32-bit updated devices run very poorly, though. They could provide security updates, but they already push major updates as-is. Pushing harder would only make it exponentially worse - for example, the iPhone 6s has been obliterated by iOS 15, what makes you think that it would run iOS 17 with any decency? The last decent iOS update for the 6s is iOS 12. The last update in which it runs as it should is iOS 10. It would disintegrate on iOS 17.Ah well… my old iPad-4 with the A6x processor still functions well. Still on the original battery. Running iOS 10.
Now about Apple’s environmental responsibilities: if a company is that good with building hardware, it should maintain that hardware for a way longer time than is the standard today. Yes, you’ll miss out on many new features but the basic functionality remains. As this iPad didn’t receive a single security update for 7 years, I don’t dare to do any financial work on it like banking. From an environmental perspective I’d really like companies such as Apple to provide at least security updates for as long as it’s necesary - we know Apple can easily monitor the usage statistics.
Actually, I should have some iPad-1 somewhere, still waiting for a jailbreak so I can install Linux or something. Yes, this iPad is also as if it’s new.
If Apple would maintain such devices way longer, it also makes more sense to recycle old iPads to those who cannot afford a new one. I’d be happy to give mine away but only of I’m certain of its security. Now it’s actually only fit for the shredder - a shame and it hurts.
Regardless, banking on a website would be imposible on iOS 10 anyway, websites would be completely incompatible. Apple providing a security update would not change that.