Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Oculus Mentis

macrumors regular
Sep 26, 2018
144
163
UK
As the industry moves towards disaggregation and DPUs good ol' Apple seems to be going the opposite direction with its own SoC ?‍♂️
Well, this unless Apple will smell the coffee and come up with a DPU based ARM MacPro to resurrect the not so stupid concept of modularity. Could the idea of a MacPro in a smaller form factor be the hint at moving towards that direction?

Whether you are are real pro or just a nerd today it make sense to have separate modules for CPU, RAM, Storage and Graphics talking to each other via 100Gbit links and that can be configured and upgraded independently withouth throwing everything away. Look at what NVIDIA is doing with BlueField-2 or Fungible with DPU based storage.

Now that technology is here to allow it, this type of modularity is not just needed in the datacentre, it does make at lot of sense also in the AI and video editing department where scalability is needed vertically (more resources to users) and horizontally (increased number of users). DPU based modularity would deliver just that without having to open desktop chassis or moving them around via a ludicrously expensive set of wheels...

So maybe yes, I hope for 7,1 to go to history as the peak and outdated "monolithic" MacPro. With such an ubiquous and home grown ARM based architecture Apple today has all the cards to enable a modular design to help its customers for real.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: LeonPro

LeonPro

macrumors 6502a
Jul 23, 2002
933
510
That would certainly bring more customers to Apple with modularity and a DPU even if for a Mac Pro lineup to start. Time will tell.
 

toke lahti

macrumors 68040
Apr 23, 2007
3,293
509
Helsinki, Finland
Time will tell. What will the M2 bring to all the M1 owners?
Hopefully tb4 with -for the first time!- tb-hubs.
I can't even consider buying a mac with 2 ports.
I'm always out of ports with my mini2018.
And yes, my usb3.1g2 hub is unreliable enough to run external OS...
 
Last edited:

deconstruct60

macrumors G5
Mar 10, 2009
12,493
4,053
Also macos11 is based on freeBSD?

Yes, largely because it is mostly based on borrowed stuff from 'userland' freeBSD. There is no major rewrite of the Posix system for macOS 11. (FreeBSD is more so a path to POSIX/UNIX certification with code with a "friendly to Apple" license than some 'love' of a particular BSD flavor. ) I doubt Apple would even try to follow BSD politics into different niches. There is no big upside there. freeBSD is still a bigger player than the others. ( with stuff like FreeNAS/TrueNAS drifting away we'll see how the most popular BSD anything stays over the long term. )


Are diskutil’s apfs switches open source?

APFS is Apple File System. Do that even sound even remotely open source? The switch can be a call to another program. It isn't like they have to put AFPS stuff inside of diskutil sources.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.