Cellular iPad is the only way for me. I don’t want to depend on WiFi when I am outside. Also, the cellular model has assisted GPS.
Agreed I’ve always done this. As far back as 2012 and never had any issues.My vote is for the non cellular
I have been using iPhone as a hotspot when no wifi availble - works well for me
I think it depends on usage and carrier and price, for example I was ok taking a deal from Verizon for 100 off of their cellular model size I usually go with cellular for my iPad and wifi for my son. The price isn't too steep for monthly use on my plan at $10 as opposed to the $20 line access for an iPhone.You need to look at how and when you will use it to make your choice.I'm wondering if it's worth getting a model with cellular?
Doesn't seem necessary to pay the extra cost to have it.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks.
I'm wondering if it's worth getting a model with cellular?
Doesn't seem necessary to pay the extra cost to have it.
What are your thoughts?
Thanks.
Tethering from my phone is free on my plan and I have 100GB of data every month so there really is no point in getting a cellular iPad.I never buy the cellular version. I have access to wifi nearly everywhere I go. For those rare occasions that I need wifi and don't have it, I use my phone as a hotspot... $5 for the month that I need it. Between the additional cost for the cellular version and the monthly charge, I've saved a ton going this route.
But for those who often find themselves in places without wifi, I can see where it make sense.
Not to argue against your point but I paid $50 more for the cellular iPad than the wifi equivalent and I pay $10 a month for the line access. if you pay $5 most months you're saving $5 most months plus the 50 overall iPad cost. That hardly is a "ton" you're saving. I rather pay that little extra to save draining the battery on my iPhone. But every person may have different needs depending on wifi access. I don't mind paying that extra because where I work the wifi is spotty and often slow.I never buy the cellular version. I have access to wifi nearly everywhere I go. For those rare occasions that I need wifi and don't have it, I use my phone as a hotspot... $5 for the month that I need it. Between the additional cost for the cellular version and the monthly charge, I've saved a ton going this route.
But for those who often find themselves in places without wifi, I can see where it make sense.
I really don't understand why you are arguing against my point when I clearly stated that rarely do I need wifi and not have it. And I took the time to explain that for people who often find themselves without wifi, then the cellular model is worth it. That would be you.Not to argue against your point but I paid $50 more for the cellular iPad than the wifi equivalent and I pay $10 a month for the line access. if you pay $5 most months you're saving $5 most months plus the 50 overall iPad cost. That hardly is a "ton" you're saving. I rather pay that little extra to save draining the battery on my iPhone. But every person may have different needs depending on wifi access. I don't mind paying that extra because where I work the wifi is spotty and often slow.
I really don't understand why you are arguing against my point when I clearly stated that rarely do I need wifi and not have it. And I took the time to explain that for people who often find themselves without wifi, then the cellular model is worth it. That would be you.
The cellular version of the iPad is $150 more than wifi only. Some carriers offer the rare discount, but that is not usually applicable. I'll define "rarely without wifi".... like 5 times a year within a 1 month window.
That's $5 for the year, for the hotspot. Compare that to $10 a month for a data plan: $120... a year. I keep my iPads about 2 years. That's $240+$150 = $390. THAT is a ton of money. edit: I forgot to subtract the 2 months of hotspot, $10 = net savings $380.