It seems as if every matte owner is returning their C2D MBP, or is not satisfied with it. Are these issues widespread or localized? Should all potential matte buyers steer clear?
It seems as if every matte owner is returning their C2D MBP, or is not satisfied with it. Are these issues widespread or localized? Should all potential matte buyers steer clear?
and I'm very particular about even tiny defects ...
It seems as if every matte owner is returning their C2D MBP, or is not satisfied with it. Are these issues widespread or localized? Should all potential matte buyers steer clear?
Only if you feel like being troll fodder.
You know when people photoshop up 'new' mac hardware to start rumours? Well there is a similar buzz to be had with telling people who are really enjoying a new toy that said toy is actually a heap of crap and they could have spent their money more wisely elsewhere.
There are also the type of people who so desperately want a 'good' machine that they will suspend reason and opt for group reassurance from anywhere and anyone. This is where trolls find cheap but still rather amusing pickings.
If you want anything but reassurance for spending a ton of money then you really have to take a more scientific approach.
Now and again we see examples of hardware that get through quality control, these are usually well documented in a 'reliable' manner.
I rationalise this by comparing hardware prices and seeing what Apple is competing with these days. Things will be wrong sometimes. We really would have supply and value issues if every MBP was 100% without doubt perfect.
If it makes you feel any better and perhaps allows you to start thinking 'scientifically' rather than 'emotionally' then I'll have to admit that every time I spend a ton of money on 'Toys' I feel very guilty.
Hope that helps you through the 'data' we're being presented with.
I second you.