMs are doing much better.
Apple is 1 company making their own hardware and software competing against 1 OS (android or windows) with a million OEMs that actually make the hardware. Most of it is cheap to buy, cheaply made using old tech, refreshed every few months, running outdated and unsupported software, we call it Crap.
Apple seem to be doing pretty great, I mean Samsung basically went on red alert when they saw the iPhone 6 sales. But sure the forum poster will not give Tim Cook credit, Steve Job sure must have not know anything when he put him in charge. You should run the company that is twice as valuable as its nearest competitor