I wholeheartedly agree with you mate. It’s f***ing stunning!Every time I pick mine up, I smile. It's sexy, svelte, light, and beautiful. It's the phone I needed apple to make for years. its the Porsche of smartphones
I wholeheartedly agree with you mate. It’s f***ing stunning!Every time I pick mine up, I smile. It's sexy, svelte, light, and beautiful. It's the phone I needed apple to make for years. its the Porsche of smartphones
so key pad is bigger than 16 pro? saw someone said text etc is same size as 16 pro?I agree. Took my Pro to the office today as the air hasn’t been set up with eSIM yet and I’ve been on the air all evening. It’s just so much nicer. A lot easier to type on too.
Could not agree more.Every time I pick mine up, I smile. It's sexy, svelte, light, and beautiful. It's the phone I needed apple to make for years. its the Porsche of smartphones
I am a incoherent rambler so I understand hahahaha.Edit: nevermind I can't read, ignore
Yet apple sells a magsafe battery specifically for the Air. They are anticipating battery issues.
“Pro” implies heavy use for a part of users - that entails higher power consumption. Air doesn’t. Either way, the previous battery pack wasn’t specifically made for the Pro models only - it was for their entire iPhone 12-14 range - which used a newly introduced charging “connector”. The Air doesn’t.My question was, so when Apple released a battery pack for the iPhone Pro, it didnt trust the iPhone Pro's battery life? You cant have it both ways.
Your previous claim that they released an Air-specific battery pack (quote) “because the old one would not fit” does not make much sense to me - given that the old one hasn’t been on sale for two years. That’s what I was pointing out.Ignorance is bliss. I got it. Why let facts get in the way of your opinions? So. Let me educate you sir.
I’m not. Neither did I claim to be. So stop the hyperbole. I’m merely stating my opinion - and so are you.I know you are a world class marketing guru
Including me, yes (though I’m not sure I can count myself as part of a majority). But the Air fails for some of them as well: Because of its width (see the first impressions thread on this forum with several people disliking the width). It’s not really a “small” phone.There is obviously a large subset of people tired of heavy, bulky phones.
Well, the speculation is, kind of, the point of this thread, isn’t it?what matters to Apple is will they sell enough to make it worth their while. We will find out next year. I am not big on idle speculation.
“Pro” implies heavy use for a part of users - that entails higher power consumption. Air doesn’t. Either way, the previous battery pack wasn’t specifically made for the Pro models only - it was for their entire iPhone 12-14 range - which used a newly introduced charging “connector”. The Air doesn’t.
Your previous claim that they released an Air-specific battery pack (quote) “because the old one would not fit” does not make much sense to me - given that the old one hasn’t been on sale for two years. That’s what I was pointing out.
Whatever the Air’s geometry (that I knew about! I read the articles myself), it has got nothing to do with their “old” battery pack.
It would have more sense saying it doesn’t fit contemporary battery packs made by third parties. But even if they concluded “we can leave the non-Air battery pack market to third-parties, the point still stands: they’re selling a battery pack exclusively for the Air - and it’s their only such MagSafe battery in their current lineup.
(…and: they made a big point about battery life with that pack)l
I’m not. Neither did I claim to be. So stop the hyperbole. I’m merely stating my opinion - and so are you.
That said, I’ve sold iPhones for a living to have experienced a few things about customers’ perception.
Including me, yes (though I’m not sure I can count myself as part of a majority). But the Air fails for some of them as well: Because of its width (see the first impressions thread on this forum with several people disliking the width). It’s not really a “small” phone.
The Air’s a cool, shiny gadget. A thin marvel of engineering (though not unprecedented in Android land). A preview into the future of iPhones, if you will.
…and that is OK! More power to anyone that likes it and loves their “Air” purchase.
I still believe the Air makes some compromises and is marketed, positioned and priced somewhat awkwardly in Apple’s lineup. Which will preclude it from enjoying great mass market appeal and becoming a top-selling model.
Again, it’s OK if someone likes Apple’s more “niche” offerings (just as I am a huge fan of the iPad mini form factor - which certainly is far from being Apple’s best-selling).
We need not get to emotional about it.
Well, the speculation is, kind of, the point of this thread, isn’t it?![]()
For not being popular its kind of weird how most threads on MacRumors trending are air related and most YouTube videos, Apple News articles, are mostly air.
Or I see the trending threads on this site all being about the air. 😏Or your algorithm is feeding you what you want?
Ok move the goalposts. 🤷♂️Or I see the trending threads on this site all being about the air. 😏
This will only fuel the "fire" and lead to more Air sales.Or I see the trending threads on this site all being about the air. 😏
This will only fuel the "fire" and lead to more Air sales.
Most regular folks who are not MR will be attracted to the Air merely because of the form factor, weight, and price point.
Would be interesting to see sales numbers after the holidays...
Good point, but since I came from the Pro camp, the Air is a lower price point for me.Kind of agree, but price point ain’t it. Regular folks aren’t inclined to pay $999 for a phone when there is an option for $799, especially if you are buying or financing multiple phones.
Not only is there an option for $799, it just so happens to be the best value iPhone (of 17 series) and has more features than the Air.Kind of agree, but price point ain’t it. Regular folks aren’t inclined to pay $999 for a phone when there is an option for $799, especially if you are buying or financing multiple phones.
Kind of agree, but price point ain’t it. Regular folks aren’t inclined to pay $999 for a phone when there is an option for $799, especially if you are buying or financing multiple phones.
Perhaps the OP has a point - In the UK, iPhone Airs are still readily available to order for next day, while the base iPhone 17 and the Pro have a 2 week + wait.
Note - I am not criticizing the Air, just saying what I see.
We both have made our points and agree to disagree.You’re misstating what I said, repeating yourself and tossing in more condescending remarks? Why?