I wonder why Apple saw a need to put out a new model after just one year. The previous update took 4 years. What are their plans?
The 2021 wasn't really an update from the 2017 model, basically just a chip replacement. There wasn't a big jump for CPU performance and there was actually a decrease in GPU performance when from from the A10X in the 2017 to the A12 in the 2021.
Feature wise, there really wasn't anything added. Same storage, same RAM, same price...
I think Apple did it more to consolidate the chips that they were using at the time. There has only been one of other device that has ever used the A10X, the 2017 iPad Pro, which was discontinued a long time ago. So, Apple was either producing or storage A10X chips for only the ATV4K1, which was probably not cost effective. Going to an A12 chip, while not really an upgrade, was probably done to reduce costs for Apple.
The previous update took 4 years. What are their plans?
I posted this in a different thread, but there actually looks like a pattern to ATV releases, with the HW switching back and forth from underpowered relative to the other chips Apple had at the time if the release, to being the top-of-the-line A-chips for that particular year:
2015 ATV4, A8 was underpowered relative to what was available at launch.
+2 years
2017 ATV4K1, A10X was the top-of-the-line chip at the time.
+3ish years
2021 ATV4K2, A12 was underpowered relative to what was available at launch.
+ almost 2 years
2022 ATV4K3, A15 was the top-of-the-line chip at the time, second to the expensive A16.
Maybe the A15 ATV will be around for another 3 years, and Apple will put a (relatively) mediocre A-chip in the next model.
I was thinking AR/VR also, because the A15 is a huge jump from the A12.
But, Max Tech on YouTube pointed out something interesting about the A15 chip in the ATV4K3, according to Apple the A15 is less powerful in the ATV4K3 compared to other devices with the A15 in them.
Max Tech said it might be due to the lack of fan on the 2022 model, but other devices with the A15 do not have a fan.
So, I wonder if Max Tech has it wrong, and it isn't that the A15 in the ATV4K3 has reduced performance due to a lack of a fan, but maybe the previous two ATV4Ks had their chips overclocked due to having a fan attached and being able to handle the excess heat.
AFAIK, the ATVs do not have any benchmark data, and everything assumed about the chips is information of those chips in other devices. Many of the performance assumptions on the ATV (other than subjective experience from use) is based off of how the ATV chips perform in other devices. Maybe these assumptions are wrong.
Anyways, here is the clip @5:21: