Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well you know what we need, we all know what we need, and it almost works now. Dictation software.

Who wants to type in things when you can speak to your computer and have it type out your words.

Just need to filter out background noise and when you "ummm" and "errr" between words.

You could dictate to a human easy enough and the human would be clever enough to filter out things you did not mean.

One day perhaps we won't have to type.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19BWJQ8kjrw&feature=youtube_gdata
:)
 
Who wants to type in things when you can speak to your computer and have it type out your words.

On a physical keyboard, I can type a lot faster than I can talk. Also, I'd hate to have to dictate a 100 page Master's thesis (longest thing I've written), I'd have no voice left by the time I'm done.
 
Well you know what we need, we all know what we need, and it almost works now. Dictation software.

Who wants to type in things when you can speak to your computer and have it type out your words.

But you can still speak only one phoneme at a time.

And speech is only workable for some things. I've used dictation software, and I'm a programmer. Using dictation to write code is the torture of the damned. All those CamelCase Class names and such, unprounounceable variable names, pronounceable but context-dependent names (like 'c', 'see', or 'see'), and all those punctuation marks that are simple to type as a single character.. colon, e period g period, bee equals bee plus open parenthesis see times correct that asterisk log open paren bee close paren close paren semicolon. I have literally keyboarded that faster with one pencil in each hand.
 
What's wrong with the touch screen keyboard?

First, I am not going to tell you that the "virtual keyboard" is perfect. It is a little cumbersome. I miss my apostrophe key. Now I am a not a Touch typist, so, I watch my fingers regardless, I type about 40 words a minute on a regular keyboard, and with the iPad keyboard, I type about 25 words per minute. I am typing this on my iPad keyboard, and have had about 10 typo's.
All that being said, I could get used to this. I don't need to feel the keys. I generally reread everything I type anyways. Like I said, I could get used to this.
I did buy the Bluetooth keyboard, but I have not even tried to connect it yet, as it is kind of missing the point of having a tablet. When I sit down to write my great American novel, I will use it.
 
The iPad is with us now because some very expensive market research at some point said that the consumer would buy it.

It is much more convient than a notebook by far, especially after you get use to typing on it. I see it as an eventual replacement for the notebook.

At some point we will have flat keyboards that are virtual and have a space for jestures and pointing as the mouse won't be with us forever.

As far as the tablet form factor that the iPad has it will go through serveral revisions and improvements and may even roll up into ends when we get OLED screens but as far as it being useless and an interum step I disagree.
 
I must admit, I do have a problem actually believing Apple spent a LOT of time on the iPad.

I don't so much mean the hardware as the hardware is the best hardware (for the price/size/performance) that's available now.

I mean the software.

Now I know this will sound bad, but it does really seem to be quickly thrown together without spending too long on it, just in case it was a flop.

They say they have been thinking and working on it for 10 years. (or more)

So after 10 years you pretty much just slap the iPhone OS onto it, add a few bits and tweak it here and there.

Nope, I don't buy that to be honest.

I'm not saying it's not nice, but it does now come over as something that's had all those years of work pumped into it.

It's more like, we have an iPhone, (and an ipod touch) both of those products have been through a number of revisions, so let's make a BIG one, quickly mod the OS to run on the larger screen and see how it sells.

That kind of seems what's happened.

Anyone given the screen and power would have done SO MUCH MORE with it than Apple have for v1

A plain screen with fat chunky icons you press to run programs and that's the extent of the front end on a 1Ghz machine.

Hmmmmm, Can't say I feel that's the very best anyone could of come up with after a decade of development.

It works.

Now they know the market is out there, perhaps they can REALLY knuckle down and give it the OS such a device really deserves and not make it bonded to being synced all the time.

I have to say you have a point here. Apple is VERY good at providing the bare minimum, but marketing that bare minimum as an incredible technological leap forward, then the next release giving us once again a bare minimum but once again marketing it as must have.

The ipad is truly a huge ipod touch, there is no way around that. You can see the complete lack of 1st party ipad applications as evidence that Apple really didn't put much thought into the ipad other than "lets make a huge ipod touch", but then they really didn't need to other than text input, which is really the only mistake I think they made. Also someone mentioned the ipad doesn't need physical buttons, but I think this was a mistake also only in regards to gamers. You may argue that the ipad wasn't meant for gamers, but Apple is pushing it partly as a gaming device and even though we get the same people who say the type as fast on an ipad as on a regular keyboard saying they can game just as well with virtual buttons, that's hogwash from a physical point of view.

The bottom line is that Apple knew they didn't have to do a lot with a huge ipod touch, they were savvy enough to realize that would be enough to give people what they wanted and create a new market segment apart from PC's, laptops and smartphones.
 
Technically speaking, all commercial products act as product research. The company flogging the thing, no matter what it is, will look at the sales patterns and customer reaction then adjust their business accordingly.

The logic is simple enough: if lots of people buy something, you want to be making more of it, whereas if something's only getting a few sales, you need to make it more like the better product or axe it.
 
This is why the iPad makes little sense. Sure it's sorta nice to have. Kinda useful sometimes, etc. But it makes the most sense if they're using it as a research platform. All the marketing that goes to it is only to encourage people to 'deal' with the keyboard and see if under the best circumstances, people can accept it.

Several million iPad owners clearly disagree with you.

The keyboard actually works pretty well - I can type at about half the speed of my physical keyboard, and several times faster than on my iPhone.

The iPad may not make sense to you, or even be useful to you, but I do think it's a well thought out product. You have to realise that it isn't a replacement for a computer. That's where I do all my 'heavy lifting' (photo processing, editing of documents etc.). My iPad is something I use when relaxing in the living room, and when I want to be as mobile as possible. I bought mine instead of a laptop as a second device. I even write articles on it (although I usually do a final tidy up on my Mac).
 
I'm not saying it's ill-suited, but I'm questioning why there isn't a faster way. I've wondered this way too many times to ignore it. I don't think I'm that special to be the only one to have come up with the question. And if we're always perfectly happy with how things ARE, we'd be swimming in poop and eating algae.

We THINK of them as phrases, or even sentences. As a touch typist, I do too. But we're still keying in our thought one letter at a time.

The QWERTY keyboard was originally designed to slow down people in order that the letters on the end of the levers didn't clash and get stuck.

So I agree, there has to be a better way.

I noticed on the Katakana keyboard that possible words build up across the top of the keypad as more 'letters' get typed. I wonder if this would work for the Western words?
 
Hello! Hello! A queue I see I hate to queue before I pee

hmmm.. I don't get it

I hate waiting in line for bathrooms, too. :p

The biggest problem with the touch screen is that it's a binary proposition, either you're touching it or you're not. There's no inherent way to tell whether you meant to touch it or if it was a mistake, a miss, brushing the back of your finger along another part of the screen, etc. With a real keyboard there is a third state where you're touching the key but not actually pressing it down, and with the current touch keyboard model there's no way to distinguish this. That's why there's so much work invested in the auto-correct features, to reduce the impact of losing this important state.

The other problem with the touch keyboard is that there's no way to distinguish the edges of keys by feel. This can still happen on a physical keyboard -- if I try to type "hello" but my fingers are consistently off to the left by one key, I get "gwkki". But I'm either on the "h" or the "g", and not in between, because my fingers can tell that I'm on the edge of a key and I have to choose one. With a software keyboard, I might touch right in between the "g" or the "h" -- which one did I mean? And since my fingers can't feel the difference, I might type an entire word or more before I look and realize that I've been completely off.
 
I noticed on the Katakana keyboard that possible words build up across the top of the keypad as more 'letters' get typed. I wonder if this would work for the Western words?

I don't see why not, and I've been wishing Apple would implement this. The Japanese keyboard remembers the most recent words you used, so sometimes I find I'm able to "type" out fairly lengthy sentences with just a few keystrokes. Like, if this was implemented in English, when I'm typing "patent cooperation treaty," I'd just have to type "p," tap, "c," tap, "t," tap.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.