iPadOS 13.4 code isn't reliable?
It’s pre-release code that can change. It’s strong evidence, but it’s not a definite. I believe it’ll be 6GB. I just still consider the info a rumor for now.
iPadOS 13.4 code isn't reliable?
It’s pre-release code that can change. It’s strong evidence, but it’s not a definite. I believe it’ll be 6GB. I just still consider the info a rumor for now.
Yep, my iPad Pro 2018 was a great investment. Unfortunately can’t say the same about my very first iPad.Yeah A12Z?
I'd be feeling pretty good about my 2018 iPP right now if I had one if its just the camera, 6gb, and wifi 6
The real question is when is the NEXT refresh? late this year? early next? feels like won't be as long as it was between this one and the last certainly
It will obviously be better. We'll have to wait for benchmarks. The only thing I see on Apple's website is it has 8-core graphics.
Most likely A12Z will be an incremental improvement over A12X at best.
Yeah I got bit by the 3rd gen. Something tells me that Apple was probably aiming for an a13x but something went wrong with the design (thermals, manufacturing issue) and went with plan “Z” instead.
The cynic in me says that the bean counters at Apple figured that they could just rebadge A12X chips with all 8 graphics cores enabled.
[automerge]1584603004[/automerge]
CPUs are years in the making and Apple would have been testing a13x samples over 6 months ago. If a a13x ever existed it was abandoned long before all this pandemic.
You mean like pretty much every new gen iPad?
I don't think it is anything that cynical. The X-series processors are a new die (albeit based on an existing die) and it is easy to forget how expensive that is to develop. The A13 in many ways was a stop gap chip until the 5nm process was perfected and brought up to speed—I'm sure the A14/A14X is already finalized so that Apple can be first on TMSC's foundries. Developing another 7nm processor (the A13X) was probably too expensive—these aren't high volumes models and I'm betting the 12Z will be unique. Whereas the A14X will be used in a several different products.Why? Because obviously Apple needs to have a reason for you to upgrade to the next iPad.![]()
No. A9X is about 15-20% faster than A8X.Look at A8X, A9X, A10X, A12X. Each of them doubles the performance compare to their predecessor.
I think we are done with iPad Pro's this year. Apple did release multiple iPad upgrades in 2018, but only one for iPad Pro. We may not see another update until 2021 or Oct 2022.
I wonder if the A12Z is some sort of die shrink of the A12X and in the course of re designing / shrinking it they added one GPU core?
That's only partially true, single core is almost double compared to A8X. A9X was a dual core (vs A8X 3 cores, but with almost double the single core speed, which in ipad make much more of a difference than multi-core).No. A9X is about 15-20% faster than A8X.
Not quite the first time this has happened. Apple did much the same thing with the 3rd gen iPad released in the spring of 2012. It had an A5X chip that was just the same A5 found in the iPad 2 in 2011 with some extra graphic cores added to handle the new Retina display. The iPad 3 also turned out to be a holdover device too as the A5X was never quite powerful enough for the demands of the retina display, and it was quickly replaced by the iPad 4 with an A6X chip in the fall of the same year. Being one of the people who got burned by the iPad 3 is making it much easier to take a pass on this round. My 2018 Pro is still more than adequate for what I use it for and it sounds like some display improvements are coming in the next gen. Also, the fact that the Pro line starts at $800 rather than the $500 of the earlier iPads is helping keep my wallet closed this time.Don't see 2022 as remotely possible, they aren't going to keep essentially the same chip (which will be 4 years old) in 2022 for that long, especially as they'd be on the A15 next year. This feels like the 1st time in the iPhone/iPad new releases where they completely didn't mention a CPU/GPU performance increase (only mentioning 8 core GPU) which says A LOT.
The fact that they didn't even bother to really make an actual SOC update, and essentially only added the cameras and a bit of ram screams holdover device until they could make it feasible to put the mini-led (in 12" allegedly), 5G, and a probable A14X as the A14 iPhones would already be out by then.
Based on the latest rumors, we'll have a 5G ipad with A14X by the end of the year.Not quite the first time this has happened. Apple did much the same thing with the 3rd gen iPad released in the spring of 2012. It had an A5X chip that was just the same A5 found in the iPad 2 in 2011 with some extra graphic cores added to handle the new Retina display. The iPad 3 also turned out to be a holdover device too as the A5X was never quite powerful enough for the demands of the retina display, and it was quickly replaced by the iPad 4 with an A6X chip in the fall of the same year. Being one of the people who got burned by the iPad 3 is making it much easier to take a pass on this round. My 2018 Pro is still more than adequate for what I use it for and it sounds like some display improvements are coming in the next gen. Also, the fact that the Pro line starts at $800 rather than the $500 of the earlier iPads is helping keep my wallet closed this time.
Except that the A5x chip in the iPad 3 was woefully inadequate in powering the Retina display (I was noticeably getting skipped frames from running certain games that weren't all that demanding), which was subsequently rectified in the A6x chip of the iPad 4.Not quite the first time this has happened. Apple did much the same thing with the 3rd gen iPad released in the spring of 2012. It had an A5X chip that was just the same A5 found in the iPad 2 in 2011 with some extra graphic cores added to handle the new Retina display. The iPad 3 also turned out to be a holdover device too as the A5X was never quite powerful enough for the demands of the retina display, and it was quickly replaced by the iPad 4 with an A6X chip in the fall of the same year. Being one of the people who got burned by the iPad 3 is making it much easier to take a pass on this round. My 2018 Pro is still more than adequate for what I use it for and it sounds like some display improvements are coming in the next gen. Also, the fact that the Pro line starts at $800 rather than the $500 of the earlier iPads is helping keep my wallet closed this time.
Nah, at least for the entry level model, the fact that it gets not only 50% more RAM but also twice the included storage (and the other various upgrades) makes the 2020 model the better buy IMO.I hope Apple will show us some apps that developers have created with the LiDAR camera at WWDC.
Right now, it’s just feels like a more accurate measuring tool.
As such, the 2018 iPad Pro seems like the better deal (especially priced on Apple’s refurbished site) given the speeds are nearly identical. The extra 2gb of RAM may come in handy for those who are really pushing it with video editing.
I think for the majority, it’s a not really a concern with futureproofing.
I hope Apple will show us some apps that developers have created with the LiDAR camera at WWDC.
Right now, it’s just feels like a more accurate measuring tool.
As such, the 2018 iPad Pro seems like the better deal (especially priced on Apple’s refurbished site) given the speeds are nearly identical. The extra 2gb of RAM may come in handy for those who are really pushing it with video editing.
I think for the majority, it’s a not really a concern with futureproofing.
This video shows some interesting possibilities with the new LiDAR capability -
New Capabilities Made Possible By the LiDAR Scanner on the 2020 iPad Pro
This is new, complex functionality and I think it will take a while before polished, sophisticated apps become available.
Nah, at least for the entry level model, the fact that it gets not only 50% more RAM but also twice the included storage (and the other various upgrades) makes the 2020 model the better buy IMO.
Nah, at least for the entry level model, the fact that it gets not only 50% more RAM but also twice the included storage (and the other various upgrades) makes the 2020 model the better buy IMO.