Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I guess but if you have the cable on you, you likely have either a portable battery or adapter with so I think reverse wireless is really the true emergency situation fixer. Why the iPhone still doesn’t have this feature is a definite head scratcher this far along.
Magsafe (wireless charging) is a great convenience, but it is unpractical because there’s power loss in the process. Charging directly by using a cable is more energy efficient.
In theory, you should be able to charge your Apple Watch using the included charging cable. I would do it in an emergency or if I don’t have my briefcase with a battery pack with me.
 
but the phone has reverse wireless charging in it! why wont you just let us use that crapple!? i would even settle for RWC for airpods and watch as long as the phone is plugged in. at least then we really only need 1 cable. the watch breaks the damn one cable thing!!
 
What about older AirPods with the Lightning connector on the case? Can they charge from the phone with a USB-C to Lightning cable?
On the other hand, what if you try to use an iPhone 14 with the newer AirPods Pro case and the USB-C to Lightning cable going the opposite direction? Lol… so many combinations.
 
So now when on the go and if you own 2nd gen airpods pro, you only have to carry a USB-C apple watch charger to charge either of those devices with your iphone
which is stupid especially in 2023. the back of the phone should be a charger for these accessories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fwmireault
iPhone users now: Wow I can charge my other Apple devices with my iPhone!
iPhone users next year: 85% battery health after just one year? This company has lost its way under Tim! Steve would never!
 
I've been doing that with Mac laptops and iPhones for years.

It's especially useful when you're using your iPhone to Hotspot internet to your laptop, as using Hotspot drains the iPhone battery quite fast. Leave the phone plugged into the laptop, and it charges up to and stays at 100%.

I can go and sit in a cafe and work for hours without a charger with my 16" M1 Pro MBP.

Another trick, if you know you're going to need a charger when out and about, is to pack an extension cord and double adapter or multi-adapter. Thus if there is a powerpoint, but other people want to use it too, you have the double/multi-adapter to share the power, and the extension cord to sit at a distance from the power point when everyone else has taken up the seats close to it.
I'm talking about the charging brick, not the USB C port on the Mac itself, but the USB C Brick
 
I'm talking about the charging brick, not the USB C port on the Mac itself, but the USB C Brick
Oh, yeah that's no problems at all. The brick will do a data handshake with the phone, determining the phone's required voltage, and supply that. The current/power will be limited by the phone's resistance across it's charging pins. Thus the phone draws the current, rather than the charger pushing the current. The charger is capable of supplying current/power up to its max rated current/power, but how much it actually supplies is determined by the phone.

There are two basic formulas to work this stuff out:

V = IR
P = VI

Where:
V = voltage (V)
I = current (A)
R = resistance (Ω). NB: Ω is also spelt, and pronounced, ohms.
P = power (W)

Chargers supply a fixed voltage. Devices being charged supply a fixed resistance.

Chargers also have a rated maximum power and/or current. E.g. a 20W charger. However, this is merely the maximum it can supply. How much it supplies depends on the device being charged, or more specifically, its resistance.

The actual current/power supplied can be determined by the above equations.

To give you an explanation that might make sense of it. Take the power supply to your home, and various light bulbs of various power.

Here in Australia, our standard home power circuits are 240V (voltage) rated up to 10A (current). So the power lines coming into the house supply a pretty much constant 240V. They can actually carry a truck ton of current, but that is limited by two things: the circuit breaker / fuse to each power circuit in the home, which is for safety; and the resistance across the devices that draw the power.

Say you have a lighting circuit, and all the lights are switched off. In this case the resistance across the circuit is infinite, and thus the current supplied is zero.

Now say you switch on a 60W light bulb. What that light bulb actually is, is a resistor, which glows when current flows through it.

How much current flows through it, and how much resistance does the light bulb have? Well we can calculate that from the equations above.

We know that V = 240V, and P = 60W.

P = VI, thus
I = P/V = 60/240 = 0.25 A

V = IR, thus
R = V/I = 240/0.25 = 960 Ω

So what we actually have is a fixed voltage of 240V, applied across a 960 Ω resistor, which results in 0.25A of current flowing through the circuit, using 60W of power.

What about a 30W light bulb?

I = P/V = 30/240 = 0.125 A
R = V/I = 240/0.125 = 1920 Ω

So comparing the two light bulbs:
A: 960 Ω -> 0.25A -> 60W
B: 1920 Ω -> 0.125A -> 30W

So the LOWER the resistance, the HIGHER the current/power drawn.

So even though the circuit is rated to supply 10A / 2400W, each light bulb only draws what it is designed for, simply because of the resistance across its terminals.

Same thing for all Apple chargers, phones, and laptops etc. The chargers have a max power/current rating, but only actually supply what the device being charged is designed for.

You might want to be careful of chargers from unknown brands, but there are plenty of well known brands that are also good to go, e.g Anker, Belkin, etc.

Note also that you can also use a lower rated charger on a higher rated device, and all that happens is that it will charge slower. E.g. you can use a 20W charger with a 16" MBP which is rated to handle 140W of charging. It will simply charge at the slower 20W than if you used a 140W charger.

I sure hope you actually bothered to read all that ha ha, and that it made sense, and now you understand why you can use any Apple charger to charge any Apple phone or laptop and it won't be damaged.

FYI - even though I work as a software dev, I have a BEng (electrical/electronics) degree.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mazda 3s and Jeo_cz
Oh, yeah that's no problems at all. The brick will do a data handshake with the phone, determining the phone's required voltage, and supply that. The current/power will be limited by the phone's resistance across it's charging pins. Thus the phone draws the current, rather than the charge pushing the current. The charger is capable of supplying current/power up to its max rated current/power, but how much it actually supplies is determined by the phone.

There are two basic formulas to work this stuff out:

V = IR
P = VI

Where:
V = voltage (V)
I = current (A)
R = resistance (Ω). NB: Ω is also spelt, and pronounced, ohms.
P = power (W)

Chargers supply a fixed voltage. Devices being charged supply a fixed resistance.

Chargers also have a rated maximum power and/or current. E.g. a 20W charger. However, this is merely the maximum it can supply. How much it supplies depends on the device being charged, or more specifically, its resistance.

The actual current/power supplied can be determined by the above equations.

To give you an explanation that might make sense of it. Take the power supply to your home, and various light bulbs of various power.

Here in Australia, our standard home power circuits are 240V (voltage) rated up to 10A (current). So the power lines coming into the house supply a pretty much constant 240V. They can actually carry a truck ton of current, but that is limited by two things: the circuit breaker / fuse to each power circuit in the home, which is for safety; and the resistance across the devices that draw the power.

Say you have a lighting circuit, and all the lights are switched off. In this case the resistance across the circuit is infinite, and thus the current supplied is zero.

Now say you switch on a 60W light bulb. What that light bulb actually is, is a resistor, which glows when current flows through it.

How much current flows through it, and how much resistance does the light bulb have? Well we can calculate that from the equations above.

We know that V = 240V, and P = 60W.

P = VI, thus
I = P/V = 60/240 = 0.25 A

V = IR, thus
R = V/I = 240/0.25 = 960 Ω

So what we actually have is a fixed voltage of 240V, applied across a 960 Ω resistor, which results in 0.25A of current flowing through the circuit, using 60W of power.

What about a 30W light bulb?

I = P/V = 30/240 = 0.125 A
R = V/I = 240/0.125 = 1920 Ω

So comparing the two light bulbs:
A: 960 Ω -> 0.25A -> 60W
B: 1920 Ω -> 0.125A -> 30W

So the LOWER the resistance, the HIGHER the current/power drawn.

So even though the circuit is rated to supply 10A / 2400W, each light bulb only draws what it is designed for, simply because of the resistance across its terminals.

Same thing for all Apple chargers, phones, and laptops etc. The chargers have a max power/current rating, but only actually supply what the device being charged is designed for.

You might want to be careful of chargers from unknown brands, but there are plenty of well known brands that are also good to go, e.g Anker, Belkin, etc.

Note also that you can also use a lower rated charger on a higher rated device, and all that happens is that it will charge slower. E.g. you can use a 20W charger with a 16" MBP which is rated to handle 140W of charging. It will simply charge at the slower 20W than if you used a 140W charger.

I sure hope you actually bothered to read all that ha ha, and that it made sense, and now you understand why you can use any Apple charger to charge any Apple phone or laptop and it won't be damaged.

FYI - even though I work as a software dev, I have a BEng (electrical/electronics) degree.
This is really good to know, I can use one brick to charge both my Mac and iPhone when I upgrade next year to the 16 Pro Max.
 
This is really good to know, I can use one brick to charge both my Mac and iPhone when I upgrade next year to the 16 Pro Max.


you could do this even before, just with the annoyance of having to bring another cable ;)
 
Can I charge my friend's iPhone 14 Pro? I plan on having the 15 Pro Max and having more battery than they will have. It would be nice to "distribute the wealth" on occasion.
 
Question, could I use the charger from my MacBook Pro 13 inch to charge the iPhone or would that kill it?
Zero issues. I have a 100w Apple charger (as well as various other chargers). I often use the 100w charger for charging any and everything — my iPad Pro, iPhone 12 Mini, Apple Watch and even my Beats Flex headphones (as well as my Nintendo Switch and other non-Apple stuff). None of those devices come anywhere close to charging at 100w.

Everything is smart enough to only give/receive as much power as each device can handle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Dee
Question, could I use the charger from my MacBook Pro 13 inch to charge the iPhone

Yup! USB Power Delivery means they’ll negotiate. iPhone says “I can take up to 30W” (might be 35, probably something like that), and then the MBP charger offers exactly that. Whereas your MBP requests a much higher speed, and gets it.

or would that kill it?

There’s no risk, as long as both devices are compliant. If you get a weirdly cheap third-party charger, there might be some risk. Even then, iPhone probably has a safety mechanism to just reject any further charge.
 
Pretty useful. And funny how awfully quiet the lightning fans are that had their pitch forks at the ready screaming at the EU for interfering and hampering innovation (??). And now look at this …Was this little innovation even possible with lightning? Furthermore, every main stream news outlet highlights the usbc port in the iPhone, also since the rest is a real borefest. Apple should be thanking the EU on its knees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MilaM
Come on usb-c haters, even you have to admit that this is useful.

They could never. They also prefer to buy a Lightning charging cable from Apple for 25 EUR instead of buying a USB-C charging cable from IKEA for 2,5 EUR, which does the same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecoast
Yup! USB Power Delivery means they’ll negotiate. iPhone says “I can take up to 30W” (might be 35, probably something like that), and then the MBP charger offers exactly that. Whereas your MBP requests a much higher speed, and gets it.

It doesn't make a huge difference, but technically I think it is the other way around. The current source (charger) will say what it's capabilities are and the sink (iPhone in this case) then chooses what suits it best. If the sink needs more power than the source can deliver, like in the case of a MacBook, it just won't work, and the MacBook will complain.

The only scenario that's a little tricky is if you have two devices that can potentially be dual-role (source and sink; e.g. two iPhones). It's specified in the USB-C standards as well, but I don't know how well it works in practice.
 
I wonder what happens if you connect two iPhone 15’s together via USB-C.
 
It doesn't make a huge difference, but technically I think it is the other way around. The current source (charger) will say what it's capabilities are and the sink (iPhone in this case) then chooses what suits it best.

Yeah, that's quite possible.

If the sink needs more power than the source can deliver, like in the case of a MacBook, it just won't work, and the MacBook will complain.

FWIW, I know for a fact an MBP will charge even from 12W, just extremely slowly. Maybe it'll refuse 5W?

 
What about older AirPods with the Lightning connector on the case? Can they charge from the phone with a USB-C to Lightning cable?
I charge my 2nd gen airpods that way with my galaxy fold4 lol. The airpods will take it just fine.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.