You paly FEAR on full
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Eek! :eek: :eek:"
It's a 256mb card right? My 128 struggles with FSAA turned on
I think that's what you call a generous exaggeration.
I'm willing to bet what he really means "stays between 10 and 30fps most of the time on medium-low settings with no AA and at 1024 resolution."
i don't really know why people make claims like this...
anyway, to OP, the truth is there is a long and storied history of Apple not servicing those of us who want a good graphics card with reasonable options. Even though they've built several Core technologies that can leverage the power of modern graphics cards, they insist on only offering cards that are at LEAST a full generation behind the PC world, and to add insult to injury, they charge you 50-100% more for those slower, older cards!
We've been complaining about it for years, basically since graphics cards became an issue. We will probably keep complaining about it for years, because Steve Jobs doesn't like games unless they're 5 dollars to develop and/or buy-out and have an iphone interface.
The sad thing is that there are games available for Mac right now that came out months ago on PC that the fastest iMac cannot play above medium settings at its native resolution. I have given up telling my friends about how they can buy a Mac and still play windows games, because it isn't really true. Yes, you can run windows. Yes, you can run Half Life 2. But guess what? HL2 ran well on a 700mhz P3 with a geforce 4200. I doubt you could get a solid 10 fps in Crysis with Boot Camp on any shipping Mac other than on the Mac Pro with the X1900 unless you turned the graphics settings basically 'off.' And that might be pushing it.
So in summary, welcome to the club. be prepared for a bunch of fanbois to tell you how their mac mini plays all the best games at 1080p "smooth as butter."
you get used to it after a while.