Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,530
19,709
If we assume it’s going to be 4x M1 Max chips and that it scales linearly, that’s 400GB/s x4, or 1,600GB/s.

But to achieve that bandwidth they will probably need to use some other technology, because 16x large LPDDR5 memory modules sound, well, unrealistic...
 

quarkysg

macrumors 65816
Oct 12, 2019
1,247
841
If we assume it’s going to be 4x M1 Max chips and that it scales linearly, that’s 400GB/s x4, or 1,600GB/s.
Although we may have massive bandwidth, this will limit the Mac Pro to only 256 GB of memory. I don't think this will fly with the Mac Pro customer base. And there's no ECC memory as well, as far as I know, so this is a regression from the existing Mac Pro as well.
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,530
19,709
Although we may have massive bandwidth, this will limit the Mac Pro to only 256 GB of memory. I don't think this will fly with the Mac Pro customer base. And there's no ECC memory as well, as far as I know, so this is a regression from the existing Mac Pro as well.

Do we know for sure there is no ECC? I mean, from the looks of it, these are fully custom RAM modules, who knows what's in there... LPDDR5 does have support for channel ECC...
 

quarkysg

macrumors 65816
Oct 12, 2019
1,247
841
Do we know for sure there is no ECC? I mean, from the looks of it, these are fully custom RAM modules, who knows what's in there... LPDDR5 does have support for channel ECC...
Yeah, I suppose Apple could custom order ECC LPDDR5 memory modules. It looks like the M1 Pro and M1 Max memory modules are custom made for Apple as well, as each module seems to have 128-bits data bus.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.