1. Yes
2. Yes
It is the same site. HTTPS is more secure, as the connection will be encrypted between your computer and the server.
Out of curiosity, what could happen if one used http one in etrecheck case? Could outside party somehow infect the downloaded app?
Or would downloading etrecheck from http be as safe as from https as I am not entering any data myself?
spctl --assess -vv <application>
$ spctl --assess -vv ~/Downloads/EtreCheck.app
/Users/<username>/Downloads/EtreCheck.app: accepted
source=Developer ID
origin=Developer ID Application: Etresoft, Inc. (U87NE528LC)
A connection can be intercepted somewhere between your computer and the destination server, e.g. by the network provider, the DNS provider, the Internet-service provider and so forth. It is thus possible for someone to intercept your connection and redirect you to an infected software download. TLS (HTTPS) mitigates this by encrypting the connection between your computer and the server.
Note that macOS will refuse to open unsigned software by default, regardless whether it came from an HTTP or HTTPS website. This means that an attacker must also obtain a valid developer certificate from Apple (or steal one from another developer). You can always check the signature of a downloaded program with this Terminal command, and then see whether the name is legit.
Code:spctl --assess -vv <application>
For example, using it on a downloaded copy of EtreCheck:
Code:$ spctl --assess -vv ~/Downloads/EtreCheck.app /Users/<username>/Downloads/EtreCheck.app: accepted source=Developer ID origin=Developer ID Application: Etresoft, Inc. (U87NE528LC)
Yes, but it's very unlikely.Thank you for explanation!
I'd only ask then would it be possible for someone to make identical looking (but malicious) site with same name, only one has https and other http?
For example (using current example) https://etrecheck.com/ and http://etrecheck.com/
One being official and other scam site? Or would this be impossible?
Yes, but it's very unlikely.
I really wouldn't worry about it.
The developer of EtreCheck would notice it very quickly and take action. Pretty much the same goes for most of the other websites you visit on a daily basis.
2) Also, would it be possible for someone to make identical looking (but malicious) site with same name , only one has https and other http?
For example (using current example) https://etrecheck.com/ and http://etrecheck.com/
One being official and other scam site? Or would this be impossible?
For example if malicious app was masked as Etrecheck, no one would bother make it display what look like Etrecheck results after its scan? At least not good enough to fool anyone when its posted in Mac forums?
(Just trying to figure out how far can scamming go. )
That’s a bit more difficult to answer. A domain name is ultimately just a name that points to an IP address of another computer (the server). etrecheck.com points to 69.163.152.207. HTTP and HTTPS is similarly just syntax for the port numbers to which the connection is made, 80 and 443 respectively. Domain names are maintained by DNS providers. As long as the DNS provider you are using correctly points etrecheck.com to 69.163.152.207, then an attacker could not claim either the HTTP or HTTPS website for themselves.
However, given what I said above, an attacker can intercept your connection and pretend to be etrecheck.com, regardless of port number. They could theoretically even act as a TLS server and still give you a valid HTTPS connection, but this is mitigated by separate mechanisms. For those I refer you to this excellent video:
.
Usually something like this is discovered quickly. But it is certainly possible that an attacker infects a working copy of the program. This happened with Transmission last year. The application worked normally, but it also installed ransomware in the background.
I know this is an old thread, but I seem to recall John Daniel from Etresoft explaining why Etrecheck was no longer in the App Store. Now suddenly it’s back in the AppStore again. Does this seem strange to anyone
If so, then you (and your bff Asinrutee) remember incorrectly. EtreCheck was never in the Mac App Store until Sept. 21, 2018. It was a significant amount of work to get it running in the Mac App Store sandbox.I remember the developer saying that too. Perhaps Apple have changed the rules in the App Store.
According to the developer, the Pro version is $9.99. It's advertised in the App Store as having an "in app purchase".
Thanks, 'chscag'.
I'm slightly confused though. In the product reviews in the Apple App Store I see this:- https://imgur.com/gallery/WgHg1JM
That clearly shows the price being £9.99 - pounds sterling, not dollars.
I've searched all pages of the etresoft web site and no longer see a price mentioned anywhere. Maybe these tired old eyes have simply missed it! No doubt someone will provide a link if I'm mistaken.
I am not responsible for random screenshots you might find on the internet. Nor am I responsible for the blatant falsehoods that are often included in app reviews.
Talking about things that don’t seem right, I have just read a comment from Etresoft about how pleased he is that he has just got his product on the App Store, yet I have just seen this from 2017 http://macappstore.org/etrecheck/
Both you and I, Asinrutee, know that 'etresoft' posted another message earlier today, in between the current posts 18 and 19 - either he, or a moderator, has removed it. He stated that EtreCheck didn't feature in the Apple Store until September 21st 2018, so your finding is truly intriguing!
My question remains unanswered.
If he's genuine, John will return and answer in a civil manner. It's important that one can be confident in a developer before downloading and then installing, or running, software on one's computer.
His integrity had not been in question until be started wriggling on the Apple Support Communities forums earlier this year. His LinkedIn persona appeared fine when I first checked it some years ago but it is no longer visible to me. The web site is shown http://etresoft.com indicating that the company is based in Canada, but the map at linkedIn shows the company being in California, USA. https://www.linkedin.com/company/etresoft-inc./
My integrity has never been in question.His integrity had not been in question until be started wriggling on the Apple Support Communities forums earlier this year.
I deleted that account due to online harassment from cyber-stalkers.His LinkedIn persona appeared fine when I first checked it some years ago but it is no longer visible to me.
As I have stated before in this thread, if you have a problem with information displayed on some random website, you need to contact that website. I am not responsible for any information you see on Mac App Store reviews, macappstore.org, Linkedin, or any web sites other than my own.The web site is shown http://etresoft.com indicating that the company is based in Canada, but the map at linkedIn shows the company being in California, USA. https://www.linkedin.com/company/etresoft-inc./
Are you claiming that the responses - 'Developer Response' - in the Mac App Store have NOT been made by you, John?I am not responsible for any information you see on Mac App Store reviews
There is no misunderstanding here. There is only you trying to twist my words and waste my time.Are you claiming that the responses - 'Developer Response' - in the Mac App Store have NOT been made by you, John?
The truth WILL out - always!
Here's an example, just so there is no misunderstanding:-
I didn't twist your words - merely quoted them.There is no misunderstanding here. There is only you trying to twist my words and waste my time.