i agree....
Cinema films more than 100 yeras before were maid with a fram- rate of about 30/sec- and that was leike that because human beinga are NOT ABLE to realize that they watch just about 30 single frames per second - nobody did critizise low frame rates of cinema films for 100 years......
When you scroll, you do absolutely NOT try to read or regard anything, it is like turning a page.
If you turn a page you do this NOT AT ALL because you try to read or regard anything, you try to regard something on the next side...
So - pretending at least to to need a framerate of more than 60 frames/second is just absoluetly ridiculous...
Human physiology limits benefits of tecnology, and technology does NOT limit human physiology...
This "feature" is as useless as "high tech" high-solution audio files are useless compared to "simple" mp3 audio sound.
Normal people are NOT able to identify audio files of high data amounts as more precise than simple mp3 files...
It was the Fraunhofer Institute that invested a lot of scientific work to develop the mp3 as a audio-data-reduction system long ago. On the base of long-term research of the LIMITS OF HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY...
And at the end they had developed a radical data-reduction method for audio files that normal people could NOT distinguish from not-reduced audio data files...
Please do accept the difference between fps during while SCROLLING to ANOTHER SIDE OF TEXT is perfectly different from intense concentrating on liStening to classic music.... OR A SONG....
Bottom-line:
Nobody needs more than 60 fps.. perhaps most of us not even more than 30 fps - to READ or watch a film without "stuttering" .
Of course while scrolling you see (or realize) some "stuttering", but since you DONT READ or WATCH this is no problem at all...
Don´t follow marketing gags or ridiculous pseudo-"advantages"...
