Whilst I wholeheartedly agree with that (why wouldn't I - my daily drivers are now Intels?) why is it that on this forum, Youtube playback is the one PPC endeavour that is derided with the "what's the point" rejoinder?
Replacing HDDs with SSDs, elaborate GPU flashing, CPU replacements, forcing incompatible OSes into old hardware - none of these efforts are ever met with a "what's the point when you can just use an Intel Mac?"
I can understand the challenge aspect of it, and in that vein I admire the folks who continue to get it to work.
In fact, I'll jump on a solution every once in a while when it's posted(I'm generally not smart enough to figure them out on my own) but get frustrated when I'll set something up, have it working for a few weeks, and then it dies.
So, I guess, for me, Youtube is something I wrote off a long time ago. The last time I tried, I could still more or less power through videos using TFF on a Quad without any special measures, but that's about where I stop. I haven't taught O-chem or done any writing in a few semesters that required the use of some of the software installed on my main Quad(I do have a couple of them, but the one gathering dust in the corner of my office is my primary one). I don't pay the power bills at work, but at the same time I like a cool office and these days with a Sun Ultra 5 and SGI Octane running all the time(I know, priorities) not to mention an MP 1,1, I'm at about the limit of what our flaky HVAC can handle.
So, I guess I should say I ADMIRE folks getting Youtube to work, it's just that for me getting the most out of software these computers were designed to run is both a more fruitful and enjoyable pursuit.
Incidentally, Nikon Scan is misbehaving badly enough on my MP 5,1 that the dual 2.7 or maybe even a Quad is about to come back in to service. I'm not sure how multi-threaded Nikon Scan is-I need to experiment/research that to determine if the big scans from the 8000 will be faster on the dual 2.7 or the Quad.